Robert was quick to call me back and explain the pros and cons of a potential product liability…read morecase that I was enquiring about. He even took the time to do a little research over the phone with me and get me headed in the right direction. He's very personable and I would highly recommend him as an auto accident/injury lawyer.

So far so good! The reviews have been on point with Robert Barry. We were in Scottsdale on vacation…read morewent the car accident occurred and needed an attorney from Arizona. I looked it up through Yelp and discovered Mr. Barry. We have not been disappointed. Things are just beginning but so far the service has been awesome!

I call about my potential case and was given the courtesy of a phone call by Mr. Kelly regarding…read morethe potential strengths and weaknesses of my case. Whether or not Mr Kelly takes on my case I truly appreciate that he took the time to have a honest conversation about it.

Last year, after I got hit by a drunk driver a friend, referred me to the Kelly Law Team! To tell…read moreyou the truth, it was hands-down, one of the best recommendations I have ever received. let's start off with the communication. when I first called, I believe the receptionist took my information and she let me know that Mr. Kelly would be reviewing my information and would give me a call.... And he did. He let me know at the end of our conversation that my point of contact would be a gentleman/paralegal named Trent and if I ever had any questions or concerns that I could reach out to him. Within days Trent reached out to me and started to get the process rolling on all of my medical needs. Through months of counseling and medical treatment Trent was always calling me to check on how I was doing and genuinely cared about my well-being, to me it was so much more than just business, and that meant the world to me, Mr. Kelly, you have a rockstar in Trent!! My ending result was one that I was very happy with and I will send any loved one that needs a firm who is passionate, understanding and truly cares, to the Kelly Law Team. Thank you guys!!

These people are all bloodsucking parasites. They purposefully avoid you in order to rack up legal…read morefees. My HOA (also some dirty crooks) took me off autopay without my knowledge and racked up a bunch of penalties. This group of leeches is representing my HOA and has tacked on a buttload of bogus fees which far exceed the amount of penalty fees we acquired while we were unknowingly not being charged by the HOA on autopay. I truly hope every single worthless scumbag in this office gets a severe butt itch for several days in a row.

I had a past due amount with my HOA and they hired this firm. I received a notice from them with…read moretotal amount due including $450 attorneys fee. I paid the total amount in full on March 6 via bank draft. My HOA has my account locked because this firm has yet to inform them of my payment. I can't access my account or use amenities that require my keyfab. I have called multiple times and never receive a response. Something about this seems illegal or at least unethical. Where's my money? My next steps will be AZ Bar Association, BBB and possibly State Attorney.

I can't thank this team enough for everything they did for me. I was in a terrible accident & had…read moreno clue what my next steps were. They helped me settle my case and were there for me every step of the way. They always kept me updated, answered all of my questions, and made me feel supported throughout the entire process. I truly appreciated their kindness, honesty, and dedication. I highly recommend them to anyone looking for a team that genuinely cares about their clients.

My husband and I were in a car accident on July 31, 2026 and I really wanted to go with this law…read morefirm because I really liked the way they portrayed their firm on their advertisements on tv but looks can be deceiving. As their ad states "Do your research." I spent 30 minutes speaking with the intake representative about the accident. She then connected us with an attorney. He informed us that I had a strong case with liability, but my husband didn't, despite being the driver and sustaining a more severe injury. The attorney also mentioned that there wasn't much of a case because no one sought medical attention, there was no blood, and no broken bones were reported. It's sad to think that these are the criteria used to decide whether a case will be taken or not. The attorney said it seems like a road rage incident because my husband honked his horn at the other driver, and we rear-ended him because he braked suddenly. At no time was this a road rage incident. My husband used the horn solely as a warning to alert the other driver that we were already traveling in that lane after the driver unexpectedly entered our path. The horn was intended as a defensive measure to help prevent a collision, not as an act of aggression. My husband wasn't even cited for anything! It appeared to me that the attorney failed to comprehend the details of the accident we were explaining. It sounded like the attorney advised against using your horn and simply letting someone hit you. This didn't make sense to me, so we decided to seek advice from another well-known firm that disagreed with this approach. Furthermore, the attorney was displeased that my husband was arguing with him and persistently insisted to the attorney that it wasn't a road rage incident. However, the attorney refused to listen and it was frustrating my husband. The attorney claimed that he wouldn't tolerate someone screaming at him, but my husband was in another room and was speaking loudly, which was definitely not screaming at this attorney. I was deeply disappointed that this attorney refused to gather all the facts and genuinely listen to a potential client. This experience with this law firm taught me a lesson "listen to your gut and stick to your truth."

I consulted with Mike Munoz. My greatest fear was that I had to speak with police. Mike Munoz…read moremade it very clear that that was not the situation. In fact, the opposite is true, that I did not have to speak with police. Mike explained my rights. In my emotional state, I needed the clear details that he gave me about how to protect rights and invoke my right to remain silent if questioned by the police. Mike explained and simplified the details. With one phone call, he alleviated the fears I was experiencing. Mike is an honest attorney. He gave me a clear evaluation of the situation. If I need his services, which he told me I did not need at the time (an honest attorney!), I will call Mike Munoz. I trust him to protect my life. Thank you, Mike! You do not know how much your comments mean to me! The best attorney ever with lucid explanations!

I am unaware of the services since I still have yet to receive any…read more Yesterday morning I reached out to get a phone consultation with him & was told I'd get him at 4p. By 4:20 I'd yet to hear anything so I called & was told he was running behind on his previous phone call & was understanding. 4:45 hit & I was not nearly as understanding bc my thoughts are "I'm gonna let someone have my back in court that won't have my back for a phone consultation??" I then called again & was told (by the person that answers the phone) that she texted him to remind him of the 4:30 appointment. 4:30?!?!? I was told 4. She then told me he's still on the phone & I expressed to her that I was very irritated because I waited around my phone for something that was scheduled. Hello! I schedule calls & appointments too, the difference is I show up to mine. I decided that I did not want to hire someone that is unorganized with their call system because who knows where all of my court docs will go - could be scattered in several folders. To end the story I was never called at all yesterday & when I called today he was in court & I was told that it's "busy season". I was then told today (the day after not having my appointment followed through with) that I was being rude with expressing how frustrated I was. I wasn't rude, I wasn't vulgar - I was honest. Munoz defended himself saying was a "nice guy" & per reviews I see that, but I was not treated well by him. No apology for missing my consultation & no apology when I cracked a joke saying "you're the most difficult guy to get in contact with" rather he had a condescending attitude stating "yeah, we're a really busy attorneys office". Seems rather prideful to me with no apology whatsoever. Set people up with expectations because we also have a life outside of yours.

Confident, Competent and sharp. These are the words I use for this firm and my lawyer…read more In what some people might consider a low level case but could have cost me my 20 year high-level financial services career, Jacob Wilson with this firm (as well as the supporting staff) immediately started steering the boat and not only performed a perfect information investigation with me and with the state but also the mounting of a robust and thoughtful defense to ensure my ending was what it was... which is charges and ridiculousness dismissed. This firm came with officer of the court recommendations from their peers and I am very pleased with how this case resolved. They earned every star. JT

I am not one to write reviews but my experience with Lopez Law inspired me. in 50 years of driving…read moreI had never had an alcohol related mark on my record. I recently received an open container ticket which I later found to be a criminal offense! not wanting that on my record I fronted Lopez $4,000 to reduce to a traffic ticket or go away. everything was great, until it wasn't. on the morning of my day in court "attorney Derek" shoves paperwork for me to plead guilty to the open container charge with a $750 fine- exactly. what I could have walked in myself and received. Zero effort on their part produced zero results for me. my efforts to contact to negotiate at least a partial refund have been ignored to this point. if at any point prior to the final moments before court they had informed me of my situation I would have had time to make clear decision, they did not. I strongly suggest anyone looking for legit legal counsel look. to someone else. Dennis Summers

I had to have a new trust and will written and I called 3 attorneys. One attorney scheduled me for…read morean intake appointment 6 weeks away, another took a message and Guidant Law got me in the followling week. I did all the paperwork they requested and 1.5 weeks later I was reviewing my documents. I will be signing my trust documents this week and moving on. In total it took 3.5 weeks from the first call to the document signing. Couldn't have asked for a better outcome.

Jim is great. He offers his advice on your ideas & other options to consider. He takes his time…read morewith you to serve you best! So far we've enjoyed his services for our company.

The care and service I received from the Accident Guys was exceptional. They set up all of my…read moremedical appointments immediately after the accident to help me begin the healing process. All medical people were well-reviewed online (I checked every time I was referred to a doctor). Overall, I highly recommend the Accident Guys if you're ever unfortunate enough to be the victim of an automobile accident.

I was rear ended recently and the insurance was giving me the run around I was so frustrated I…read morecalled the accident guys and they took care of everything they always responded to my questions fast! Thank you accident guys!

Stuart has been the most amazing family lawyer I could have imagined. I came to him broken because…read moreI had given everything to try and make things work for the sake of my kids. At the end of the day things failed and they were taken from me abruptly. Stuart knew exactly why to do, told me how we were gonna do it and we'll prepared me. When we stepped into the court room I was very nervous while at the same time awe struck watching him plead my case and bring to light the inaccuracies of the other party. When all was said and done I had my kids back and I had equal and fair time. Without him I'm not sure where I would be today and I owe him more than I could ever give. Thank you Stuart. I heavily recommend Stuart's services as he is incredibly intelligent about law and know exactly what needs to be done and how to do it. Since my initial divorce and custody trial, I have used Stuart for a few modifications and enforcements as well all with what I consider wins in the book. The last thing I will say is that Stuart doesn't look at the case as a win or lose but what's best for the kids and what's fair for the clients. He is not afraid to tell you if you are being unreasonable and what is a good or a bad decision. And HONESTY is a major deciding factor for me to continue using Stuart's services.

I expected representation. What I received was proximity without protection…read more I hired Stuart Peterson during a vulnerable stage of a family court case, expecting guidance, advocacy, and clear direction. Instead, I found myself navigating critical safety concerns largely on my own. When I asked for assistance with filing an Order of Protection, I was told that "wasn't what I hired him for." That moment revealed something I did not expect to discover in a lawyer: an unwavering belief in the limits of his role, even when a child's safety was central to the case. Throughout my engagement, important evidence I provided was not presented, court preparation was minimal, and communication about procedures was unclear. I repeatedly found myself unsure of what had been filed, what had been argued, or what to expect in hearings that determined my child's day-to-day reality. What made this even more disorienting was the tone of some of the commentary I received. Rather than focusing on legal strategy or documented concerns, discussions veered into personal territory -- including remarks about hormones and "rabbit holes" -- which felt dismissive during an already stressful time. Financially, I was billed for work that did not translate into courtroom action, clarity, or preparation. The imbalance between cost and tangible representation left me asking a question no parent should have to ask while paying for counsel: "Am I actually being represented?" I'm sharing this so other parents understand what I wish I had known: a lawyer can be physically present and yet functionally absent. Family court is not theoretical. It involves children, safety, and irreversible outcomes. Clients deserve a legal advocate who sees the gravity of that -- not someone who treats concerns as detours. I cannot recommend this firm based on my experience.

This is an honest, heartfelt review from the other side of the table. My divorce was just…read morefinalized this week. I chose not to get an attorney, my ex chose this firm. Because I didn't have an attorney, Mr. McGill could deal with me directly. Therefore, as not his client, I can tell you what the experience was like as the "other" party. I am paying the attorney's fees, so I feel as though I have a right to voice my opinion here. There is a reason I personally don't hire lawyers, this experience was the epitome of why. In my humble opinion, it is all about the "billable hours." Communication was always polite and mostly professional, however, I had to constantly push for information and answers. I asked the same questions on a regular basis from mid May to early July. I finally got the answers to those questions in Mid July. I completely understand that my ex had major decisions to make, however, they were pretty simple questions in my mind, based on what we both knew to be true. They may very well have been huge decisions on my ex's part, however, there were other things I was offering to do that more than made up for what I was asking about. Mr. McGill would ask me the same questions over and over again, when I had already answered them several times, this was annoying. What kind of lawyer doesn't document the responses in a way that he can refer back to them? Maybe it is a lawyer thing. Maybe it is just me, I am a record keeper and I document everything I can in black and white, as proof of what has been said and done. I understand that my ex wasn't his only client, however, wasn't there a file laying around somewhere with my answers noted? Didn't he have my original paperwork to refer to, where his questions were answered BEFORE he asked them? I understand wanting clarification, however, my responses were the same each and every time. It was all very repetitive, and quite frankly annoying. This is where my opinion on billable hours comes in. Our dozens of email exchanges probably padded his fees. At the end came the Consent Decree. The wrong dates and counties were noted on the draft submission. Seriously, you don't know what year it is or what county the proceedings are taking place in? More billable hours for revisions? I was eternally grateful that the final draft was sent to me last Tuesday, I got my signature notarized, emailed the page back to him that same day, and then there were crickets.....I finally asked on Monday when the papers would be filed with the court. He told me one of his "runners" was taking them to the courthouse on Tuesday morning. Thankfully the Judge's clerk emailed me confirmation that the Judge had signed the papers that same day while cancelling the scheduled resolution conference, otherwise I would have had to wait for confirmation for god only knows how long. With something this important, there is a ton of stress and lost sleep. Emotions are high and lives are literally on hold. Communication solves a lot of that. I don't know, maybe he was in constant communication with my ex. Keep in mind, Patrick McGill owes me nothing, I was not his client, but I am paying his bill. I felt as though he drug his feet through the entire process. My ex and I didn't disagree about anything from the beginning. It was really a very simple transaction, there was no arguing back and forth, neither of us were trying to stick it to each other. He and I have no ill will towards each other. My ex has been paid his half of the equity on our house, the two debts of his that I offered to, and promised to pay off have been paid off. The Consent Decree stated that those needed to be paid within 30 days of the Judge signing. Done, Done, and Done. The only debt left for me to pay off is Mr. McGill's bill, I am still waiting to actually get a physical copy of that. This didn't need to take 4 months to complete, it could have been done a long time ago, for a lot less money. Again, this is just my opinion. We all know the saying about opinions..... Thank you for reading, and take this for what it is, my personal opinion.

We had a problem with a contractor. A solution was negotiated and imposed. We were never out of the…read moreloop. Good advice and easy to deal with.