Since first contacting Mr. Weissman I have since utilized his services and he is very professional.read more

From the owner: Missouri Real Estate closings, Tax Sale purchases, Foreclosures, real estate title and lien…read moredisputes. For over 30 years we have provided foreclosure services to banks, companies and individuals who have made home loans. Landlords have been using our services with immediate results by providing personalized assistance through the laws of landlord-tenant rights. There are times when the courts are your only recourse. We provide effective representation for all real estate matters and litigation. We provide our services in the St. Louis City, County, St. Charles, Jefferson County, Franklin County, and Lincoln County areas.

Excellent law firm! They communicate every step of the way, respond quickly, and truly care about…read moretheir clients. Their professionalism and dedication gave me peace of mind throughout the process. I highly recommend them! They are amazing!

At this firm, they prioritize getting the job done. The value of which you get as a client for this…read moreteams determination is well worth the price you'll pay. You don't have to go broke getting this kind of service though, you only need to go to Mandel & Mandel and tell them your legal trouble, and they will do their damnest to help you prevail. Mike Kelley is a phenomenal lawyer. Thank you for everything you've done. Highly recommend.

Best law firm in Saint Louis. Mark handled my case with ease. He went above and beyond to…read morecommunicate. I'll never use another firm.

I was not happy with the settlement that I got from the Attorney The Hammer, because it was than 6…read morefigures, over a robbery that happened to me and I had to replace my shoulder

I had never been in an accident before that involved me taking legal action. Rachel and Patrick…read morewere amazing! They listened to everything I had to say and showed much empathy toward my injury. Through each step of the way, a staff member from The Bradley Law Firm kept me up to date on my case. I recommend this firm to anyone who has had a car wreck or has recently been involved in one. They handled my case fast and got the most compensation they could for my injuries while working hard to lower my hospital bills. Very thankful to have them represent my case.

So this experience with the Bradley law firm that I had was actually the most painless, easy, and…read morehelpful process that I have ever endured or could've expected with a personal injury problem. I was never looking to make extra money, I was only concerned about the medical bills that Geico, the man's insurance that hit me, refused to pay any of them. It was instantly diagnosed that this accident had caused me to have a compression on my C4 Dash C5 vertebrae and a bulging desk. Potential he of course it can cause issues down the road but I am very proactive about taking care of what needs to be done to prevent that. I honestly am not one for lawyers at all, but Julia Kerr was above and beyond the expectations I ever had of any personal injury lawyer. Like I mentioned above I wasn't looking to get a $2 million settlement or really even anything, I just needed my bills paid from imaging and treatment of my compressed vertebrae/spinal cord. Julia Kerr has been more than helpful, does not waste your time or money, and is legitimately the most personable attorney you will ever meet. She completely understands the circumstances, what you need, and helps you create a quick (for that process and the BS it can entail w insurance companies) outcome that will at the VERY least get your bills paid if not more. I was thankful that she was able to get my lost time compensated (over 2 weeks of work, I was paid hourly at the time) which is very difficult to do from what I understand. But also Geico was refusing to pay all of it so we had to use my uninsured policy for other drivers to even pay the rest of my medical bills. She was efficient, responsive, and just amazingly helpful in every way possible. I work in healthcare so I know sometimes how certain personal injury attorneys can be (more money, who cares about time?!) and I have to say that she completely does not fit any sort of stereotype that you may have. With that being said I would recommend going to her in a heartbeat if you are in the similar situation that I was or if you are really really hurt and need assistance on how to handle the situation. She will do everything in her power, even if you did have to go to court, to make sure that you are getting a satisfied outcome. Thankfully we did not have to go to court, but let me put this in here under no circumstances do I EVER recommend Geico as a car insurance. EVER. Especially if this is how they handled the people they are not insured in an accident, I couldn't imagine what more of a nightmare it would be if you were actually insured by them. I thank god have State Farm and I will tell you, 100% you get what you pay for with car insurance. The Bradley Law Firm/Julia Kerr's paralegals, as well as the receptionists at this firm are also amazing and very easy to work with, they talk to you and they also make sure that you completely understand everything you need and if you don't they will contact whomever they need to to make sure that they give you the answer you were looking for. So as much as I hope that I am never in the situation again. If the problem arise I would go back to Julia and this law firm in a heartbeat. I highly recommend this law firm but I even more highly recommend Julia Kerr especially from this law firm.

I have used Attorney Robert for years He end up being my families attorney. We love the service. We…read morehave one plenty of our cases through Attorney Robert I couldn't say better things concerning Attorney Robert. He is awesome and services. Awesome. Even times when I did not have all the money he would erase it off.

He's cheap I guess you get what you pay for. Very unprofessional doesn't answer /return calls for…read moremonths. He's a liar and sheister. He doesn't do anything he says he will. He doesn't do any better than a public defender. Save yourself some cash and stick with a public defender. In my opinion he should stick to petty larceny and traffic tickets or maybe start chasing ambulances.This is based on what I've seen when he was hired for a relative of mine.

A very skilled professional that truly looks for the best interest of his clients. Hogan law has…read morebeen used for many of legal needs and have no issue referring him to friends family and others. Keep up the good work.

From the owner: Filing for divorce can be an overwhelming process--especially when you are trying to work through…read moreit on your own. This is why when you are going through divorce, it is important to contact a trusted and experienced divorce attorney. At Hogan Law Group, LLC, the team has been committed to helping individuals go through divorce and other family law proceedings for more than 20 years. The team recognizes that the individuals they work with are facing some of the most emotionally draining times in their lives, and they make sure each client is provided with the amount of individualized attention and compassionate service they deserve.

Simon Law Firm represented me in a medical malpractice complaint between the years 2019-2024 that…read morewas tried in the 21st Judicial Circuit in St. Louis County Missouri. Case # 19SL-CC04680. Lead counsel From February 2019 - June 2024 was Anthony R. Friedman Mo. Bar # 65531 and upon his withdrawal Elizabeth C. McNulty Mo. Bar # 71957 was appointed lead counsel. - After a failed mediated settlement agreement conference wherein at which time Friedman shared privileged information with opposing counsel and on December 22, 2025 a formal bar complaint was delivered to the Office Of Chief Disciplinary counsel naming Anthony R. Friedman as respondent citing several violations of the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct. Complainant Albert B. Pepper Jr. is now proceeding to compose a formal bar complaint naming Elizabeth C. McNulty, successor counsel as respondent also citing several violations of the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct. Multiple acts of nonfeasance, misfeasance and malfeasance were perpetrated upon their client Pepper by Friedman and it continued without remedy by McNulty and associate counsel up to, through and post trial. Evidence that support the O.C.D.C. complaints allegations are as follows: Telephone audio recordings, email correspondences, deposition transcripts, trial transcripts and case file. Any client or potential client would be well advised to document and retain everything including and specifically telephone audio recordings. The state of Missouri is a one party consent state: Under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.402,. Sincerely, Albert B. Pepper Jr. - litigant pro se consumer advocate - citizen journalist. at this time you may do a google key word search for Anthony R. Friedman attorney and receive links to my consumer advocacy site. When you read the narrative and the factually allegations of the systemic misconduct perpetrated on the plaintiff client Albert B. Pepper Jr. by The Simon Law Firm P.C. it will stagger the imagination.

The first time I've been laughed at by a female law firm employee taking notes for the person…read moreconducting the initial interview for a potential case I was bringing. Zack Zidzik, who interviewed me, did not appear to have read any information I had already provided about the case by questions he asked, seemed focused on the minutia and could not see the big picture I had outlined in detail for them in return email. Zack twice asked me to "tell him everything I knew in 30 seconds" about different key elements of a case that had been unfairly decided against me by HUD with many glaring errors on their part but had now become too big for me to handle alone. Or detail for him in 30 seconds. I wondered if this was a test of my communication skills, cognitive functioning or if he was trying to impress the female on staff taking notes by asking questions about statements made on HUD documents filed by someone else in 1981. Again, failing to see the big picture with no regard given to information provided showing more recent and relevant developments regarding that aspect of the case. I later called and asked to provide feedback on the interview but no interest was shown in it or a case they already turned down without any material case evidence allowed sent to or reviewed by them to evaluate the merits of my case.