Terry Myer and Amelia Myer at Columbus Detective Agency turned one of the most stressful times in…read moreour lives into a nightmare. We were quoted $150 -- flat. No mention of additional charges. No contract. No terms. We paid immediately, trusting their word and assuming everything was covered. But once the job was done and they knew we couldn't go elsewhere without jeopardizing a sensitive legal case, they hit us with hundreds more in hidden fees, including $100 for a notary that typically costs $10-$15. We told them from the start that we were new to this process and needed help -- they knew that. And instead of guiding us, they took full advantage. If there were going to be more charges, they should've been disclosed up front -- not sprung on us after the fact when they were holding important court documents we needed to move forward. This didn't feel like professional service. It felt like a complete scam -- and no one should have to go through what we did just to get basic legal paperwork handled. If you're in a vulnerable legal situation, stay far away from this agency. You deserve honesty and transparency -- not deception, manipulation, and hidden fees.

I recently hired the Columbus Detective Agency (CDA), led by Detective Terry Myer and associates,…read morefor an urgent, time-sensitive, complicated, and important job. I picked CDA because Detective Myer is a nationally-renown leader in his field and has many years of successful cases under his belt. As expected, in my case CDA brought to the task a wide range of strategies, tactics, and technologies in order to cover all aspects of the job and to make certain that nothing went wrong. For example, CDA had a solution for every possible exigency, which was clearly and carefully explained to me in advance. Since this was a very important case, I was willing to pay extra for all of the bells and whistles. However, everything was free of charge except for the basic service. Even though several readjustments had to be made during the job due to unforeseen circumstances, CDA made these readjustments without complaint and without charging me extra. Needless to say, the job was completed successfully on time and on the first attempt. Also, CDA kept in close contact with me during the entire operation, gave me frequent updates, and (as previously stated) was nimble enough to make split-second readjustments when things did not go as planned or expected. As a result, I will use CDA every time I need a detective agency, and anyone desiring the very best detective agency at a reasonable price should do so, too. -- Jonathan

Rating = 0/0 I had…read morethe most unprofessional experience with the Workmens Compensation lawyer Kurt Knisley. He violated several parts of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct by threatening to put a lien on my claim, not once, but twice, for simply asking questions and expressing concerns. He violated the following core rules: Rule 1.2 (Scope of representation; allocation of authority) The client decides the objectives of representation, including whether to settle; the lawyer must consult with the client about means and keep the client reasonably informed. Rule 1.4 (Communication)Requires the lawyer to keep the client reasonably informed and to explain matters so the client can make informed decisions. Violation: Kurt Knisley did not inform me nor provide the details of the settlement demand until after the document was sent to the Respondent. He provided no option for the demand letter to be tailored according to my needs. Kurt threatened to withdraw as counsel and to place a lien on my claim in response to me asking him why this was done. Kurt Knisley decided to try to intimidate, instead of communicating and consulting. Rule 1.5 (Fees)Fees and expenses must be reasonable, and any lien for fees must be based on a valid fee agreement and applicable law. Violation: Kurt Knisley used the lien primarily as leverage to silence my concerns. This is inconsistent with the requirement that fee practices be fair and reasonable. Rule 1.16 (Declining or terminating representation)Lists when a lawyer may withdraw but requires withdrawal to be done in a way that protects the client's interests. Violation: Kurt Knisley used the threat of withdrawal and lien in a way that materially harmed my case simply because I challenged his strategy and asked questions. Rule 8.4 (Misconduct)Prohibits conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, and conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. Violation:The lien threat was knowingly misleading about Kurt Knisley's actual intention and was mainly used to coerce me into silence or agreement. I would not recommend Kurt for any Workmens Compensation case on these grounds. Kurts threats were retaliatory and coercive. A lawyer should not try to punish a client simply for disagreeing or asking questions. After all, it is a lawyers responsibility to keep clients informed, and represent their lawful objectives diligently.

Excellent work. Timely, precise and thorough. Will use them again if needed. Very prompt in…read moreresponding to our call.

I have used this company 3 times now. They show up when they say they are going to and get the job…read moredone. Highly recommended.

Our company had issues with a large document shredding company so I reached out to RDD for a quote…read morethrough their website. Within 10 minutes I had a call back from a local rep, an email from Stephanie with a quote within 20, and within one week we had a new shredding company taking care of us. RDD showed up when they said they would and handled everything in a professional manner. John delivered our new bins and was super friendly. This local company also has a lower cost we were previously paying, with larger shred bins! Exceptional customer service without the run around, and shows up when expected. It's a win-win! The bins from the previous company are still waiting to be picked up, after multiple phone calls and transfers.

Awesome place to find a job! Was only a temp for a warehouse for 3 months until they hired me on…read morefull time. I did hate paying for my own background check and drug test but I guess it's worth it to make some money in Columbus.

I have been a client of Willis Spangler Starling since September 2020. Tyler, Maggie and Philip…read morehave been handling my case and each and everyone of them have been extremely professional, courteous and beyond effective dealing with all aspects of my claim(s). I couldn't imagine trying to correctly complete all the different types of bwc paperwork, scheduling and hearings on my own while dealing with my all appointments, testing and surgery from my injuries without the amazing support from the people at this law firm. If you have been injured on the job I'm telling you with all honesty you need to at least call and talk with someone from this firm. It has made an extremely stressful time in my life so much better by having Willis Spangler Starling in my corner. They have truly lifted a massive burden off of me.

Pretty bad someone has the evidence to show where the business is lying about what they were doing…read moreto their employee at the time. Your law firm must've been paid off by that private business, another employee still has their job, but not the other that suffered a worse back injury. Karma's a bitch. Your firm doesn't even deserve the one star.

Mark and his team are amazing. They have helped me and few others I have sent over the years clear…read moreup bankruptcy issues. Wonderful team would recommend and do recommend.

I knew Mark from his involvement with the Ohio State football saturdays at Ohio Stadium. I since…read morewhen on to compete professionally and am now a team scout and coordinator. I was in financial distress, and it is difficult to think clearly and make good decisions . That, in addition to not understanding a legal process complicates matters even more. When I first contacted him for bankruptcy, Mark explained the law, outlined in clear language the steps in the process that needed to be done. He was knowledgable as well. He filed my bankruptcy case and I was very pleased with the services that were provided by Mark and his office. I was just served on Christmas Eve with a summons for another matter and I did not seriously expect a return call from the office until Monday. Well, Mark called me back on Christmas Day. And he was on his way to his family gathering where he was going to play the piano for his relatives. I had previously used him for a bankruptcy situation and the case was flawless. He had thoroughly reviewed my debts and income and filed very quickly. Because of his excellent work in getting my case filed, my credit reports all revealed that all my bills were covered by my bankruptcy. When I received the notice of my recent lawsuit for another type of case, I knew that i could reach out to Mark to get straight, honest advice, because that is exactly what he had provided in the past. Again, he reached out to me on the holiday and within 10 minutes he guided me in the right direction. I was able to attend my family gatherings with confidence that the bogus lawsuit filed against me would be taken care of. I am still surprised that he called me when he is a very busy person, even in this pandemic that will not go away. But clearly Mark cares. I simply do not understand some of the other reviews about his abilities, when I clearly have had numerous good experiences with Mark and his law firm. Mark is a good person with excellent fundamentals in both his profession and his personal dealings. This is remarkable in todays world. He is also a busy piano player during the holiday seasons, but he still called me and shared his time with me. I am most impressed with this type of work ethic. Thank you again, and Merry Christmas to Mark!!