I had Jennifer Cochran represent me many years ago for a custody issue. This was a very tough case…read moreand Ms. Cochran was my third lawyer. The first lawyer didn't do much preparation and then lost the first part of my custody issue and went on maternity leave, so she couldn't continue to represent me. She recommended a different lawyer and I used him, but he had a large bias that greatly hindered my case. I found Ms. Cochran as a referral through one of my clients and it was such a blessing that I found her. Ms. Cochran argued the true legal aspect of the case and forced the judge to look at the LAW in order to make a ruling. It forced him to overturn his original judgment and allowed me to win the case. I don't know what I would have done without her and will forever be greatful for her knowledge and excellent representation.

Ms Cochran did file all of our documents on time & never misses important hearings; Is always on…read moretime, especially if it's to an important meeting or a court hearing. She bills credibly and does not overcharge billable time. That's where the good news ends. Now for what did not work; a) Doesn't Know What's Going on in Your Case: Your attorney should know your case status at any given time. It's okay if your attorney needs to check the docket or case notes to verify certain items. However, Jennifer was not able to tell us what's happening in our divorce when asked. It was always 'I'll check with opposing attorney and get back to you'. b) Unfamiliar with Local Court Procedures: Each jurisdiction has its own specific rules that attorneys must follow. However, I found the hard way that she doesn't understand local laws or procedures, hence in our case ended up taking much longer than necessary, & even worse, being dismissed because Ms. Cochran failed to meet essential requirements. c) Too Timid: Great attorneys come with many different styles and personalities. However, Ms. Cochran was too afraid to defend me or advocate on our behalf. She was clearly not comfortable in the courtroom and addressing the judge. d) biased perspective: Ms. Cochran has a female centric perspective. We only found about the bias later, much later. She may be a good adoption attorney, certainly not a family law attorney in high conflict divorce. We learnt our lesson.

We needed a partial survey done on property we own in Wimberley. Everyone else we called said it…read morewould be 6 to 8 weeks and wanted anywhere from three to $4000 to complete the job. Weaver completed the job for us in less than three weeks and the charges were extremely reasonable compared to the competition. I Highly recommend them for responsiveness, pricing and timeliness.

Mike is extremely professional and knowledgeable. His service is prompt and he meets his deadlines…read morewhich to me is almost as important as an accurate survey.

Competent, easy-going but professional, efficient, never pushy. We've used him successfully for…read morewills and other senior/family law matters.

This is the go-to shop for the best customer service and prices. I contacted the shop on a Sunday…read morevia email, they weren't even open. They replied and took my order and fulfilled it within 48 hours. Super fast service, great communication, and great prices too! You cannot beat them!!

One of the most friendly businesses around. Exceeded all expectations! Projects were completed in…read morea timely fashion without sacrificing quality. Rick was very helpful and did very well on keeping correspondence through emails. Will definitely go back for more business in the future.

Competent, aggressive, tenacious, and client focused. Trek / Karl and team were willing to help my…read moregroup work through a very ugly situation and bring it to a proper resolution. No stone was left unturned via civil and criminal proceedings to make sure that our group was made whole. You may be able to find a "bigger" firm....but you will not find a better one. Strongest possible recommendation.

If you are looking for a talented, passionate, driven and professional law firm look no further…read more Doyle & Seelbach helped our charity tremendously in a very difficult case, where we had little hope and even fewer resources. Their drive and professionalism was only matched by their resiliency and commitment. I cannot recommend them enough.

Cowart Law has handled a child custody/protective order for us. Both Tim Cowart and Kimberly Ashby…read morehave provided us with expert legal advice on our case and always responded quickly to our questions. Unfortunately with child custody issues they don't always happen during normal 9-5 hours. Both attorneys would respond after hours and on weekends as needed. They provide their clients with expert legal advice on family law and do not leave you wondering what to do or what is taking place with your case. The best firm to use if you need family law counsel.

Thank you though firm was able to help with my small business needs. I trusted their counsel…read moreregarding a property dispute, they were very thorough, and I was able to achieve the outcome I had anticipated. The cost was in my opinion competitive with other similar practices in the area.

I hired the Thomas Law Firm to review a few business contracts for an upcoming event. The work was…read moredone quickly and professionally. After this good experience, I decided to use them again in a tenant-landlord dispute and the issue was resolved efficiently and with great communication. Will definitely use again in the future if any additional needs arise. Their office is located in the Bee Cave Galleria.

DO NOT TRUST THIS ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT YOU…read more I hired Griffith "Hunter" Thomas II in 2021, trusting him as the managing attorney and namesake of Thomas Law Firm. I paid a $5,000 retainer in good faith and was left with a stalled case, procedural failures, and no resolution after more than three years. I am now in the process of filing formal complaints with both the State Bar of Texas and the Better Business Bureau. 1. Repeated Failure to Serve Opposing Counsel. Despite multiple assurances that key motions had been filed -- including one to dismiss the case and another to recover my $6,200 bond -- they were never served on the opposing party, rendering them procedurally useless. "Our firm was not served with the motion to request the return of cash deposit nor with appellant's motion to withdraw appeal... The motions were not 'unopposed' but were simply unreceived by us." -- Opposing counsel, April 2025 This wasn't an isolated mistake. I have similar evidence from 2022 confirming the same issue. This shows a pattern of negligence, not just a one-time oversight. 2. Contradictory Claims About Firm Identity and Evasion of Responsibility. In 2025, Mr. Thomas attempted to distance himself from responsibility by claiming that a "previous firm" had represented me -- despite the fact that the firm still operates under his name, from the same location, using the same phone number and email address that have been active since 2021. He wrote: "As you both should know, my previous firm represented you in the subject-titled cause. I was listed as an attorney on the case, though I should not have been. I did provide minimal advice to your lead attorney on a certain question, and I was the managing attorney of that firm at the time. Since then, our new firm wanted to help finalize the case, however, and though I would like to help y'all, I must withdraw due to a conflict of interest." -- Griffith "Hunter" Thomas II, 2025 No formal substitution of counsel or withdrawal was ever filed. The attempt to rebrand or relabel the same legal entity appears to be a blatant misrepresentation, designed to sidestep professional responsibility without changing any actual operations. 3. $5,000 Retainer Depleted Without Results. Despite repeated commitments to advance the case, no hearing was set and no motion was ever ruled on. Instead, my entire retainer was depleted -- not on progress, but on: * Internal file reviews by junior attorneys * Repeated responses to my update requests * Reworking tasks that should've been completed long ago At no point did my case move meaningfully forward. Their inaction left me right where I started -- only with thousands of dollars gone. 4. Poor Supervision of Inexperienced Staff. My case was eventually handed off to a first-year associate who had recently joined the firm. He appeared at a key hearing (a Temporary Restraining Order) and said nothing. He was left to manage filings and deadlines with little to no oversight -- resulting in additional errors and delays that undermined my position. I was ultimately forced to represent myself. After years of missed deadlines, broken promises, and misleading communication, I was told I would need to pay even more to continue -- despite the fact that my original $5,000 retainer should have been more than sufficient for this matter. At that point, I had no choice but to represent myself. Mr. Thomas's actions violated my trust and appear to violate multiple provisions of the Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Avoid this attorney. Don't be fooled by polished branding, vague excuses, or shifting stories. What I experienced was negligence, misrepresentation, and costly deflection -- while my case stalled and my retainer disappeared.