Mr. Holmes was thorough, responsive, assessed the information I presented, reviewed my case,…read moreprovided his opinion of the best plan. I am grateful for his thorough constructive opinion and recommendations. It was a great value in determining a plan.

Do not waste your time or funds on this law firm. My case was thrown out never even made it to…read morecourt. When I asked for the contract that I signed for them to represent me in court they told me they could not find it nor do they remember signing one. David W Martin versus The Boeing company online.

I had a wonderful experience with this firm. The attorneys and their staff were very kind and…read moreresponsive to me and helped guide me through the entire process. Overall they were great to work with an I would hire them again!

Called 2nd week of January this year about a possible vaccine medical claim. Gave the paralegal the…read moreinfo, received a call from a nurse and provided all the information and was told a lawyer will call me in 5 to 10 day, 30 days later still not received a call. Would give a 0 if possible.

I do not know anything about any attorneys in this firm except Timbes…read moreI was very dissatisfied with Mr. Timbes what he did for me But mostly what he did not do for me. I wrote a review sometime ago and asked if Mr. Timbes could contact me to discuss and as of today I have heard nothing

When I first contacted this law firm, I was so hopeful they would help me to the fullest of the…read moreextent they could and made me feel they would. After suffering through an accident, that was not my fault, and going through rehab every single day for a month and half and still suffer to this day. In my opinion, that "care" was short lived very quickly. The lawyer I was assigned drug my case out for 1 1/2 years and went through 4 paralegals causes so much miscommunications and multiple request for the same information requested. That lawyer wasn't even there long either. When I called back 8 months later, he had already left. After all was said and done (1 year later and I did not have the energy to deal with them any longer), I sat and wrote the following e-mail to just explain my feelings of my entire experience... Dear Mr. Thurmond, My name is Keith. I was previously a client with your firm under xxxx. It has been a year since settling my case and I decided to wait until the dust settled and I had a clearer and less angry perception while under Xxxx's care. I am not writing you today to request anything from your firm but to say that I was so totally unsatisfied with the representation I received. Not only did I have to deal with 4 paralegal changes under Xxxx during my tenure under his "care", but given wrong information from one (that I believe caused her to be released) and affected my case, but repeatedly asked for identical documentation on numerous occasions. My frustration at times with xxxx (and I am a very patient man) caused me to contact you personally, via e-mail concerning them. After facing my physical issues for 1 1/2 years, the opposing attorney made an offer to me that would pay all my bills. In the end, I accepted the offer, paid my bills, paid your firm and walked away with such a small amount of funds that is to help me with my future medical needs. To this day I suffer greatly. I realize that you and your firm is in the business of making money and possibly my situation wasn't what would bring in big dollars. I still expected more when my case was accepted with, in my mind, proper and diligent representation. I write you today to simply tell you that because I was not offered the care I not only needed, but required and the representation I received was one of the worst I think I have ever heard of in my life from anyone, I will not be using or recommending your firm to anyone in the future. I will in fact share my experience with them and tell them to continue their search. I then received this the same day... I am in receipt of your email. Obviously, I am not pleased to relieve such an email. While XXXX is no longer with our firm, I intend to understand better the facts of your case and why you feel the way you do. I intend to get back to you no later than a week from this email. Thank you for letting me know your concerns. Paul On March 28th I received the following.. I am still gathering information. It will be another week or two before I respond. Sorry for the delay. Paul To this day, they have not followed up anymore, nor responded to one final e-mail I sent. As I said before...keep looking folks. Seriously, I would never trust or use this firm again.

I was in need of a debt attorney. Mr. Cantrell Jr. spoke with me over the phone and provided great…read moreadvice in our initial consultation. He was extremely knowledgeable, genial and just so understanding of my situation. John spoke words of encouragement in our hour long consultation and refused payment for our initial conversation. I have worked with attorneys for more than 20 years of my life and being on the client side is always stressful. Mr. Cantrell made sure I understood my options and was a peaceful and reassuring presence when I needed it most. I can't recommend him highly enough!

He's a piece of SHIT!!!!!! He helped my husband in my divorce instead of helping me and I had to…read moreput a one on yelp and I would put a -10 if I could. He's only after your money and once he gets it, he doesn't help you AT ALL!!!! I would not hire him if you want good service. He talks a good game, but he doesn't deliver. He literally stole my money and didn't do a thing for me!!!!

Mr. McMilliam is a great lawyer, he was able to give us a piece of mind with the issues we are…read morehaving with our HOA.

Great law firm! Highly recommended- they offer a range of legal services with a personal touch.read more

Michael did an outstanding job from day one. He communicated effectively, therefor I was up to date…read moreevery step of the way. I highly recommend Michael Harrison for any legal services.

I have known Michael Wood for many years and I can say that without a doubt he is the most moral…read moreand compassionate man I know. He will do anything to fight for his clients and he has done excellent work with abuse cases. You want this man on your side.

This individual is with out a doubt the worst attorney for divorce proceedings. Not only did he…read moremishandle my case, but his paperwork and filings are a mess. I have had to go back to court just to clean up the mess he created. He is sloppy and arrogant. Now you could say that this is me being upset over the outcome and some of that would be true. However these opinions have also been stated by no less then four other attorneys from three separate law firms. To further my point regarding Michael's work product I am posting a copy of Michaels public reprimand. This is for 2008, however he committed the same act while representing me. He also tried to get me to testify for him while he knew that he was committing the same type of act that got him the public reprimand which he failed to mention. This man is despicable. There are to many attorneys to use a bad one. I would use a negative star if I could. In the Matter of Michael David Wood Annotate this Case THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court In the Matter of Michael David Wood, Respondent. Opinion No. 26513 Submitted June 3, 2008 - Filed June 30, 2008 PUBLIC REPRIMAND Lesley M. Coggiola, Disciplinary Counsel, and C. Tex Davis, Jr., Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, both of Columbia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Michael David Wood, of Charleston, pro se. PER CURIAM: In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent (Agreement) pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the Agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to a confidential admonition or a public reprimand. We accept the Agreement and issue a public reprimand. The facts, as set forth in the Agreement, are as follows. Facts Respondent represented a client in a domestic matter. The client, who was living in the marital home, gave respondent an unopened package addressed to the client's spouse that had been delivered to the marital home. Respondent, without the knowledge or consent of the addressee, opened the package and removed its contents. Immediately thereafter, respondent informed opposing counsel, who was present for an emergency hearing in the case, of his actions and allowed him to inspect the contents of the package. During the emergency hearing, respondent informed the court that he had opened the package and he presented the contents of the package to the court. Law Respondent admits that, by his misconduct, he has violated the following provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR: Rule 4.4 (a lawyer who receives a document relating to the representation of the lawyer's client and knows or reasonably should know that the document was inadvertently sent shall promptly notify the sender) and Rule 8.4 (it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, to engage in conduct involving dishonesty or to engage in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice). Respondent further admits his misconduct constitutes grounds for discipline under Rule 7(a)(1)(it shall be a ground for discipline for a lawyer to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct) and Rule 7(a)(5)(it shall be a ground for discipline for a lawyer to engage in conduct tending to pollute the administration of justice or to bring the courts or the legal profession into disrepute or conduct demonstrating an unfitness to practice law) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR. Conclusion We find respondent's misconduct warrants a public reprimand. Accordingly, we accept the Agreement and publicly reprimand respondent for his misconduct. PUBLIC REPRIMAND. TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, PLEICONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Not any communication to let you know they weren't taking your case. Very bad customer serviceread more

This review is long but worth it. I want to start by saying that I originally did not hire this…read morefirm. I was injured in an accident in SC but lived out of state so in the midst of trying to recover, I simply asked a few people for a referral and they suggested another firm. I was told by others that I should get a lawyer simply because it would make it easier on me as they would handle communications with bills etc. and take things off my plate. I do not want to go into too many details on that firm as this is not their review but my experience with them was absolutely horrible. I felt like my case was going to end poorly and I felt like I had no control over that, despite the fact I was killing myself trying to heal and trying to do deal with them. I even had doctors call me directly, refusing to deal with my lawyer there, because of his unprofessionalism. As luck or fate would have it, thankfully someone at that firm asked David Yarborough to step in to see if he could help on my case. For no extra charge to me. I can never put into words how much I owe to David and his team, as well as a 3rd firm that stepped in. After the very first introduction, I called my friend crying because I could tell that I finally had someone who very clearly knew what they were doing. Shortly after, I was introduced to the rest of his team and their empathy, professionalism, and kindness, was overwhelming after not having that for over 3 years. They continually reminded me that my focus should be on healing, that it should not be on the case. They also never made me feel like I had to prove my injury. I would like to specifically call out Cait, the paralegal I dealt with, as her compassion was everything. When I would mention how incredible it was that they were so kind and actually treated me like a person, Cait told me that they all had done specific trainings and team exercises to make sure they focused on the clients needs, including the impact trauma has on mental health. That it was important to them that they showed that in their actions. Cait talked to me often to calm and reassure me, including supporting my faith in God, the morning before court. She is not only great at her job, but is a beautiful, kind person; inside and out. I also know the stereotypes that come with lawyers and despite being INCREDIBLY good at what they do and being very successful; never once did David or Reynolds show up with their ego in the way, or treat me as less than them. I dealt directly with them, not some gatekeeper, and they showed the action Cait mentioned above. They were "regular" relatable guys, who cared deeply about what they do and their clients. They hugged and held me when I was crying after court and never shamed me for being emotional. I am writing this because I cannot recommend them enough and they changed my life. Not just because of the result of my case, but because of how they treated me. They probably will never understand how badly I needed that at the time and I am forever thankful.