Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Services - Asvar Law

    Health, injury and disability

    Asvar Law Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Asvar Law

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    11 months ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Louis L.
    177
    22
    3

    4 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 2
    Oh no 0

    5 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    6 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Asvar Law

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    People searched for Personal Injury Law 28,781 times last month within 20 miles of this business.

    Verify this business

    Nadrich­ Accident Injury Lawyers

    Nadrich­ Accident Injury Lawyers

    3.9
    (61 reviews)

    Nadrich Law Corporation Review PERSPECTIVE CLIENTS BEWARE:…read moreNEEDING ADA II, III, or Section 505 Federal Civil Litigation Representation, THEY DO NOT PRACTICE THIS TYPE OF LAW!!! I contacted Nadrich Law Corporation because I was led to believe the firm handled ADA Title II, ADA Title III, Section 504 disability-discrimination, and civil-rights matters. My case was not a personal-injury matter and not an employment-law matter. It involved an already-filed higher-education disability-discrimination case against a university, including ADA/Section 504 accommodations, retaliation, degree-completion obstruction, transcript issues, and interference with an academic/licensure pathway. Before the call, I clearly explained in writing that this was not an employment case and asked that the matter be reassessed as a higher-education ADA/Section 504 civil-rights matter. I also specifically asked that I not be referred elsewhere unless the referral was appropriate for that specific type of case. In my experience, the firm did not listen carefully to what I was saying. What is advertised or represented by a law firm online should match what the firm actually handles. After reviewing Nadrich Law Corporation's listed practice areas, they appear to focus on personal injury and related claims, including vehicle accidents, slip and fall, dog bites, hazardous exposure, defective products, sexual abuse, and wrongful death. Those practice areas are not the same as higher-education ADA/Section 504 disability-discrimination litigation. Instead of meaningfully confirming whether my matter was within their actual scope, I was passed to another law firm without first confirming with me that the referral was appropriate. That second intake also appeared mismatched and did not reflect the ADA/Section 504 higher-education issues I had described. I later received a declination stating that attorneys had made every effort to explore all possible avenues and did not believe there was a meritorious claim they could pursue. However, from my perspective, I did not speak with an attorney from Nadrich, and I do not believe there was an in-depth review of the facts, documents, procedural posture, ADA/Section 504 issues, retaliation concerns, licensure-pathway facts, or federal court filings. Law firms are allowed to decline representation. That is not the issue. The issue is a rushed and mismatched intake process that gave the impression my matter had been legally evaluated when, in my experience, it had not been meaningfully reviewed by an attorney. For complex ADA, Section 504, higher-education, or federal civil-rights matters, I would strongly recommend researching carefully and confirming upfront whether the firm actually handles that specific type of case. A proper intake should involve listening carefully, understanding the legal issue, accurately conveying the facts to an attorney, and having an attorney or qualified legal professional explain whether the case fits the firm's scope. Based on my experience, I found the process unprofessional, inattentive, and not properly matched to the type of legal matter I brought to them. I would look elsewhere.

    Josh assisted me and my family. As we were affected by the fires. He provided excellent service…read morethat I recommend him to all my friends and neighbors. We'll forever use Nadrich as our attorneys for everything including personal injury. We had a great experience, they turned a horrible experience in a better much easier one.

    McNicholas & McNicholas

    McNicholas & McNicholas

    4.1
    (20 reviews)

    Well, they don't really get back to customers. Intake call…read moretook over a week. Then i was supposed to get a follow up call within 5 days which never happened. Just do what you say you will do, pretty basic.

    My experience with this firm was extremely frustrating and, at times, concerning. From early on, I…read morefelt that the potential value of my case was presented in an overly optimistic and, ultimately, misleading way. The numbers and expectations that were discussed initially set a certain level of confidence, but as things progressed, it became clear that those projections were not grounded in a realistic outcome. What made this worse was the lack of clear, consistent communication around how those estimates were being calculated. I was not given a transparent breakdown of the factors that could significantly reduce the value of the case, nor was there enough effort to reset expectations once it became obvious that the initial outlook was unlikely. Instead, I was left feeling like I had been guided toward a perception of my case that didn't reflect reality. Communication overall was inconsistent. There were delays in responses, limited proactive updates, and a general sense that I had to push for clarity rather than it being provided upfront. When you're dealing with something as serious as a lawsuit, that kind of uncertainty adds unnecessary stress and undermines trust. To be clear, the firm may have experience, but my issue is with how expectations were managed and communicated. Clients rely heavily on their attorneys for honest, realistic guidance. In my case, I don't feel that standard was met. I would strongly caution anyone considering this firm to ask very direct, detailed questions about how they evaluate case value, what assumptions they are making, and how those expectations might change over time. Without that clarity, you may find yourself in a situation similar to mine--feeling misinformed and disappointed.

    Asvar Law - personal_injury - Updated June 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...