I was a student of Rachael's from age 5 until age 18, and I have to say, my experience learning cello from her was one of most positive developmental elements of my entire childhood. She not only did an exceptional job at channeling my energy into musical practice and performance, but also played an instrumental role in helping me develop as a student and human being.
Unlike many teachers whom I'd meet at classical-music-related events throughout my childhood, Rachael is most focused on helping the student learn. Not on criticizing the child, disciplining the child, or turning the child into a neurotic competition-winning machine. The students of Rachael's who win competitions win because they love to play and practice, because Rachael has helped them understand how they can enjoy the cello as an artistic outlet in their lives. They get into top orchestras because it's what they have come to love. They wow audiences with their recitals because they're passionate and FEEL the music from the inside-out, not because perfect technique has been beaten into them against their will.
Rachael puts her students first, and has an incredible way of sparking intrinsic motivation.
She did that with me. I remember being five years old, wiggling around in my chair, wondering what I was doing in a cello studio when I'd rather be outside playing. But Rachael made the experience of learning "Twinkle Twinkle Little Star" incredibly fun and exciting. I felt a sense of progress and accomplishment, and I felt the freedom to explore my emotions through the cello. This continued through the entire Suzuki series until I moved on from Suzuki at age 16 after learning and performing the advanced concertos. Rachael always fostered my development as a learner, and I always looked forward to cello lessons (even if I didn't always look forward to practicing my cello at home!!!).
In today's age of standardized tests, no excuses for anything other than straight-A's, and "tiger mothers" singing their battle hymn (if you know what I mean), an unhealthfully-high degree of competition and stress is inevitable in a child's life. Which begs the question: do your child's extracurricular music lessons really have to be one more thing for them to dread? Or can they be something that lights a fire inside your child's soul and makes them come alive, to express themselves and find meaning through learning, progress, and creativity? If you subscribe to the latter, then consider Rachael's cello "dojo" a place for your child to excel and find meaning in life.
For context, I'm now 26, married, and a father, and if I still lived in LA, I'd enroll my son with Rachael, because I'd want him to have the same experience I had. And in case my comments criticizing the standardized tests and college admissions cycle make me seem extreme, let me reassure you: I took SAT prep, I got into University of Chicago and went there, I don't play cello that much anymore but am thinking of taking it back up, I am a normal adult male now and am not an anti-success hippie; quite the contrary...what I believe is that Rachael's teachings enabled me to pursue whatever I WANTED to pursue...if I'd wanted to go to a music conservatory and become professional, Rachael was supportive of that, and if I wanted to go to an academic university and not become a professional cellist, she was supportive of that, too. All I'm saying is that her approach is one that is extremely healthy for a child, and I would totally do it all over again. read more