Highly recommended. Doug worked on my case ecently and got great results. I couldnt recommend him…read moremore highly. He is very experienced and knows how to navigate all those tight corners and nuances of the law of the land. over years, I have used him several times in my business and personal matters and he has fought hard for me and got me the best possible outcomes. most of the time he is able to get the case dismissed , charges dropped and fines cancelled or reduced. He is very accesible and really listens to your matter. He is quick and efficient. His office staff is very respectul and they ALWAYS pick up the phone. U actually talk to real people and not bots or computerized voices. i have nothing againist technology but its great when a real person answers your call. Honestly if you are looking for good honest and fair representation, you should give them try. This office has always delivered for me and I think they will for you too. i dont think you will regret.

Doug was my third attorney call (first two did not care at all) - Doug let me speak and listened…read more Doug took on my case, as a traffic attorney, for being pulled over for driving without a license (NOT suspend very different) or insurance in Grove City, OH. Long story short I had to do was obtain my license with insurance and the case would be dismissed. This is exactly what happened due to Doug's many connections he has in Grove City. My case was dismissed as I listened to Doug and I had to pay a $65 fine. I HIGHLY recommend Doug and his team! He is the best price (I was shocked! Thank you), responsive, incredibly intelligent, calm and will work hard for you as a client. Thank you to Doug, Anthony, and the entire Riddell Team for getting my case dismissed!

It is not easy for me to trust an attorney because in general they all have a conflict of interests…read more- they charge by the hour and I need to have the matter closed as soon as possible. Chris is one of the few I feel very comfortable with. He has handled several family matters for us. He was detailed, open and very easy to work with. I found Chris through my employer legal plan, but I used him since for the matters not covered by the plan.

From the owner: Christopher J. Minnillo offers 40 years of experience serving clients in Central Ohio. We offer a…read morepractical, efficient approach to deal with legal issues using strategies that come from years of experience. Contact us today!

This law firm is incompent. The ability to clarify. They only retain clients that are seeking…read morelarge amounts. Lawyer's use to be all about justice. I was told that the efforts were not worth their time to try my case.

From the owner: Columbus, Ohio law firm with over 40 years of legal experience. Our attorneys have handled over…read more30,000 personal injury cases and helped clients receive more than $150,000,000. We focus on a wide variety of legal practice areas including: personal injury, auto accidents, nursing home abuse, medical malpractice, wrongful death, legal malpractice, dog bites, divorce and family law, oil and gas leases, probate litigation and much more.

@Bella H. Hello…read moreBella, My name is Audrey and I am a former tax accounting intern at Clark & Lowe law firm. I wanted to follow up with you regarding your review - I have had a professional relationship with the attorneys at this firm for a couple of years, and can assure you that strict protocols are followed regarding client privacy. Given the sensitivity of the information that is handled at the firm, there is a system of controls and checks & balances behind the scenes that is in place to prevent information breaches. The system of controls is deliberately not made aware to the interns to ensure that the system is not compromised, so just because you cannot see the security controls does not mean that they are not there. Additionally, extensive background checks are conducted before offers are given for the internship. With regards to your remark about the demographic makeup of the intern class, there is indeed a diverse group of people working at the firm - I myself am an American and have worked with people from many backgrounds. The firm's commitment to diversity and inclusion sets it apart from other firms. Clark & Lowe remains committed to high quality legal and tax services, and I can attest that client privacy is, and will always be, a top priority.

They hire bunch of unprofessional international students to work on your tax stuff. Imagine your…read moretax related information being exposed to a group of intern that don't sign any formal working agreement. Avoid if you can.

When looking for great representation, it's quite difficult to find/choose a lawyer to represent…read moreyourself that truly has your best interests from the jump. Although everyone's circumstances are different, I'd like to start off by saying the experience this man has is incredible. All around an incredible lawyer & person.Through all the countless court appearances he was more than determined to make things happen! From police officer to lawyer there is no better option than Jay Perez.!Will forever be thankful I decided to pick this man to represent me, not only was his professionalism outstanding. The dedication he displayed was unmatched

From the owner: Criminal Defense; Immigrationread more

I was charged with a misdemeanor by Columbus Police and I hired Michael Probst as my attorney. I…read morecould not be more pleased with my decision. Michael Probst provided excellent representation. At first, things were not looking so good because the prosecution would not budge, but eventually Michael was able to get me a favorable outcome. I will not go into the details of the case, but he believed my story and was able to help me greatly. As a result of his representation, my charges were dismissed. If you need a defense attorney to represent you, then I would definitely recommend Michael Probst. Michael Probst will go above and beyond to help you with your case.

Other attorneys told us they would not be able to improve my son's juvenile traffic court outcome…read more Michael was very forthright about expectations, but also very attentive - at a reasonable cost. He stated that his experience as a prosecutor could help, so I took the chance and asked him to represent my son. The outcome far exceeded our expectations. A certain one-year suspension was avoided.

I live out-of-state and needed to hire an attorney who specializes in Estate Planning in Columbus,…read moreOH. I found Ms. Jane Higgins Marx's name (Carlile Patchen & Murphy, LLP) in an attorney registry and scheduled a phone consultation. During the consultation, she agreed to take my case and requested I send her several documents, including the entire copy of a trust. After she received my documents, I emailed her asking her rates, to which she responded. She also asked for my permission to phone the attorney of the defendant in this case. After several weeks of no communication, I emailed her asking for an update and did not get a response. I waited another week, and decided to leave a voicemail with the same request for an update. Again, no response. At that point, I wrote her a letter stating my frustration and disappointment in the total lack of communication. In order to be fair to her, I gave her several weeks to respond to my letter before I left this review. After not receiving a response to my letter, I decided to submit this review. I feel I was essentially "ghosted." At the bare minimum, I should have been contacted, even if it was to tell me she was too busy, or that she decided not to take my case. My case is time-sensitive, and I basically wasted four weeks that I could have been working with another attorney. In addition, because she never communicated back about whether she called the defendant's attorney or not, my case could now be negatively impacted. If she did, in fact, speak with the other attorney, that attorney has now been informed that I've hired an attorney, and they now have weeks to prepare, which now puts my case at a disadvantage. At the very least, her failure to communicate with me demonstrates a lack of integrity and pride in her work and is all together unprofessional.

Four months before his death, an attorney with this firm convinced my elderly father to name them…read moreas co-executor of his estate. They informed no one in his family, including the other co-executor. At every point they have made this terrible thing that happened even worse and acted only in their best interest. If you think this firm cares about you or your family, please let my experiences disabuse you of that fallacy.

Rating = 0/0 I had…read morethe most unprofessional experience with the Workmens Compensation lawyer Kurt Knisley. He violated several parts of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct by threatening to put a lien on my claim, not once, but twice, for simply asking questions and expressing concerns. He violated the following core rules: Rule 1.2 (Scope of representation; allocation of authority) The client decides the objectives of representation, including whether to settle; the lawyer must consult with the client about means and keep the client reasonably informed. Rule 1.4 (Communication)Requires the lawyer to keep the client reasonably informed and to explain matters so the client can make informed decisions. Violation: Kurt Knisley did not inform me nor provide the details of the settlement demand until after the document was sent to the Respondent. He provided no option for the demand letter to be tailored according to my needs. Kurt threatened to withdraw as counsel and to place a lien on my claim in response to me asking him why this was done. Kurt Knisley decided to try to intimidate, instead of communicating and consulting. Rule 1.5 (Fees)Fees and expenses must be reasonable, and any lien for fees must be based on a valid fee agreement and applicable law. Violation: Kurt Knisley used the lien primarily as leverage to silence my concerns. This is inconsistent with the requirement that fee practices be fair and reasonable. Rule 1.16 (Declining or terminating representation)Lists when a lawyer may withdraw but requires withdrawal to be done in a way that protects the client's interests. Violation: Kurt Knisley used the threat of withdrawal and lien in a way that materially harmed my case simply because I challenged his strategy and asked questions. Rule 8.4 (Misconduct)Prohibits conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, and conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. Violation:The lien threat was knowingly misleading about Kurt Knisley's actual intention and was mainly used to coerce me into silence or agreement. I would not recommend Kurt for any Workmens Compensation case on these grounds. Kurts threats were retaliatory and coercive. A lawyer should not try to punish a client simply for disagreeing or asking questions. After all, it is a lawyers responsibility to keep clients informed, and represent their lawful objectives diligently.

Excellent work. Timely, precise and thorough. Will use them again if needed. Very prompt in…read moreresponding to our call.