Mr. Cesta contacted me by phone as a favor to another Lawyer who no longer works in the area of my…read moreconcern. Mr. Cesta listened to my complicated situation and then point by point, guided me through all of my concerns. He was professional without being stuffy and at no time did I feel as if I was being talked down to. Of all the things Mr. Cesta could have done, he chose to help me and make sure all of my questions and concerns were addressed. I can't recommend Mr. Cesta highly enough and should the need arise, there is no question about where I will seek legal counsel.

I found Tom by searching for lawyers that were close to that area. Thank god I found him. I sent an…read moreemail, he contacted me shortly after, and answered all of my questions. Very knowledgeable and helpful. I'm very glad Google found him for me.

Rating = 0/0 I had…read morethe most unprofessional experience with the Workmens Compensation lawyer Kurt Knisley. He violated several parts of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct by threatening to put a lien on my claim, not once, but twice, for simply asking questions and expressing concerns. He violated the following core rules: Rule 1.2 (Scope of representation; allocation of authority) The client decides the objectives of representation, including whether to settle; the lawyer must consult with the client about means and keep the client reasonably informed. Rule 1.4 (Communication)Requires the lawyer to keep the client reasonably informed and to explain matters so the client can make informed decisions. Violation: Kurt Knisley did not inform me nor provide the details of the settlement demand until after the document was sent to the Respondent. He provided no option for the demand letter to be tailored according to my needs. Kurt threatened to withdraw as counsel and to place a lien on my claim in response to me asking him why this was done. Kurt Knisley decided to try to intimidate, instead of communicating and consulting. Rule 1.5 (Fees)Fees and expenses must be reasonable, and any lien for fees must be based on a valid fee agreement and applicable law. Violation: Kurt Knisley used the lien primarily as leverage to silence my concerns. This is inconsistent with the requirement that fee practices be fair and reasonable. Rule 1.16 (Declining or terminating representation)Lists when a lawyer may withdraw but requires withdrawal to be done in a way that protects the client's interests. Violation: Kurt Knisley used the threat of withdrawal and lien in a way that materially harmed my case simply because I challenged his strategy and asked questions. Rule 8.4 (Misconduct)Prohibits conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, and conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. Violation:The lien threat was knowingly misleading about Kurt Knisley's actual intention and was mainly used to coerce me into silence or agreement. I would not recommend Kurt for any Workmens Compensation case on these grounds. Kurts threats were retaliatory and coercive. A lawyer should not try to punish a client simply for disagreeing or asking questions. After all, it is a lawyers responsibility to keep clients informed, and represent their lawful objectives diligently.

Excellent work. Timely, precise and thorough. Will use them again if needed. Very prompt in…read moreresponding to our call.

Highly recommended. Doug worked on my case ecently and got great results. I couldnt recommend him…read moremore highly. He is very experienced and knows how to navigate all those tight corners and nuances of the law of the land. over years, I have used him several times in my business and personal matters and he has fought hard for me and got me the best possible outcomes. most of the time he is able to get the case dismissed , charges dropped and fines cancelled or reduced. He is very accesible and really listens to your matter. He is quick and efficient. His office staff is very respectul and they ALWAYS pick up the phone. U actually talk to real people and not bots or computerized voices. i have nothing againist technology but its great when a real person answers your call. Honestly if you are looking for good honest and fair representation, you should give them try. This office has always delivered for me and I think they will for you too. i dont think you will regret.

Doug was my third attorney call (first two did not care at all) - Doug let me speak and listened…read more Doug took on my case, as a traffic attorney, for being pulled over for driving without a license (NOT suspend very different) or insurance in Grove City, OH. Long story short I had to do was obtain my license with insurance and the case would be dismissed. This is exactly what happened due to Doug's many connections he has in Grove City. My case was dismissed as I listened to Doug and I had to pay a $65 fine. I HIGHLY recommend Doug and his team! He is the best price (I was shocked! Thank you), responsive, incredibly intelligent, calm and will work hard for you as a client. Thank you to Doug, Anthony, and the entire Riddell Team for getting my case dismissed!

Atkins and Atkins has always been forthcoming, patient and helpful with any legal questions that I…read morehave asked. I appreciate their honesty and ability to handle delicate situations with professionalism and compassion.

Jesse is the best lawyer I have ever had the pleasure of working with. Very friendly and…read moreknowledgeable.

I hired Stephanie (and Pam!) to handle my divorce after dealing with a LOT of frustration with my…read moreprevious lawyer (I.e., expensive billings every 2 weeks, not responsive to email, no results in almost a year, etc.). In less than 3 months, she finalized my divorce and avoided trial. We won on all of the major points in both the divorce and child custody. Stephanie was extremely responsive to my questions and concerns, provided AMAZING results from day 1, and ended up costing a fraction of what my previous lawyer billed. I seriously cannot recommend her enough!! I can finally close this chapter! Thank you so much for everything, Stephanie and Pam!!!

Very pleased with the responsiveness and professionalism of this law office. Our estate planning…read morewas completed much sooner than we anticipated. Appreciated the time and patience in explaining the terms included in the documents. We felt very much appreciated during our interactions. Highly recommend this law office.

After speaking with him about a case, I emailed him as he requested about the case & after 2 weeks…read morestill waiting on a response. Will have to spend time searching for a new attorney now.

Since 2006 I have used Attorney Goldstein for many things such as writing my will, reviewing real…read moreestate contracts before I have purchased them, legal guardianship of my grand child and most recently name change in January 2015. He is knowledgable, personable and takes the necessary time to meet with you. He never rushes you out the door. Since I have used him so much over the past several years he has given me very reasonable pricing for his services. His service cost are already lower than other attorneys throughout central Ohio so for me staying a loyal customer is a win-win. I get great attorney presentation from a knowledgable attorney without having to pay an outlandish amount of money. Attorney Goldstein is always available. He is flexible to see clients at their convenience. His office secretary is always so nice and helpful too. I have referred many family and friends to attorney Goldstein and I will continue doing so. In addition, I will continue using him for all of my legal needs. I give attorney Goldstein and his office secretary my highest level of recommendation. All of their help and efforts in meeting my needs is gratefully appreciated!!!

Matt Ice helped me all the way though my insurance claim and settlement. He was extremely helpful…read moreand was able to achieve a large settlement, more than I ever thought. I would strongly recommend him.

I regret hiring Corey Lauer and GB Law to represent me. In my opinion, this office operates more…read morelike a high-volume settlement firm than trial counsel prepared to go the distance. Throughout my case, I felt they were far more interested in a "fast and easy" settlement than in doing the actual work required for a case involving lasting physical and psychological harm. Key issues from my experience: Lack of Proactive Strategy: Vital steps, such as obtaining a psychological evaluation, only happened because I was strongly advised to do so by a different law firm (Malek & Malek). From my perspective, Corey Lauer's office did not appear to consider it necessary, which I found deeply concerning. Minimizing Valid Claims: When I raised the importance of a workers' compensation aspect of my incident, an attorney from this office declined to assist and minimized its value. Another firm saw the importance immediately, and the final records show that a Bureau of Workers' Compensation (BWC) lien was indeed part of this case. Risk-Averse Advocacy: I felt consistently pressured to accept a low offer. The communications I received focused almost entirely on the "risks" of trial rather than the merits of my claim. To my knowledge, there wasn't even an effort to escalate my claim to the insurance adjuster's supervisor. The Final Result: I ultimately felt forced to settle for a low-ball offer--not because the offer was fair, but because the firm's lack of preparation left me with no confidence that they would properly represent my interests at trial. Because I had to do the heavy lifting that they neglected, I requested they lower their contingency fee from 25% to 20%. Corey Lauer refused, stating the partners would not agree to any further reductions. I essentially paid a significant amount in attorney fees for a result I could have achieved, or likely improved upon on my own. They took a large cut for simply processing paperwork, while I was the one identifying the medical and legal gaps they ignored or failed to address. Be aware: In my experience, you may get weak results here. I do not believe it is worth your time or money. There were many concerning issues, and I felt taken advantage of.

Tony Clymer is one of the good guys, an attorney you can trust to act in your best interest. He has…read morehelped me with various legal / contract questions, and his rates have been very reasonable. Highly recommended!