I do not know anything about any attorneys in this firm except Timbes…read moreI was very dissatisfied with Mr. Timbes what he did for me But mostly what he did not do for me. I wrote a review sometime ago and asked if Mr. Timbes could contact me to discuss and as of today I have heard nothing

When I first contacted this law firm, I was so hopeful they would help me to the fullest of the…read moreextent they could and made me feel they would. After suffering through an accident, that was not my fault, and going through rehab every single day for a month and half and still suffer to this day. In my opinion, that "care" was short lived very quickly. The lawyer I was assigned drug my case out for 1 1/2 years and went through 4 paralegals causes so much miscommunications and multiple request for the same information requested. That lawyer wasn't even there long either. When I called back 8 months later, he had already left. After all was said and done (1 year later and I did not have the energy to deal with them any longer), I sat and wrote the following e-mail to just explain my feelings of my entire experience... Dear Mr. Thurmond, My name is Keith. I was previously a client with your firm under xxxx. It has been a year since settling my case and I decided to wait until the dust settled and I had a clearer and less angry perception while under Xxxx's care. I am not writing you today to request anything from your firm but to say that I was so totally unsatisfied with the representation I received. Not only did I have to deal with 4 paralegal changes under Xxxx during my tenure under his "care", but given wrong information from one (that I believe caused her to be released) and affected my case, but repeatedly asked for identical documentation on numerous occasions. My frustration at times with xxxx (and I am a very patient man) caused me to contact you personally, via e-mail concerning them. After facing my physical issues for 1 1/2 years, the opposing attorney made an offer to me that would pay all my bills. In the end, I accepted the offer, paid my bills, paid your firm and walked away with such a small amount of funds that is to help me with my future medical needs. To this day I suffer greatly. I realize that you and your firm is in the business of making money and possibly my situation wasn't what would bring in big dollars. I still expected more when my case was accepted with, in my mind, proper and diligent representation. I write you today to simply tell you that because I was not offered the care I not only needed, but required and the representation I received was one of the worst I think I have ever heard of in my life from anyone, I will not be using or recommending your firm to anyone in the future. I will in fact share my experience with them and tell them to continue their search. I then received this the same day... I am in receipt of your email. Obviously, I am not pleased to relieve such an email. While XXXX is no longer with our firm, I intend to understand better the facts of your case and why you feel the way you do. I intend to get back to you no later than a week from this email. Thank you for letting me know your concerns. Paul On March 28th I received the following.. I am still gathering information. It will be another week or two before I respond. Sorry for the delay. Paul To this day, they have not followed up anymore, nor responded to one final e-mail I sent. As I said before...keep looking folks. Seriously, I would never trust or use this firm again.

Great, nice people in this office who manages , so it shows all the great oweners must be operating…read moreStephanie Smith, Mrs. Michelle McManigal, Esquire Tom Nelson, Esquire Stephen Futeral and their families Good work and pretty prompt, good people... if Michelle is busy, Stephanie does not leave any stone unturned- highly caring, knowledgeable.. Michelle is super good, nice and caring as well. i wanted to personally appreciate everyone in the office- thanks again Appreciated for all the good work you all do....Hope God helps me in the near future- Strong prayers Thanks again sri too many things at the same time-sorry to be honest, ethical now i am too old now it is hard to change- speak my mind or straightforward....oldest asian Indian thickest accent man

For the amount of money charged Thomas Nelson could have made made me feel like he had my back…read more Seems like he did the bare minimum to get me through my case. Nothing above and beyond at all. They made be a good attorney for other areas of law but did not think he did a good job for a criminal case. The communication was slow at times and did not do a very good job explaining in depth. I suggest searching for another attorney.

Exceptional service and professionalism from beginning to end. The entire team is knowledgeable,…read morecompassionate, and always one step ahead. Communication is clear, every detail is explained, and they handle each case with integrity and confidence. Truly one of the best law firms I've encountered.

I went with the bill green law firm a while back and they were very nice and helpful. They made my…read morestressful situation less than.

The service from this law firm is excruciatingly painful. More than the accident injuries. It's…read morebeen over 14 months and first we were NEVER notified that our lawyer moved on and we have a different lawyer in the middle of our case. The first assistant ( who also has changed hands since the start of the case,too) was rude and very abrupt and is all that talks to you at this firm. Unless you keep in touch with them you never hear from them ever. They are always waiting on something. They are not client friendly at all!! Don't believe his commercial or advertising. I don't recommend them at all!!

Truly a company with a heart. My aide goes above and beyond to make sure I am well taken care of.read more

I have known Michael Wood for many years and I can say that without a doubt he is the most moral…read moreand compassionate man I know. He will do anything to fight for his clients and he has done excellent work with abuse cases. You want this man on your side.

This individual is with out a doubt the worst attorney for divorce proceedings. Not only did he…read moremishandle my case, but his paperwork and filings are a mess. I have had to go back to court just to clean up the mess he created. He is sloppy and arrogant. Now you could say that this is me being upset over the outcome and some of that would be true. However these opinions have also been stated by no less then four other attorneys from three separate law firms. To further my point regarding Michael's work product I am posting a copy of Michaels public reprimand. This is for 2008, however he committed the same act while representing me. He also tried to get me to testify for him while he knew that he was committing the same type of act that got him the public reprimand which he failed to mention. This man is despicable. There are to many attorneys to use a bad one. I would use a negative star if I could. In the Matter of Michael David Wood Annotate this Case THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court In the Matter of Michael David Wood, Respondent. Opinion No. 26513 Submitted June 3, 2008 - Filed June 30, 2008 PUBLIC REPRIMAND Lesley M. Coggiola, Disciplinary Counsel, and C. Tex Davis, Jr., Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, both of Columbia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Michael David Wood, of Charleston, pro se. PER CURIAM: In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent (Agreement) pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the Agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to a confidential admonition or a public reprimand. We accept the Agreement and issue a public reprimand. The facts, as set forth in the Agreement, are as follows. Facts Respondent represented a client in a domestic matter. The client, who was living in the marital home, gave respondent an unopened package addressed to the client's spouse that had been delivered to the marital home. Respondent, without the knowledge or consent of the addressee, opened the package and removed its contents. Immediately thereafter, respondent informed opposing counsel, who was present for an emergency hearing in the case, of his actions and allowed him to inspect the contents of the package. During the emergency hearing, respondent informed the court that he had opened the package and he presented the contents of the package to the court. Law Respondent admits that, by his misconduct, he has violated the following provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR: Rule 4.4 (a lawyer who receives a document relating to the representation of the lawyer's client and knows or reasonably should know that the document was inadvertently sent shall promptly notify the sender) and Rule 8.4 (it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, to engage in conduct involving dishonesty or to engage in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice). Respondent further admits his misconduct constitutes grounds for discipline under Rule 7(a)(1)(it shall be a ground for discipline for a lawyer to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct) and Rule 7(a)(5)(it shall be a ground for discipline for a lawyer to engage in conduct tending to pollute the administration of justice or to bring the courts or the legal profession into disrepute or conduct demonstrating an unfitness to practice law) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR. Conclusion We find respondent's misconduct warrants a public reprimand. Accordingly, we accept the Agreement and publicly reprimand respondent for his misconduct. PUBLIC REPRIMAND. TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, PLEICONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Chad needed a letter notarized, so I found this guy online. Mr. Thomas P. Doughty has been a public…read morenotary since 1969 (and he was a lawyer since 1968!). He's located in a little old white trailer on Cosgrove just off of Spruill, but don't let the neighborhood or appearance deter you. Mr. Doughty is the nicest, most pleasant individual I have ever dealt with and he is very efficient in what he does. For $5, he will notarize any document you may need, same as any other notary public, but with him, you feel as though you are in good hands and won't ever feel rushed. I'm planning to use Mr. Doughty's notary public services for every notarization we need from now on! Please go see him and be sure to tell others who may need a notary public as well!

Tom was very friendly. He notarized my document very quickly and professionally. He showed me all…read morehis credentials. His price was 5 dollars. Cash only. Would definitely use him again and suggest him. Thanks Tom!

Exceeded all expectations! Responsive, efficient and reasonable. You can't go wrong with these…read moreguys.

This firm cares only about their fees and not about their clients. One of the partners that I have…read moredealt with was rude and condescending. As a female emerging from a diovrce with little financial knowledge, I felt my questions were stupid. I would not recommend this firm.