I had a wonderful experience with this firm. The attorneys and their staff were very kind and…read moreresponsive to me and helped guide me through the entire process. Overall they were great to work with an I would hire them again!

Called 2nd week of January this year about a possible vaccine medical claim. Gave the paralegal the…read moreinfo, received a call from a nurse and provided all the information and was told a lawyer will call me in 5 to 10 day, 30 days later still not received a call. Would give a 0 if possible.

Charges a $450 Initial Consultation fee but then did not do anything to actually handle my case…read more Why are there so many awful Family Lawyers in Charleston area! What happened to putting People over utter Greed and selfishness!

Mrs. Schmutz is awesome. She was able to predict exactly what would happen in my case. A couple of…read moretimes when I was worried, she was able to calm me down and assure me everything would turn out fine. She has a very calming demeanor and was always available to talk and always returned my phone calls in a timely fashion. She took a miserable process and guided me through it in a professional and dignified manner.

Shannon Jones and her team are the very best at family law. Shannon's understanding of the vast…read morebook of law that she uses to defend her clients cannot be surpassed. Shannon put my faith back into the judicial system and showed me that my children and I are protected from someone trying to abuse the court system by using judicial and financial power to have control. Shannon takes thoughtful consideration into the wellbeing of children and shouldn't that be the point of family law? - Jenny L Bernard

My husband and I first met Shannon Jones in 2009 when she helped my husband in a family court…read morematter. We reached out to Shannon for a second time in late 2012 for a modification of the prior matter. I had not spoken with Shannon since 2012, so it made me feel great when I contacted her a few weeks ago and without missing a beat she remembered us and our case and was ready to help us once again. Ours has been a decade long relationship with Shannon and I believe that says a lot about her. She takes a personal interest in you, your family and your situation. She is compassionate, knows her stuff and works and fights hard for you. I would highly recommend that if you find yourself needing a professional, ethical, yet kind and compassionate attorney that you contact Shannon.

I have known Michael Wood for many years and I can say that without a doubt he is the most moral…read moreand compassionate man I know. He will do anything to fight for his clients and he has done excellent work with abuse cases. You want this man on your side.

This individual is with out a doubt the worst attorney for divorce proceedings. Not only did he…read moremishandle my case, but his paperwork and filings are a mess. I have had to go back to court just to clean up the mess he created. He is sloppy and arrogant. Now you could say that this is me being upset over the outcome and some of that would be true. However these opinions have also been stated by no less then four other attorneys from three separate law firms. To further my point regarding Michael's work product I am posting a copy of Michaels public reprimand. This is for 2008, however he committed the same act while representing me. He also tried to get me to testify for him while he knew that he was committing the same type of act that got him the public reprimand which he failed to mention. This man is despicable. There are to many attorneys to use a bad one. I would use a negative star if I could. In the Matter of Michael David Wood Annotate this Case THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court In the Matter of Michael David Wood, Respondent. Opinion No. 26513 Submitted June 3, 2008 - Filed June 30, 2008 PUBLIC REPRIMAND Lesley M. Coggiola, Disciplinary Counsel, and C. Tex Davis, Jr., Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, both of Columbia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Michael David Wood, of Charleston, pro se. PER CURIAM: In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent (Agreement) pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the Agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to a confidential admonition or a public reprimand. We accept the Agreement and issue a public reprimand. The facts, as set forth in the Agreement, are as follows. Facts Respondent represented a client in a domestic matter. The client, who was living in the marital home, gave respondent an unopened package addressed to the client's spouse that had been delivered to the marital home. Respondent, without the knowledge or consent of the addressee, opened the package and removed its contents. Immediately thereafter, respondent informed opposing counsel, who was present for an emergency hearing in the case, of his actions and allowed him to inspect the contents of the package. During the emergency hearing, respondent informed the court that he had opened the package and he presented the contents of the package to the court. Law Respondent admits that, by his misconduct, he has violated the following provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR: Rule 4.4 (a lawyer who receives a document relating to the representation of the lawyer's client and knows or reasonably should know that the document was inadvertently sent shall promptly notify the sender) and Rule 8.4 (it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, to engage in conduct involving dishonesty or to engage in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice). Respondent further admits his misconduct constitutes grounds for discipline under Rule 7(a)(1)(it shall be a ground for discipline for a lawyer to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct) and Rule 7(a)(5)(it shall be a ground for discipline for a lawyer to engage in conduct tending to pollute the administration of justice or to bring the courts or the legal profession into disrepute or conduct demonstrating an unfitness to practice law) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR. Conclusion We find respondent's misconduct warrants a public reprimand. Accordingly, we accept the Agreement and publicly reprimand respondent for his misconduct. PUBLIC REPRIMAND. TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, PLEICONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Although I have heard good things about Mary Murray herself I have had the unfortunate experience…read morerecently of dealing with her associate attorney Keely Carter. Keely attempts to over compensate for her inexperience with a napoleonic approach to her perceived authority. The insecurity that she demonstrates and attempts to cover up has no place in the role that she (recklessly) plays in people's lives. The ease with which she can be manipulated and the resulted bias she operates with can at very least be described as dereliction of duty. Having no experience with children herself, it only adds the the above inexperience and insecurity that I have described. The result is very unprofessional and dangerous combination should you find yourself in her care. My suggestion is to look elsewhere.

Mary Murray is an exceptional attorney. She went above and beyond on our case. She's aggressive in…read morethe courtroom and leaves nothing on the table yet is compassionate and a beacon of light to her clients. If you want someone who will fight for you Mary Murray is the attorney you need!

Attorney Henry S, has handled several legal matters for me. Excellent representation and execution!read more

Emily is a wise and learned divorce attorney. She is a zealous advocate and worthy adversary. You…read morecannot go wrong in hiring Emily for your divorce or custody case. Two thumbs up!

Attorney Rhonda Jennings is your go-to person for Workers Comp injuries. She gets very good…read moreresults, and she always does professional, top-notch work for the client.

Mrs.Rhonda jennings has done and is doing an amazing job on my case. I would definitely recommend…read moreher services to family and friends! She gets back with you in a timely manner and tries her best to answer all your questions that you have.