Larrimer & Larrimer were able to push for all my medical needs to be met for well over a decade due…read moreto a work place injury. They were always available to answer any concerns that I've had over the years. I have recommended Larrimer and Larrimer to my family and friends.

I had Larrimer&Larrimer represent me several times. I was very satisfied every time. Attorney…read moreAaron Bocco handled all matters in a calm and very professional manner . I have no doubt that having Arron as my counsel led to end result I desired . I would highly recommend this law firm. Sincerely , Robert G.

Rating = 0/0 I had…read morethe most unprofessional experience with the Workmens Compensation lawyer Kurt Knisley. He violated several parts of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct by threatening to put a lien on my claim, not once, but twice, for simply asking questions and expressing concerns. He violated the following core rules: Rule 1.2 (Scope of representation; allocation of authority) The client decides the objectives of representation, including whether to settle; the lawyer must consult with the client about means and keep the client reasonably informed. Rule 1.4 (Communication)Requires the lawyer to keep the client reasonably informed and to explain matters so the client can make informed decisions. Violation: Kurt Knisley did not inform me nor provide the details of the settlement demand until after the document was sent to the Respondent. He provided no option for the demand letter to be tailored according to my needs. Kurt threatened to withdraw as counsel and to place a lien on my claim in response to me asking him why this was done. Kurt Knisley decided to try to intimidate, instead of communicating and consulting. Rule 1.5 (Fees)Fees and expenses must be reasonable, and any lien for fees must be based on a valid fee agreement and applicable law. Violation: Kurt Knisley used the lien primarily as leverage to silence my concerns. This is inconsistent with the requirement that fee practices be fair and reasonable. Rule 1.16 (Declining or terminating representation)Lists when a lawyer may withdraw but requires withdrawal to be done in a way that protects the client's interests. Violation: Kurt Knisley used the threat of withdrawal and lien in a way that materially harmed my case simply because I challenged his strategy and asked questions. Rule 8.4 (Misconduct)Prohibits conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, and conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. Violation:The lien threat was knowingly misleading about Kurt Knisley's actual intention and was mainly used to coerce me into silence or agreement. I would not recommend Kurt for any Workmens Compensation case on these grounds. Kurts threats were retaliatory and coercive. A lawyer should not try to punish a client simply for disagreeing or asking questions. After all, it is a lawyers responsibility to keep clients informed, and represent their lawful objectives diligently.

Excellent work. Timely, precise and thorough. Will use them again if needed. Very prompt in…read moreresponding to our call.

One of the best lawyer, I'll recommended for all my friends without exception…read more Thank you so much Mr Sanjay for for help and good communication and understanding the situation

I can only say great things about Sanjay. He stepped in for my attorney and made me feel that he…read morewas going to go to battle for me. He didn't stop at just the court date he kept fighting for me after. I highly recommend him to everyone!

Best Company ever, they do not play any games. They get the job done the first time and on time.read more

great guys. everybody was nice and funny and understanding. A lot of respect and professionalism…read more I would recommend to anybody.

After a work-related injury as a Semi truck driver I needed the help of an attorney to represent me…read moreregarding Ohio workers comp case. @ Malek law firm I received personal and caring treatment and amazing positive results. Doug Malek worked very close with me on my case and kept me in the loop @ every step of the way. Always available to answer questions. I couldn't be more happy with the decision I made regarding who would represent me as my attorney. I'd recommend Malek Law Firm to any and everyone who needs help with workers comp cases. R Wood

I used them for a motorcycle accident I was involved in about two years ago dealing with them was…read moreone of the worst experiences of my life. The communication was poor. it was rare for me to get a phone call from them without constantly leaving voicemails and emails for them to get back to me. not only that, but in my settlement, they forgot to pay out to the ambulance company that took me to the hospital the night of my accident and then told me that there was nothing they could do about it because I had already signed off on the settlement. so instead of taking responsibility for their mistake, they stuck me with $1000 ambulance bill. I wouldn't recommend using them to my worst enemy.

Matt Ice helped me all the way though my insurance claim and settlement. He was extremely helpful…read moreand was able to achieve a large settlement, more than I ever thought. I would strongly recommend him.

I regret hiring Corey Lauer and GB Law to represent me. In my opinion, this office operates more…read morelike a high-volume settlement firm than trial counsel prepared to go the distance. Throughout my case, I felt they were far more interested in a "fast and easy" settlement than in doing the actual work required for a case involving lasting physical and psychological harm. Key issues from my experience: Lack of Proactive Strategy: Vital steps, such as obtaining a psychological evaluation, only happened because I was strongly advised to do so by a different law firm (Malek & Malek). From my perspective, Corey Lauer's office did not appear to consider it necessary, which I found deeply concerning. Minimizing Valid Claims: When I raised the importance of a workers' compensation aspect of my incident, an attorney from this office declined to assist and minimized its value. Another firm saw the importance immediately, and the final records show that a Bureau of Workers' Compensation (BWC) lien was indeed part of this case. Risk-Averse Advocacy: I felt consistently pressured to accept a low offer. The communications I received focused almost entirely on the "risks" of trial rather than the merits of my claim. To my knowledge, there wasn't even an effort to escalate my claim to the insurance adjuster's supervisor. The Final Result: I ultimately felt forced to settle for a low-ball offer--not because the offer was fair, but because the firm's lack of preparation left me with no confidence that they would properly represent my interests at trial. Because I had to do the heavy lifting that they neglected, I requested they lower their contingency fee from 25% to 20%. Corey Lauer refused, stating the partners would not agree to any further reductions. I essentially paid a significant amount in attorney fees for a result I could have achieved, or likely improved upon on my own. They took a large cut for simply processing paperwork, while I was the one identifying the medical and legal gaps they ignored or failed to address. Be aware: In my experience, you may get weak results here. I do not believe it is worth your time or money. There were many concerning issues, and I felt taken advantage of.

I was recommended to Smitherman law by a co-worker of mine. Within 10 minutes of talking to Kellee…read moreI knew I was in good hands. I felt comfortable and she reassured me that her and Erika would do everything they could to help me. They both are very knowledgeable and understanding of what I am going through and compassionate when I tell them my fears and worries.

I would highly recommend this law firm her team has been diligent on working with my divorce. They…read moreare very thorough and don't miss anything.

Atkins and Atkins has always been forthcoming, patient and helpful with any legal questions that I…read morehave asked. I appreciate their honesty and ability to handle delicate situations with professionalism and compassion.

Jesse is the best lawyer I have ever had the pleasure of working with. Very friendly and…read moreknowledgeable.