This law firm is incompent. The ability to clarify. They only retain clients that are seeking…read morelarge amounts. Lawyer's use to be all about justice. I was told that the efforts were not worth their time to try my case.

From the owner: Columbus, Ohio law firm with over 40 years of legal experience. Our attorneys have handled over…read more30,000 personal injury cases and helped clients receive more than $150,000,000. We focus on a wide variety of legal practice areas including: personal injury, auto accidents, nursing home abuse, medical malpractice, wrongful death, legal malpractice, dog bites, divorce and family law, oil and gas leases, probate litigation and much more.

Very disappointed in the service i had. They never returned several calls i made and didn't bother…read moreto send my chiropractic office i wanted to see a letter of protection. Then I was doing all the leg work pertaining to the video of the accident as well as dealing with the insurance company and their inappropriate behavior towards me. I'd highly recommend anyone find other council.

I needed someone who took on small cases and made them just as important as big ones and Schiff &…read moreAssociates did just that for my boys who was involved in an accident. They kept me involved every step of the process. Thanks for the care and the polite staff! You win when you choose their team to take on your case.

I used them for a motorcycle accident I was involved in about two years ago dealing with them was…read moreone of the worst experiences of my life. The communication was poor. it was rare for me to get a phone call from them without constantly leaving voicemails and emails for them to get back to me. not only that, but in my settlement, they forgot to pay out to the ambulance company that took me to the hospital the night of my accident and then told me that there was nothing they could do about it because I had already signed off on the settlement. so instead of taking responsibility for their mistake, they stuck me with $1000 ambulance bill. I wouldn't recommend using them to my worst enemy.

Los abogados de Malek & Malek son muy eficientes en su trabajo. Conocen muy bien las leyes de…read moretrabajo y los derechos del trabajador. Me ayudaron con mi demanda de accidente en el trabajo y consiguieron que me dieran terapia una pequeña compensación. Lo más importante es que me atendieron en mi idioma y explicaban todo durante el proceso

Kia and her Staff are Amazing! Don't second guess or call others & waste time. She has your…read moresituation handled timely.

If you are seeking an attorney that cares, will listen, and helps unravel a very complicated legal…read moreprocess, you want Attorney Kia M. Wrice to represent you. She is trustworthy, and is aiding our family try to find the best possible solutions. I am honored to work with her and will refer family and friends that may have legal needs. She values you as a person not another number, she will give you the attention you need and deserve. She is a blessing to me and to my family!

Melissa and staff are wonderful. I heard there was leadership changes and whatever change happened…read moreis working. They helped me and cared about me. I felt like family.

I wish these reviews would have been available back in Sept of 2010…read more I was hit by a construction trailer on an overpass on my way to work at 7:30am. The asshole who owned the trailer, did not have a safety latch or safety chains on the trailer hitch. He just had it sitting on the ball on the truck, and when it hit an expansion joint in the overpass, the trailer popped off the truck and hit me broadside, spun me around and if I hadn't jerked the wheel, I probably would have gone over the overpass. I ended up facing the opposite direction I was headed. There was not a piece of metal on my car that wasn't damaged. Both drivers side windows and the rear windows were all blown out. The owner of the trailer, which had sheet metal on it, didn't even check on me until he had his employees find and reload the trailer (all of the metal went over the embankment) before the law enforcement arrived on scene (So he wouldn't get cited for unsecured load). He did lie to them and told them he had safety chains, but they went over the embankment, and he couldn't find them. Praise the Lord, I was not visibly injured. I stupidly refused EMS treatment at the time. I was a county employee, and former nurse, so unless I was unconscious or bleeding to death, I didn't go. It was foggy that morning and I heard sirens going down the freeway (I figured someone may need a squad more than me)! A HUGE MISTAKE! It was used against me during my deposition. My 'attorney' dicked around for over a year. I had even complained about him to the receptionist at one point. He kept giving me the runaround, saying his insurance company was stalling. I at one point asked how much insurance he had, and my 'attorney' said it didn't matter because I wasn't going to get paid very much anyway. Over a year and a half later I had my deposition. I thought my 'attorney' was supposed to be on my side. The insurance companys attorneys, grilled me like I was the guilty party. They asked me if I had had weight problems over the past years, which I thought had nothing to do this my case. They grilled me about my past surgeries, and told me that the injury part of my case was being thrown out due to a pre-existing surgery. Though the accident had exacerbated that surgery and then some, including lumbar issues. My 'attorney' never spoke up in my defense not one time. Months later, after trying to contact my 'attorney' to see where everything was, I was still unable to talk to him. He wouldn't return my calls. I even had information that the trailer owner had had this happen before. I then tried talking to other attorneys who informed me that it had been almost 2 years since my accident, and that the statute of limitations for my case was 2 years, and that they wouldn't have enough time to learn the case, and try it in the time remaining. At two years at the eleventh hour, guess who calls me? Yep, he finally calls me to tell me that I had no case, that their insurance would cover my bills, which luckily after my health insurance, was under $5,000, and after their 1/3, I would get around $6,000. He told me we could go to trial, but it would cost me $7,000 to go to court, and I would have to pay for the jury selection, and he told me if I did go to court, that I would lose. Then I would get no money at all and probably still owe the courts. He had me over a barrel and he knew it. It is my opinion (which I am allowed) that Kurgis Law Firm is in the pockets of the insurance companies. They knew I had a high dollar claim, and paid Kurgis to keep me out of court. Kurgis Law Firm screwed me over big time. To this day, I rue the day I chose them to represent me. DO NOT LET THEM REPRESENT YOU. DO NOT GO FOR THE AMBULANCE CHACERS! Do your research! Don't fall for his spiel 'I don't get paid, if you don't get paid'! It's bullshit!

Rating = 0/0 I had…read morethe most unprofessional experience with the Workmens Compensation lawyer Kurt Knisley. He violated several parts of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct by threatening to put a lien on my claim, not once, but twice, for simply asking questions and expressing concerns. He violated the following core rules: Rule 1.2 (Scope of representation; allocation of authority) The client decides the objectives of representation, including whether to settle; the lawyer must consult with the client about means and keep the client reasonably informed. Rule 1.4 (Communication)Requires the lawyer to keep the client reasonably informed and to explain matters so the client can make informed decisions. Violation: Kurt Knisley did not inform me nor provide the details of the settlement demand until after the document was sent to the Respondent. He provided no option for the demand letter to be tailored according to my needs. Kurt threatened to withdraw as counsel and to place a lien on my claim in response to me asking him why this was done. Kurt Knisley decided to try to intimidate, instead of communicating and consulting. Rule 1.5 (Fees)Fees and expenses must be reasonable, and any lien for fees must be based on a valid fee agreement and applicable law. Violation: Kurt Knisley used the lien primarily as leverage to silence my concerns. This is inconsistent with the requirement that fee practices be fair and reasonable. Rule 1.16 (Declining or terminating representation)Lists when a lawyer may withdraw but requires withdrawal to be done in a way that protects the client's interests. Violation: Kurt Knisley used the threat of withdrawal and lien in a way that materially harmed my case simply because I challenged his strategy and asked questions. Rule 8.4 (Misconduct)Prohibits conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, and conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. Violation:The lien threat was knowingly misleading about Kurt Knisley's actual intention and was mainly used to coerce me into silence or agreement. I would not recommend Kurt for any Workmens Compensation case on these grounds. Kurts threats were retaliatory and coercive. A lawyer should not try to punish a client simply for disagreeing or asking questions. After all, it is a lawyers responsibility to keep clients informed, and represent their lawful objectives diligently.

Excellent work. Timely, precise and thorough. Will use them again if needed. Very prompt in…read moreresponding to our call.

Retained the services of Donahey in regards to a private matter affecting my son. Was represented…read moreby Matthew Wolf who was extremely professional yet easy to speak with and very down-to-earth. Matthew was efficient, courteous and timely. I would highly recommend Matthew and Donahey for legal matters within their areas of expertis .

Very rude phone manner. Not competitive to similar injury lawyers in the area as to what services…read morethey could even provide. Was not willing to do a phone call or free consultation. Don't waste your time calling this one.