I came here a few years ago, had to go to court to file for something and I would say the line and…read morewait is insane! However, I understand why it takes time and shouldn't be mad. Most of the staff are really nice, in the morning I see everyone say hi and greet each other warmly. The security breaks the ice so when you enter they help me feel at ease (not all of them but the ones I met were nice.). The long wait times and line is probably what most of the issues arise. It's a lot to go through and it can be confusing when our fate They have numbered rooms, benches, snack chops, directories, escalators and elevators, restrooms, cafeteria, and water dispensers. There are several entrances and exits, I'm used to the one at the 4th floor which enters through Grand Ave, but I forgot that it wasn't the first floor.

My review is based on my personal experience as a self-represented homeowner in Los Angeles…read moreSuperior Court, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 16, before Judge Steve Cochran. This has been one of the worst court-service experiences I have ever had. As a self-represented litigant dealing with serious homeowner safety issues, I felt unheard, dismissed, and trapped in a process that did not provide meaningful access to justice. I filed a civil case after paying Villa Bella Construction / Kip Connors approximately $103,000 for an ADU project that, in my experience, was left incomplete, unsafe, and damaged. My case involves serious construction issues, including unsafe electrical conditions, water intrusion, loss of use, and substantial mitigation costs. I had to pay more than $60,000 out of pocket to mitigate and repair dangerous conditions. My court filings also explain that I paid the contractor more than $100,000, the ADU remained incomplete and unusable, and my family was living with unsafe electrical conditions. What has been most frustrating is that my case was stayed for arbitration even though arbitration became financially inaccessible to me. I attempted to proceed in arbitration, but the required fees created a major barrier. Instead of being allowed to move forward in court, I was left stuck without a real merits forum -- not meaningfully in arbitration and not meaningfully in court. From my perspective, that is not justice. That is a procedural trap. This was not a simple private disagreement. The safety and regulatory facts were serious. CSLB investigated the contractor and, based on my understanding, referred the matter to the Attorney General's Office for disciplinary action / possible license revocation. OSHA and LADBS issues were also part of the broader record. In my view, this was a homeowner safety and accountability case involving alleged defective work, unsafe conditions, and major financial harm. I was also very disturbed by how the court treated the safety concerns connected to the contractor dispute. After I sued, there was a gun-threat issue involving the contractor, and I obtained a restraining order. In court, I felt the seriousness of that threat was minimized. My understanding of Judge Cochran's comment was essentially that people can get angry when they are sued. As a homeowner and mother already dealing with unsafe construction conditions, that was shocking to me and made me feel completely unprotected. The court process itself was also extremely frustrating. In my personal experience, some staff interactions felt rude, dismissive, and unhelpful. Getting basic procedural help or clear information as a self-represented person was far more difficult than it should be. On top of that, I was told the court reporter transcript could take approximately 5-6 weeks. In 2026, waiting more than a month for a transcript when a litigant is trying to seek writ review or protect their rights is unacceptable. If the system cannot provide timely transcripts, then the court needs serious modernization. At minimum, technology and AI-assisted transcription should be explored because the current process is painfully slow and outdated. I understand courts are busy and judges have difficult calendars. But from my experience, Department 16 did not adequately recognize the real-life impact of keeping a homeowner trapped in a stayed case where arbitration was financially inaccessible. The practical result felt extremely unfair: the contractor could avoid the civil case moving forward, while I remained responsible for emergency repairs, loss of use, and the cost of making my property safe. My honest experience with Stanley Mosk Courthouse and Department 16 left me feeling unheard, unprotected, and without meaningful access to justice. A self-represented homeowner should not be left in limbo for months when there are documented safety issues, major financial damages, a restraining-order issue, and an arbitration forum that closed because the fees were not affordable. Based on my personal experience, this court process felt cold, slow, dismissive, and deeply unfair to a self-represented homeowner trying to protect her family and property.

This was my first time serving Jury Duty downtown and I was dreading it, more so after reading…read morethese reviews. In the past, I've gotten jury summons from Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, West L.A., LAX, and Torrance courts. As it turned out, this courthouse wasn't that bad. I got used to the 10-15 minute walk from Disney Concert Hall for free parking. The parking garage lines moved fast upon entering and exiting with workers scanning the jury badge for you. The court security line was never long and it moved fast. The Jury Assembly Room was pleasant and spacious. Restrooms were clean. The workers I encountered were nice and efficient. The worst part of this courthouse was definitely the elevators. Prepare to wait!!

I am an American I fought in OEF and OIF. This legal system set me up I figured out I was being set…read moreup and mitigated as much as a could but it still resulted with a misdemeanor. When I went to court someone from the prosecution yelled "so you think you got away with it, I'll show you" hand to God. Then they made it next to impossible to complete my community service. Employees of this courthouse even called me up and teased me. This court is corrupt. It break my heart to say that out loud. These people do not care about the Constitution or this country. The judges shuffle things around so they can avoid responsibility from their corruption.

JURY SERVICE I hate…read morethis location, so I tried to switch my court venue for Jury Service. Unless you have to take more than three buses to get here or you have a medical excuse, forget it. On the plus side, there are fewer courtrooms here than Stanley Mosk, so you have a better chance of getting dismissed. Parking is right beneath the building. Show your jury summons, and you can park for free. There are plenty of spaces, but it is like a dungeon - dark! I found the elevator and took it to the first floor. Then, I had to get out, exit the building, and go through security. The line was short, and the process was quick. Then, I took an elevator to the 8th floor to the Jury Room. It's big and comfortable, but we aren't allowed to take photos of it. They way they handle juries is different than the last time I was here. We were told there are two groups - a morning panel and an afternoon panel. I was in the morning panel. Within 30 minutes, we were separated into two groups and sent to a department. Everything is done by number, probably to preserve anonymity, so the informative baliff had us line up in numerical order. I was number 2, so I thought I would be in and out of there promptly. Nope. Now, they interview everyone on the panel, which was about 38 people, before dismissing anyone. Once we took our assigned seats, the judge thanked us and gave us a rundown on how things were going to proceed. Then, she excused us for lunch. Unless you're a fast food junkie, pack yours! There is no cafeteria here, and the vending machines are pathetic. There was one food truck outside, and McDonald's and Subway were across the street on Washington Blvd. It's a food desert. When we returned at 1:30PM, we each had to stand up and answer a list of 11 heavy duty questions since it was a DUI case. It was fascinating and surprising to hear some of the answers. By the end of the day, everyone had responded, and we were instructed to return the next morning at 10:30AM. Beware: my courtroom, Department 75 is a meat locker, so bring a ski jacket! Plus, the air conditioner makes cringy inconsistent sounds that are annoying. The building itself is old and feels antiquated, but it gets the job done. The next day, once we were seated, the judge dismissed a number of people. I wasn't one of them. Then, the defense attorney spoke to us. She asked us all a few specific questions, and we had to respond by raising our hand, or not. Then, she asked certain people about their responses. Next, the prosecutor described his method. He, too, asked the group questions, which we replied by raising our hands, or not. Then, he asked particular people things. When that was over, the prosecutor dismissed one person. Then the defense attorney dismissed me. I had to return to the 8th floor to pick up that all-important piece of paper proving I had served for two days. All in all, employees at this courthouse were kind and helpful. Thankfully, everyone tries to make this experience as efficient as possible. Civic duty done!

Many people hate courthouses and it seems this one in particular because they associate them with…read morenegative experiences like traffic court, fines, involuntary jury duty, or the like. But it isn't the courthouse's fault! As far as courthouses go, this one is decent, even though it is getting a bit old and isn't in the best area of the city. There is ample parking in the area, and it is much cheaper than the other downtown courthouse (Stanley Mosk). The interior is clean and isn't really falling apart (yet), though it was clearly built in the 1970s or 1980s. Security to get in is typically quite efficient. Also, make sure to check the location of your courtroom - just because it says Department 65, does not mean it is on the sixth floor! That particular department is on the third floor by the way. As far as courthouses go, this place could be much worse. Four stars easily.

Office of the Registrar-Recorder is on Burton Way in Beverly Hills. This office is an extension to…read morethe BH courthouse. Parking on Redford Drive is free for 1 hour and there are limited metered parking spots. As many times as I've been here, this here is my first review. Most of the posted reviews are from people who were newly married and registered their coupledom commitment at this office and had pleasant experiences...because well, they just got married and are looking to live life happily ever after ...and I say Good Luck that...lol. The high divorce statistics are against you, maybe or maybe not, you'll be back in this courthouse to probably file for Divorce :( This office has nice helpful staff, but never enough pre and post COVID. This office is where you also pay for all the fines, court fees and parking related offenses and penalties. With all the parking and 'alleged' speeding tickets I've gotten, I feel I'm supporting the parking department :(( Out in the hallway of this office are a couple computers for public use to manage your case/file/violation online, and if the computer system is not down and is functioning/operational, I suggest you manage it online and PRINT a receipt for your PROOF. That saves you time, a trip to this recorder's office and shortens the long wait time here. While in line, sometimes a staffer will help and advise you and sometimes will help resolve your issue on the spot. With the ongoing COVID pandemic, most municipal courthouse and offices are closed, but I am glad this office is open even if hours are limited.

My entire experience at Beverly Hills court was great!! Our marriage license took like 10 mins…read more Little line and friendly fast service. I scheduled my court ceremony for the following week Wednesday at 11:30am.. Ok confession time: I was 45 mins late because (traffic) and our marriage officiant left to lunch. The rules are if you're late you must reschedule.. But after the receptionist screamed at me for being late she was able to squeeze me in at 1:30pm :)) I was so thankful!!! I got married last Wednesday and my officiant was funny and sweet! Chapel is classy and chic with Hollywood glam black and white wedding portraits. My husband and I are so happy with everything, this is the best place to get married!

Charming architecture and so many beautiful photo opportunities. I especially love using the…read morestaircase and the dramatic lighting for timeless black-and-white portraits. It's a great choice for couples who want a wedding location that feels aesthetic, intimate, and visually special rather than just like a government building.

This has to be the cutest little courthouse! With a family member that's really into history, this…read morehistorical building is worth a visit. This old courthouse was such a beautiful backdrop for the couples getting married here. It has a wonderful feeling of nostalgia, a very friendly and helpful staff, and great parking nearby. This courthouse has a cute little museum inside as well. Although I didn't get to see it on this last visit, I can't wait to see it on our next trip the historical buildings in old town Santa Ana!

The historic and architecturaly impressive Pasadena City Hall is a must see when visiting…read morePasadena,California! The Pasadena City Hall building is beautiful from both sides of the structure as well as through the hallways and interior areas as well! The City Hall makes for a terrific family or solo visit and features loadsof photo ops! This City Hall is so picturesque that professional photographers use the City Hall as the background for stunning wedding and portrait images! Nearby is downtown Pasadena with lots to do,see,eat,drink and shop for a wonderful days visit! Plenty of parking and lodging nearby to stay after the day is done! Highly recommended! . . . #pasadenacityhall #Pasadena #crowncity #ilovepasadena #godisgood

Pasadena's City Hall feels more like a state capitol than a small city government building. It is…read moregorgeous and well worth a visit. The front and back (east and west) are most impressive. There is an interior courtyard and, during daylight hours, you can often walk up the stairs in the corners for even better photos. The only problem is that it is so photogenic that it is often overrun by photo shoots. It can be touching to observe so many people celebrating their special moment here. It can also be challenging to simply enjoy the space as a member of the public when every spot and vantage point is in someone's portrait. Tip: If you are visiting from out of town, be sure to cross Euclid to Plaza Las Fuentes, where there are more fountains and interesting tiles (a Pasadena feature), plus a great view of City Hall (near California Pizza Kitchen). In the other direction, across Garfield, visit the Robinson Memorial.

I never thought I'd be leaving a 5-star review for a municipal service, but Rosa and Treece (I hope…read moreI spelled her name correctly!) at the 6th floor clerks office were truly fantastic. I got married this weekend and went to turn in my marriage certificate form. I had made an error on the form and both Rosa and Treece were so wonderful, working with me to ensure I was able to rectify any issues before departing for my honeymoon. Each time I've gone to this office, they've been efficient and helpful.

Made an appointment last week on-line to pick up Vital Records and was given assined an appointment…read morewithin a few days. Was in and out of building in 10min. Parking is $10 flat fee and limited spaces are available. Metal screening takes place on the first floor so be prepared to leave most personal items at home. Elevators are roomy and clean but do take a bit of time. At the 6th floor for vital records there is an attendant screening people for walk-in or appointment visits and directs visitors to the appropriate line which definitely expedites the process. Aside from the ridiculous parking fee a pleasant visit given the fast service.

My experience with the PPA was extremely disappointing and highlighted serious flaws in both the…read moreprocess and the judgment of the assigned assessor, Cristina Vasquez. Communication was inconsistent, follow‑through was minimal, and I had to repeatedly reach out just to get basic clarity. But the most concerning issues came from the assessment itself. During the interview, Cristina claimed that I "knew the PPA date," which is simply not true. While a date had been tentatively set, the respondent failed to appear, and the judge clearly stated on the record that the PPA could not move forward until she filed her waiver. That instruction came directly from the court, not from me. Cristina dismissed this fact and delivered her response in a condescending tone, as if I had ignored instructions that never existed. The interview she conducted was surface‑level. She didn't witness the actual behavior that matters, including the emotional escalation and statements my daughter has made. Important issues were mentioned once and never followed up on. The evaluation relied on brief snapshots instead of the full reality, and it showed. What makes this even more troubling is Cristina's final recommendation. She decided it was appropriate to uproot my children from the only stable home they've ever had in California, their school, their medical providers, their routines, and their entire extended family, and move them to another state with only their mother and no other family support whatsoever. Every member of their mother's family lives here in Los Angeles, not in Oregon. The recommendation ignores their history, their stability, and the actual facts presented. If you're expecting a thorough, balanced, or reality‑based evaluation, that was not my experience. The process is flawed, the interview is incomplete, and the final recommendation does not reflect the children's best interests or the facts of their lives.

Don't bother with this courthouse unless you are ordered to appear here. Liberal judges like Jerry…read moreB Marshak act based upon their feelings and not based upon the actual evidence. In fact he did not even look at the evidence and was furious when I did not know it had to be submitted via portal. He said that I escalated a situation at Home Depot by not showing my receipt. Imagine that a judge saying that a Home Depot associate has the right to tell you to stop and drop everything in order to prove you've already paid for items that are yours despite a receipt in hand. Additionally my court case was supposed to be at 10am but despite getting there early I did not leave court until 3:30pm.

I reported for jury duty here. Your designated jury parking is located at the Disney Concert Hall a…read moremile away. I definitely got my steps in but there's a Dash bus available if you don't want to walk. I'm told it's a historical court house. The bathroom still had their old fixtures, however, the sinks had modern sensored faucets. The cafe on the basement level was expensive. $10 bucks for a dinky sandwich and a bottle of water. On day two, I walked to grab dim sum in Chinatown not too far away. It was definitely better than a dinky sandwich.

I got assigned here for Jury Duty. Just know that going through security here is more strict…read morebecause it's a superior court building. So you'll have to show photo ID and then put all your cables and electronic device on the tray to go through x-ray. This include laptops and iPad so they can't stay in your bag or backpack. You don't have to take off your shoes so that's a good thing. Getting mobile reception here is horrible so just be aware. I have Tmobile and is assigned to the 2nd level, there certain spots where you'll get signal but if just barely take a step, you can lose your signal. In the courtroom, you'll have to use a microphone so it can transmit through the speaker and people can hear you. The bathroom layout here is also bad because the women bathroom and men bathroom are across the hall from each other. There also no cafeteria here either so you'll have to go across the street to Los Angeles Mall or another food place.

I've been dealing with my DV case with my ex for over 5 years. The entire experience opened my eyes…read moreinto why it's one of the reasons victims don't want to press charges. They make you regret pressing the charges. My ex abused me for years, left bruises, scars, scratches and busted my mouth multiple times. From the beginning the DA didn't think I should present any evidence of past behavior, I wasn't even allowed to speak upon my behalf of the ordeal I went through. They changed my DA every couple months WITHOUT informing me, the DA's would not call me to update me on anything regarding my case. Just to get updates, I had to consistently call whichever DA was assigned to my case and if I ever received a call back, it was like pulling teeth trying to get answers. All the way until the very end, the DA's are beyond useless and make you feel pathetic or act annoyed for even asking for help or information. The whole ordeal with this court made me feel more broken afterward. Out of the many DA's I had maybe ONE DA actually had empathy and tried. It breaks my heart for anyone else that is in my position having to deal with this courthouse & their DA's.

Manager there is rude and condescending. I think she said her name was Tanya. Blonde Clerk at the…read morewindow was very sweet