The bridge gets a 5 because the view from it is *not* ruined by an unsightly 85 foot mess-tangle of…read moreindustrial waste. In fact, the wreckage of that object is instead lying on the ground nearby. THAT is actually something to gaze joyfully upon.
I tried extraneously, even frantically, to convince Bridgeway Station management (Hughes Investments), the local government, and merchants located at Bridgeway that installing this piece would be damaging to the community. Management said that "art was in the eye of the beholder." Local merchants claimed my concern had nothing to do with their businesses. Of course, if people avoid Bridgeway because of an unsightly spectacle, that would have "something" to do with them.
The negative public response is predictable, based on the response to another sculpture by the same artist, placed in Ossining, NY in the 2010s. It is only half the size of the one that was planned for here. Ossining is 50 miles north of NYC, where bizarre & provocative art is as well-received as it is anywhere in the world. Ossining funds its own sculpture park; the people there are receptive to experimental art. But when this piece appeared in a riverfront-park area, local reaction was overwhelmingly negative. The reaction in Upstate SC to a piece different from that one only by being more than twice the size would most probably be worse.
Nonetheless, Hughes Investments went forward. The result was the sculpture broke while it was being installed. Oh joyous wonder--the local community will be spared the blight! But this reflects terribly on management, along with local governing authorities, who are effectively mutually responsible.
One must ask: Why didn't the installation of this piece receive the prominent preceding promotion that every other major event to take place at Bridgeway Station has? (They've been most aggressive in their media presence as a general rule.) Based on chatter on TikTok and Reddit, this was actually supposed to be the Bridgeway Station logo that was to be placed. If true, then it would have made sense for there to have been furtive fanfare about it, but it received next to no media coverage at all.
Maybe management did realize, too late to undo the deal, that there was reason to be concerned about negative public reaction to the sculpture. Instead of cancelling the installation--the best thing for the community--they downplayed it to the hilt and decided to just endure the backlash once it was up.
We actually end up with the best possible result, but no thanks to "the powers that be." Perhaps now all contributors to this debacle (including the sculptor) will act for the greater good. For Hughes Investments, the most obvious action is to offer monetary compensation to people who live within a certain radius of BridgeWay Station. These are only rough guidelines--the local residents who have been so affected will have to set specific terms, and of course will have to make their voices heard to bring it about. I would offer credits at BridgeWay Station-based businesses, but also include another option for people who may consider BridgeWay too "fu-fu." There's clearly a culture clash between the development and the pre-existing community.
So besides credit at BridgeWay, prepaid debit cards or gift cards for a locally accessible department or grocery store should also be offered. A lesser payout for that option would be OK--say $50 credit at BridgeWay would be $40-$45 elsewhere. I would suggest 10-20 miles as a geo radius, or maybe just include every adult in Greenville, Mauldin, and Simpsonville.
I am putting forth ideas on how the sculptor can redeem himself in a review for Bridgeway Station Logo Sculpture. I have just added that location and it is appearing now, but if you can't find it, try looking for the same location on Google Maps; the review also appears there.
Meanwhile, definitely do go to the bridge and look at the view--it's a 5!