@Bella H. Hello…read moreBella, My name is Audrey and I am a former tax accounting intern at Clark & Lowe law firm. I wanted to follow up with you regarding your review - I have had a professional relationship with the attorneys at this firm for a couple of years, and can assure you that strict protocols are followed regarding client privacy. Given the sensitivity of the information that is handled at the firm, there is a system of controls and checks & balances behind the scenes that is in place to prevent information breaches. The system of controls is deliberately not made aware to the interns to ensure that the system is not compromised, so just because you cannot see the security controls does not mean that they are not there. Additionally, extensive background checks are conducted before offers are given for the internship. With regards to your remark about the demographic makeup of the intern class, there is indeed a diverse group of people working at the firm - I myself am an American and have worked with people from many backgrounds. The firm's commitment to diversity and inclusion sets it apart from other firms. Clark & Lowe remains committed to high quality legal and tax services, and I can attest that client privacy is, and will always be, a top priority.

They hire bunch of unprofessional international students to work on your tax stuff. Imagine your…read moretax related information being exposed to a group of intern that don't sign any formal working agreement. Avoid if you can.

Rating = 0/0 I had…read morethe most unprofessional experience with the Workmens Compensation lawyer Kurt Knisley. He violated several parts of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct by threatening to put a lien on my claim, not once, but twice, for simply asking questions and expressing concerns. He violated the following core rules: Rule 1.2 (Scope of representation; allocation of authority) The client decides the objectives of representation, including whether to settle; the lawyer must consult with the client about means and keep the client reasonably informed. Rule 1.4 (Communication)Requires the lawyer to keep the client reasonably informed and to explain matters so the client can make informed decisions. Violation: Kurt Knisley did not inform me nor provide the details of the settlement demand until after the document was sent to the Respondent. He provided no option for the demand letter to be tailored according to my needs. Kurt threatened to withdraw as counsel and to place a lien on my claim in response to me asking him why this was done. Kurt Knisley decided to try to intimidate, instead of communicating and consulting. Rule 1.5 (Fees)Fees and expenses must be reasonable, and any lien for fees must be based on a valid fee agreement and applicable law. Violation: Kurt Knisley used the lien primarily as leverage to silence my concerns. This is inconsistent with the requirement that fee practices be fair and reasonable. Rule 1.16 (Declining or terminating representation)Lists when a lawyer may withdraw but requires withdrawal to be done in a way that protects the client's interests. Violation: Kurt Knisley used the threat of withdrawal and lien in a way that materially harmed my case simply because I challenged his strategy and asked questions. Rule 8.4 (Misconduct)Prohibits conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, and conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. Violation:The lien threat was knowingly misleading about Kurt Knisley's actual intention and was mainly used to coerce me into silence or agreement. I would not recommend Kurt for any Workmens Compensation case on these grounds. Kurts threats were retaliatory and coercive. A lawyer should not try to punish a client simply for disagreeing or asking questions. After all, it is a lawyers responsibility to keep clients informed, and represent their lawful objectives diligently.

Excellent work. Timely, precise and thorough. Will use them again if needed. Very prompt in…read moreresponding to our call.

To HNB: I'm glad…read moreyour team reached a favorable outcome, within a great time limit of just (4) four months. The benefits provide some financial relief and stability moving forward. If you are having issues with SSDI, contact HNB Mr. Michael Rake, Esq. and his team for a great outcome. Client Thomas Davis III

I easily recommend Mario Napolet for anyone needing legal services. Mario was always responsive and…read morecommunicative, making sure we understood our options fully before making any decisions. Mario was thoughtful, empathetic and respectful during an extremely difficult time. Most importantly, the legal fees were reasonable.

What a positive experience I had with Mario Napolet Law Firm. His Professionalism & Tenacity was…read moresecond to none. Going through a Dissolution was nerve wrecking and full of uncertainties. Attorney Mario Napolet calm demeanor and confidence, was comforting and much needed. I felt Mr. Napolet had prepared our case, for every scenario imaginable. Napolet Law Firm, responded to all my calls, office visits and countless emails and/or texts. I give them 5 Stars without hesitation. I have the Firm on speed dial for any legal matters a may have to address. I've already shared with Family/Friends that Napolet Law Firm is the real deal, and without question above reproach. You can't have a more dedicated Staff, working for your best interest!!!! Respectfully, Daniel Scott

I had a complicated bankruptcy case a lot of sleepless nights and stress and as soon as I contacted…read moreAttorney Cydrus my problems were solved. He actually answered his phone on a Saturday while he was cutting his grass that's how important business is to him. Also my dog was in Pet Suites and I was unable to get him out financially and Attorney Cydrus took care of that also and reunited my dog with me. If you're in need of a bankruptcy attorney and you don't contact Attorney Cydrus you're making a big mistake other attorneys wanted to charge double and do less Also his secretary is so knowledgeable pleasant and more than helpful

I had a lot of legal questions and Sean and his staff were able to answer all my questions and…read morereturned my calls promptly. I had a great experience and would recommend talking to these guys first if you are considering bankruptcy.

I benefitted greatly from the accounting services privided by Thomas Brankamp CPA, and would offer…read morethis piece of advice to prospective clients; take the path being laid out for you, Thomas is very entrepreneurial and can help get you to your destination. He's generous with introductions and demonstrates his interest in building a longterm prosperous relationship.

Tony and team are excellent community supporters who give back to the place they live and work…read more Tony represents his clients superbly and provides caring support throughout the process.

If I could give 0 stars I would. this has to be the most incompetent and unprofessional law firm…read moreI've ever experienced. Not only was I cussed out and hung up on by one of their lawyers, but when I called back, the receptionist was hostile and didn't want to transfer me to a supervisor. Not only was the lawyer extremely rude but he also was incorrect on many of his points and ruined a business deal. DO NOT USE this law firm unless you want incompetent and nasty lawyers.

If you are seeking a divorce attorney and you want to retain an experienced counsel only to be…read morerepresented by an amateur at the last minute without warning or consent, or you welcome counsel that will fight harder for your soon-to-be ex than you, or you hope to be told that you instructed us to fail you miserably, or you embrace sleepless nights wondering what might have been had you chosen a more competent counsel, then Wolinetz & Horvath just might be the firm for you.

Very sharp lawyer. Guided me through a very tough divorce. He was responsive and patient. Very…read morehighly recommended.