Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Ashling Soares Law

    5.0 (4 reviews)
    Open Open 24 hours
    Updated 1 month ago

    Services - Ashling Soares Law

    Business litigation

    Consumer litigation

    Divorce law

    6 More Services

    Employment litigation

    Entertainment litigation

    Family and estates law

    Family law

    IP and internet litigation

    General litigation

    Ashling Soares Law Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Ashling Soares Law

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration
    Photo of Nora W.
    286
    3
    0

    8 months ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    6 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Mrs. C.
    50
    24
    0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Ashling Soares Law

    You might also consider

    Needle & Cuda Divorce & Family Law

    Needle & Cuda Divorce & Family Law

    3.2
    (9 reviews)

    I recently consulted with Alex Cuda regarding a child support enforcement matter -- a…read moremagistrate-level proceeding, not a complex litigation case, with a relatively limited procedural framework. I came prepared with documentation and ensured his office received my materials the day before the consultation. Throughout the meeting, he did not appear to refer to anything I had submitted, and based on the questions he asked, it did not seem that he had reviewed my materials or even looked up the docket number I had provided in advance. For someone billing $800 per hour, the lack of preparation was difficult to reconcile with the certainty with which he spoke. When discussing the case, he would isolate a single detail from its broader context and dwell on it at length despite having access to the full documentation. That isolated point would then become the basis for a sweeping and dismissive conclusion delivered with great confidence, though the actual record did not appear to support it. When I asked direct questions -- what does that mean, how does that fit into the case -- the responses often became more legal terminology rather than clearer explanation. The effect was less analytical than evasive. What was especially striking was the level of authority and detail he brought to describing the opposing party's supposed strengths while not appearing to have meaningfully reviewed the materials I had provided. The confidence with which he characterized a case he had not actually examined was itself notable. Throughout the consultation, his $20,000 retainer surfaced repeatedly and often unprompted -- not as a routine disclosure or in response to specific questions, but almost as a refrain. In the context of a child support enforcement matter in magistrate court, the repetition felt less informational than performative. There was also a persistent dismissiveness to his manner -- at times less like professional detachment and more like open condescension -- unlike anything I experienced with any other attorney I consulted. Most tellingly, after nearly an hour, I had to ask him myself whether I should request a continuance -- one of the most basic procedural considerations available under the circumstances. That it never arose independently during the consultation says a great deal about what the meeting actually produced. I left without a strategy, without a coherent framework, and without the level of guidance that should be the minimum expectation of a paid legal consultation.

    I contacted Needle & Cuda seeking legal help for a serious and urgent matter specifically because…read morethe firm handles domestic violence cases. I was honestly appalled by how I was treated, particularly by an intake staff member named Allison. I was initially told twice that someone would call me back, and no one ever did. When I called a third time, I spoke with Allison and she told me the reason she didn't return either call was because their "system was messed up because of the snow." I explained my situation and, toward the end of the call, mentioned that my prior attorney was requiring me to sign an appearance form before returning my retainer. I told her I was seeking legal advice about how to handle this because I didn't know whether I should sign the form or whether new counsel would file their own appearance. I made it clear that this was something I intended to discuss during the paid consultation, which I understood would cost between $650 and $1,300. Allison responded in a rude and dismissive tone: "We don't do that. Get your retainer back and then we'll schedule a consultation." I explained that I did not need my previous retainer returned in order to retain the firm and that I was prepared to pay their $25,000 retainer if I decided to move forward after the consultation. She then said she would call or email me to schedule it. I waited a couple of days and never heard back. Because I urgently needed legal assistance, I called Needle & Cuda again. During that call, I was told the firm likely could not take me as a client "because of the retainer issue," even though I had already clarified that I was prepared to pay their retainer. Despite reiterating that, I was told to call back later to schedule the consultation instead of simply scheduling it while I was already on the phone. When I followed those instructions and called back later that day, someone answered the phone and immediately hung up on me. I waited to see if it was a mistake and called back a few minutes later, but the phone just rang with no answer. The entire interaction was extremely disrespectful and unprofessional, especially given the seriousness of a domestic violence-related custody matter. Respectful communication during intake should be the bare minimum, and I do not understand why I was given the runaround instead of a clear answer. I cannot speak for the attorneys themselves, but based on my experience with the intake staff, I would strongly recommend looking elsewhere if you are seeking responsiveness, professionalism, or even basic courtesy. If this experience does not reflect how Needle & Cuda intends to treat potential clients in serious legal situations, I hope the partners review how intake calls are being handled.

    Maya Murphy PC

    Maya Murphy PC

    3.5
    (13 reviews)

    **Caution Advised Before Retaining This Firm**…read more Based on my experience with Maya Murphy, LLP, I cannot recommend their services. My full story is below if you care to read on, but here are alternative firms to engage in CT and NY: **Connecticut** * Lucas and Varga, LLC: [https://lucasvargalaw.com](https://lucasvargalaw.com) * Richard L. Pate Law Offices: [https://www.richardlpateconnecticutemploymentlawyer.com](https://www.richardlpateconnecticutemploymentlawyer.com) **New York** * Granovsky & Sundaresh PLLC: [https://g-s-law.com](https://g-s-law.com) * Phillips & Associates: [https://www.newyorkcitydiscriminationlawyer.com](https://www.newyorkcitydiscriminationlawyer.com) While initial consultations were promising and the firm appeared engaged after I paid a \$5,000 retainer, the quality of service quickly declined. Communication became sporadic, and billing lacked transparency--there were long stretches with no updates, followed by a sudden, substantial bill. After partial payment, they indicated they would no longer negotiate on my behalf unless the outstanding amount was paid in full. At several points, it appeared the firm prioritized their fees over my case. Promises of strong representation and an optimistic outcome did not materialize. In fact, the handling of the matter ultimately weakened my position, and the final settlement amount covered mostly legal fees--with little benefit to me as a client. Key issues I experienced include: * Long periods with no attorney contact * Last-minute reassignment to a different lawyer with little context * Missed or delayed meetings * Poor communication and apparent lack of case familiarity * Settlement pressure with little room for discussion These concerns mirror those raised in other negative reviews. I urge potential clients to research thoroughly and consider alternative firms before proceeding. This review reflects my personal experience and is intended to help others make informed decisions.

    Despite the glowing reviews, Lauren Jacobson's legal representation was a huge disappointment. For…read morealmost a year, all we saw was a huge number of "filings" and no results. What should have been a straightforward lawsuit became a maze of questionable legal maneuvers which appeared to have no purpose but to extend the litigation and charge us for it. She once even increased her hourly fee and never bothered to even mention it to us. No rapport with us, only legal bills. Would not recommend her legal help.

    Von Kohorn Law Firm

    Von Kohorn Law Firm

    5.0
    (12 reviews)

    Awesome Lawyer. Here's why... - Initial Free Interview was…read morevery informative and professional. I had 6 phone call conversations + 3 formal interviews and selected JVK out of the 10 lawyers. Some lawyers made a lot of promises in the initial discussion and acted like sharks that wanted to hire private investigators without really listening to me. - Organized & Clean office. I loved walking into a tidy, well-organized office. Some lawyers I interviewed had an absolute mess of papers. He had small reminders of his family and explained why it was important to him. JVK is a man of great character. - Underpromise & Overdeliver - this cliche is a big thing to me. JVK set realistic expectations and timeline for my divorce. Too many of my friends were overpromised by lawyers and invested way too much for less than what was promised. JVK set the goal for a divorce in under 12 months and got it done in about 8 months (December signed with him and served the spouse that month. I was divorced in August). It would have been sooner if the ex didn't delay providing documents. - Calm and Logical - this is super important. When my ex dialed up the emotion and ridiculousness, JVK calmed me down and was not affected by the ex's ridiculous comments or insults at the two of us. JVK knows people make logical decisions when the anger is removed from the decision making. - Billing is extremely fair. No nickel and diming for every little text and email. JVK understood the games being played by my spouse, so he took that into consideration when billing me. Too many friends feel they got billed by the word - not by the email. AWESOME LAWYER. We need more JVK's in divorces so they go efficiently. I am a better person after having used him.

    No one enters a marriage expecting a divorce, and the anxiety of the process is overwhelming. If…read moreyou are in Fairfield County, Jon Von Kohorn is the only lawyer to consider. He navigated my case against a difficult ex and opposing lawyer with incredible expertise, kindness, and class. Jon is direct, his rates are reasonable, and he realistically manages expectations. I've also referred several friends to him with great success. He has excellent reviews for a reason, and I am forever grateful to have been one of his many satisfied clients. My life is on a much better track now, thanks to Jon and the work he does.

    Richard H Raphael

    Richard H Raphael

    2.0
    (4 reviews)

    If I could give this attorney 10 stars I would do so. He is honest, knowledgeable, dedicated and…read moregoes far beyond what is necessary. I used him for medical malpractice in 2009 and his compassion was only outdone by his expertise. E have now had to engage his services for family member going through a nasty divorce. He truly deserves a lot of recognition and accolades for serving his clients as though we were family. God bless you!

    Richard is the worst. I hired him for a medical mal-practice lawsuit that caused my husband's…read moreuntimely demise. There is only a two-year statute of limitation to file a claim. I trusted Richard with all his empty promises. He did nothing but procrastinate for a year and a half. At my insistence, he organized a three-way conference call with himself, the expert and me so I could explain my side to the expert. WHILE on this conference call, Richard was driving himself to a Dr's appt. In the middle of my conversation with the expert, Richard chimes in and says he has to end the call because he had arrived at his dr's office. This is just one example of his many unprofessional behaviors. I had one month left to file a claim or else I would lose my opportunity. I called Richard upset at how sloppily he was handling my case. His response was, " you're just a grieving wife thinking with your emotions instead of accepting the facts." Those words hit me harder than the death of my husband. I told him to gather my records that I would be coming in to retrieve them. There are many more other examples I could give, but then this review would go on forever. I will end it with this; Richard should consider retirement because he sucks as an attorney!!!!!!

    Ashling Soares Law - divorce - Updated June 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...