What an amazing immigration attorney!!! He helped me with my case, my kids cases and my mother…read morecase. He is very professional and knowledgeable. Very honest and he always treat us with maximum respect and give us all his attention.

Farrokh Parsi is the type of attorney who consistently puts his clients ahead of himself. His work…read moreis both thoughtful and thorough.

I cannot recommend Kelsey Zubkoff and her team highly enough From the very beginning, Kelsey made…read morewhat felt impossible finally feel achievable. For 20 years, I was skeptical and afraid to pursue my U.S. citizenship. In just five minutes, Kelsey encouraged me, believed in me, and completely changed my mindset. That single conversation led me to take a step I had avoided for decades Not only did she guide me through the entire process, but she also helped me study, prepare, and feel confident--and I passed Her dedication went far beyond paperwork. Kelsey and her team were always available to answer my questions (and there were many!), and they never once made me feel alone. Throughout the entire journey, they stood by my side with patience, compassion, and unwavering support They made me feel like I didn't just have a legal team, but a family behind me--encouraging me every step of the way. If you are looking for an immigration attorney who is knowledgeable, compassionate, and truly invested in your success, Kelsey Zubkoff is the one She truly makes the impossible possible.

hi I had scheduled a meeting for an immigration matter with…read moreKelsey Zubkoff. first she was late 25 minutes was not sure if she wants to come on zoom chat or a call she was texting back and forth and finally we connected after almost 25 minutes via phone call. I told her my case details and I told her my case no which she put in and told me that CEAC system is down, she was laughing and gigling like she doing me a favour. I logged in myself while ehe was on call and I was able to log in succesffuly and tell her msg as what I am seeing. I told her to change broswer clear cookies and try again and she started giving me crap as she does this all day and I dont need to tell her. She also told me that I am not paying her she was totally rude and non professional and at that time I have to break my attitude and give her a lime light. She is totally non professional and I believe racist. I am expresss my concerns of her doing business. I have fired her and will not give her any business moving forward. Shame on these lawyers who things people calling are low life. I have fired you and perhaps a lesson for you to have your act straight and shame on you. You are fired

Vanessa is a 10/10 immigration lawyer! My family and I are beyond thankful for all of her help so…read morefar. My dad lived with residency status uncertainty for many years before working with Vanessa. Within a year of working together he was able to finally receive his Permanent Resident Card! Vanessa helped us navigate the filing process with diligence and care. What you can expect: - Transparent pricing - Clear, concise explanation of the state of your case and what to expect next - She's highly communicative - She's very empathetic We will continue to work with Vanessa for all future legal needs and recommend her services to anyone in need of immigration legal advice.

Terrific immigration attorney. My wife and I couldn't be happier to work with Ms. Black. She is…read morevery competent in her specialty, and was able to advise us, and to resolve our case quickly. Thank you.

Me and my husband were in a total loss car accident and we used Horan Law Offices. It was the best…read moreexperience. Mr. Horan was very thorough and checked in frequently. Whenever we needed assistance he was always there. He explained the process from beginning to end so we were well informed. Very professional. Brisa was amazing to work with very on top of our law suit. We weren't expecting the settlement amount we got which was a nice surprise and far exceeded our expectations. I would recommend their services to anyone. Many years of practicing law and definitely knows his stuff!! Thank you Mr. Horan and Brisa!! Appreciate all you have done for our family. SS

From the owner: Experienced and aggressive law firm in Phoenix Arizona. Firm handles personal injury, criminal…read morelaw, business matters, family law and divorce and immigration cases throughout Arizona

Saw an ad on FB. Joseph Woods took my call. On a Sunday afternoon. While with his family. Not a…read moreparalegal, not a service, HIM. And gave me some great advise that I can use and really needed. It is obvious he cares. Amazing.

Condescending, dismissive and annoyed by my simply requesting a return call. He seemed to have no…read moreawareness of my case, put ME on the defensive for asking why he wouldn't hire expert witnesses, and resorted to "mansplaining" things he neither researched nor understood about the defendants. He had the audacity to say nobody has ever won a case with structural deficiency-based low frequency claims (among so many other code violations) in their complaint, and presenting evidence of such would "weaken my case." I pulled case law with precedents and here's what it said: "Yes, California tenants have won cases regarding low-frequency noise (such as industrial hums, equipment vibrations, and severe bass) by pursuing claims for nuisance and breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment. Landlords have a legal obligation to provide a habitable property and address conditions that substantially interfere with daily living. While specific, published California appellate court rulings rarely mention the precise colloquial term "low-frequency thrumming," tenants have won landmark cases under the broader umbrella of vibrations, low-frequency bass, and structural mechanical humming. In residential law, these are litigated under breach of the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment and nuisance. Tenants win these cases because courts rule that a landlord's failure to address intrusive physical or acoustic disruptions constitutes a "constructive eviction" (making the unit legally unlivable)." Fendley v. City of Anaheim (1930) 110 Cal.App. 731 Varjabedian v. City of San Joaquin (1977) 20 Cal.3d 285 Stoiber v. Honeychuck (1980) 101 Cal.App.3d 903 And here's what the LA Housing Department City Planning site itself had to say: The "dBA" vs. "dBC" Trap: Most city police departments measure noise using the "dBA" scale, which mimics human hearing and filters out low frequencies. Tenants who lose cases usually rely on police reports that say "no violation found." Tenants who win bring independent acoustic experts who measure in dBC or Hertz, proving the thrumming bypasses walls and physically shakes the air inside the home. He also asserted "Management companies and landlords pay settlements from their insurance policies. Their policy limit is all you can ask for in damages." Yet according to California Apartment Association ... "No. Standard landlord insurance policies generally exclude coverage for illegal short-term rentals and do not cover intentional violations of lease agreements or local laws. If a landlord conducts illegal short-term rentals and is forced to pay a legal settlement or penalty to their long-term tenant, they will almost always have to pay out-of-pocket. Why Insurance Companies Deny This Coverage Intentional Acts Exclusion: Liability and property insurance is designed to cover accidents, not intentional, knowing violations of law or lease agreements. Renting out a unit illegally or committing an unlawful eviction is considered a deliberate, willful act." So whether he's untruthful or just naive to case law, caveat emptor.