Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Services - Bold Patents

    Patent law

    IP and internet litigation

    Bold Patents Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Bold Patents

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    6 months ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    5 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    8 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Bold Patents

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    Get access to customer & competitor insights.

    Verify this business

    Haas Law

    Haas Law

    (13 reviews)

    Pioneer Square

    Lots of great reviews but honestly i think they were there just for the money or just hugely NOT…read morecompetent at all. I had an issues with an insurance claim, them denying my claim even though they couldn't prove they weren't liable. I was very clear from the start that my moving company made the insurance with the insurance company and that I did not have any documentation regarding the Pick-Up but only regarding my Drop-Off. 1. Phone consultation with Maureen, of course she can't predict the outcome but the consultation was quite specific as to know if there was a strong case, which she said there was, she also said the proof of being liable or not, was on the insurance company side that's why they have investigators. 2. Philip Haas calls, I find out that Maureen is not my lawyer but he will be, never spoke to him before and with a non-disclosed speech impediment that makes communication hugely hard (first bad sign, she should have contacted me telling me and asking if that was ok before taking a non refundable deposit). 3. You would think that if you change your clients lawyer without consulting with the client you'd provide every bit of information that very client provided you; NO, not the case, Philip Haas started doing his own without even consulting first and knowing half of the case; I got mad and made him aware of it and he apologized saying Maureen didn't send him the info (hugely unprofessional and once again a very bad sign); because I did send details by email there were no way you could dispute it so he wrote off what he charged me so far with whatever he did without consulting me first and then made out a strategy plan with me starting from zero (that was well appreciated but not encouraging). 4. If you know the case and set up a strategy but then a month later forget about details regarding that case...VERY BAD SIGN. Philip Haas blamed it on the fact they just had a new born and thanked me for reminding him the details of my case and because of that now he would re-contact the insurance company (he should have done that immediately as soon as he got another "claim denied"). 5. Out of the blue turns out that the burden of proof that the insurance company is liable or not, is on me and not on the insurance company so even though the insurance company can't prove they aren't liable, I have to prove they are by providing documents of the truck and driver that did my pick-up... SURPRISE! So my lawyer knowing from the start I did not have any documents alike as I specified from the beginning with Maureen, at the very end let's me know I have the burden of proof which, not having documents is clear that there is no case at all then, that's just common sense right? ... can you prove in a very specific way who the driver and truck type is? NO, you don't have a case, so why on earth would you take a case knowing there is no case? Because you mislead and was there for the money OR just were hugely incompetent not knowing what you were doing. Philip Haas insists they didn't mislead, which can be true but that just means they were hugely incompetent then, which one is it? A. The insurance company have to prove they are not liable and if they can't the burden for compensation is on them at least partially. (Maureen) -" knowing I didn't have documentation to prove specifics regarding the pick-up driver and truck type. Or B. You have to prove the insurance company is liable (even though you were insured) in order for them to compensate you by providing documents of who the driver and truck type was (Philip) Both are contradicting each other and therefore misleading or simply pure incompetence in the matter. Federal court? That was an option it would just have been hugely costly and time consuming and no guarantee of anythings pf course. Bad experience and a huge waste of money!

    Wonderful experience It was absolutely a pleasure working…read morewith Haas Law. They took their time explaining everything in detail. I would definitely recommend using them as your lawyer.

    Choquette Immigration Law Group

    Choquette Immigration Law Group

    (151 reviews)

    Leschi

    Update: We had another successful (and quick) green card application for a family member via Paul…read moreand Choquette Law Group. Would highly recommend them. ------ We had an amazing experience with Paul and Choquette Law Group. Paul helped us with green card application for my wife and the entire experience was smooth and quick! After the introductory call, Paul and his team helped us gather the right information, collected the information from us and filed the application. Throughout, they answered any questions we had and provided us with guidance where needed. In the end, the process went super smooth and without any issues. Would highly recommend Paul and Choquette Law Group!

    We decided to work with a lawyer after our immigration paperwork kept getting pushed back. Our…read morewedding certificate was three months late, then it was tax season, then we moved -- and honestly, our ability to focus on an application you really can't make mistakes on just wasn't there. For peace of mind, we felt it was worth hiring a lawyer to make sure everything was done correctly. After doing our research, we chose Paul Choquette. During our consultation, Paul was very blunt, upfront, and no-BS about our case, the process, and our situation. There was no sugarcoating, which I know can be intimidating for some people. I've seen reviews that mention his personality as a negative, but personally, we really appreciated it. He is also a kind person, and his directness gave us a lot of confidence that he knew exactly what he was doing and could handle our case well. Everything included in Paul's package made us feel extremely comfortable throughout the process. We started with the consultation, then completed his detailed questionnaire so he had everything he needed to prepare our paperwork correctly. Once we received our interview date, we had an online meeting to prepare for the interview, and Paul was also present in the room with us during the interview itself. Our interview only took about five minutes because Paul had already uploaded all of our documents to the immigration portal ahead of time. The agent had reviewed everything before we even walked in and only needed to ask standard questions. We were approved the same day and now have my green card. Paul was available and responsive at every step, answering all of our questions whether by email or phone. We always felt supported and informed, which made what could have been a very stressful process feel smooth and manageable. If you can embrace his blunt personality, you'll gain a kind, competent, thorough, confidence-building, and reassuring lawyer who will take great care of your case. I highly recommend Paul specifically, and Choquette Immigration Law Group as a whole. We absolutely plan on returning when we need help with my 10-year green card.

    Dubin Law Group - Our new logo!

    Dubin Law Group

    (66 reviews)

    Greenwood, Phinney Ridge

    Unfortunately, I experienced a Catastrophic Injury and was misdiagnosed at two [2] Washington State…read moreHospitals in Lynnwood and Everett. I was taken by Ambulance after I called 911 to the first Hospital and the ER Doctor and Radiologist informed me I Dislocated my Left Shoulder and suffered a fracture of the Humerus Bone. They did NOT have the appropriate Surgical Room so they transferred me by Ambulance to the LEVEL 2 TRAUMA CENTER in Everett. The ER Doctor and Radiologist re-confirmed the same Diagnosis. It turned ALL four [4] of these so-called"Professionals" were 100% WRONG! A member of the Orthopedic Surgeon Team showed me the X-Rays and informed me I had a SHATTERED HUMERUS BONE which CANNOT be repaired. Additionally, I was informed by both Hospitals that they knew of NOBODY qualified to perform the appropriate Surgical Procedure in ALL of the State of Washington. They DISCHARGED AND WISHED ME THE BEST OF LUCK...THAT WAS BEYOND INSULTING AND DEVASTATING NEWS!!!! I tried for a week in WA to find a Surgeon to review my case with NO LUCK! I decided to return to my home State of California. Meanwhile the Motel where the incident took place STONE WALLED ME AND THREATENED TO CALL THE POLICE AND EVICT ME when I requested an Incident Report. After speaking with numerous national Law Firms that advertise on TV and Radio they advised me they don't do this type of case. Fortunately I got a referral to the Dubin Law Firm and was very pleasantly surprised at the warm welcome and promptly spoke to an Attorney. I was informed that they will seek the appropriate justice which was MUSIC TO MY EARS!!! I read many of the reviews ALL of them spoke highly about Matt Dubin Law Firm! My personal experiences with the Team at Dubin Law Office has been highly Transparent, Professional and Honest Answers to my Questions and Concerns! Like I have told my family, I hope you NEVER need Dubin Legal Services, but when the legally responsible parties refuses to cooperate and reimburse me for my medical bills, then DON'T hesitate to call the Professionals @ Dubin Law Firm! Thank you for taking the time to read about my mmisfortunate accident and the expedient Legal Representation I am now happily receiving! Richard

    Hardly no communication with the lawyer and when I did talk to him he gave me the wrong information…read moreabout the amount of money one of the insurance co. offered (ANDREW) was the attoney. I asked to speak to Matt. but was denied do not retain this firm for any thing very disappointed with the customer service NO! NO! NO!

    Bold Patents - patentlaw - Updated September 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...