Millie and Tom were so supportive and helped me feel relief during a stressful time! I was educated…read moreabout the process and reassured not to feel guilty or ashamed. Would recommend them 100%.

First off, Joshi is an amazing human being and lawyer! I provided the details of my situation…read moreregarding a debt collector and Joshi provided a clear and concise consultation as well as roadmap on how to prep, approach and implement the strategy. I am grateful for her services and not to mention, Joshi is a is down to earth person who will listen with empathy and provide a holistic expert advice! Thank you again Joshi!!! If you choose Joshi, you have a person who will kindly take care of you on your situation!

We had a great experience working with Chandler. He was consistently available, responsive, and…read moreultimately helped us secure 100% of our funds through a lien against the investor's property--without the need for litigation. While we didn't always agree on every step along the way, we trusted his judgment and strategy, and that trust paid off. He respected both our time and our money, kept us informed, and stayed focused on the end goal. We truly appreciate his dedication and would ABSOLUTELY RECOMMEND him to anyone navigating a complex real estate or investment dispute. Thank you Chandler!!

My husband is a blind person. We hired Webb group to help us with a road access issue that was…read morebeyond critical to us with very high stakes. Lendan said it would normally cost between $3 and $5 K to resolve (we expected more of course and budgeted $10K). Please read our final exchange below and decide if this is who you want or can count on as your advocate. BTW at the end of negotiations that you have already invested/paid $20K. This follows immediately after meeting where Lendan proposed a 2 year delay strategy, he wanted to get paid for 2 more years! This after multiple emails saying we were at the end of our financial rope. During his 2 year strategy pitch he was berating and blaming us for not providing easement information. He said clearly on a video recorded by him that he would wipe our bill out if we could prove we sent it to the firm. He had that proof the next AM. Provided in a document upload and narrative provided in January, still waiting for that check. It was basically pay up more or the heck with you. Choose wisely they are a billing machine! FROM US Please find below our review of Webb billing and deductions we are taking in the amount of $1895 for you to review at your cost. This should place our account current including our retainer. It seems reasonable to get their response and then decide if addition funds are needed given our desperate financial situation. We have begged for understanding as we are broken on this financially way over expectations that were set by you (of course we expected to go over by a couple few K). Yet virtually all approaches and suggestions have been open ended and long term. We have no choice but to challenge that approach at this point we are out of money and there has been no ROI to this point but we have been hoping. We want to be clear again we like everyone we have met at Webb. But if you could have advised us better.. Can They, Can we? We would have made different decisions If you had researched the easement stuff we provided in January We wouldn't have been educated by opposing counsel if we didn't have to reexplain and reexplain the details we gave you We would have been and stayed on the same page If you were as prepared as opposing counsel on the facts before engaging We wouldnt need new approaches and back work then we wouldn't be in this position and no where near the time and money invested. We are not trying to be mean but it's just fact. We do feel your many proposed strategies were at least partially influenced by money and not by practical understanding and interpretation of the facts with sound advice. Our approach is to continue to work with you and try and focus the effort. You threatened 3 times, now 4 that we should do it ourselves, blamed us, called us hostile and hung up on us. We are still here $20K in. So again it is your decision if you want to continue. We are not quitters and don't throw away relationships. We did not wish to write this email but you are pushing us around just as hard as the (opposing entity). Thank you and all the best Sandy and Steve From Lenden Thank you for explaining, I see no promise of payment here, so we will send an email to opposing counsel to communicate directly with you from tomorrow forward. I have moved staff off thread so they can be re-assigned. Sincerely, Lenden F. Webb WEBB LAW GROUP, APC

Kyle is extremely knowledgeable and very helpful! I would absolutely recommend him to anyone…read morelooking for a real estate lawyer.

Holy Cow, Batman!…read more Kyle Yaege and Rob Robinson at Hickman Robinson Yaege rescued my life savings from criminals. Kyle and Rob are my real life Batman and Robin.

I rang this morning to get some answers with regard to landlord/tenant law. Charles answered the…read morephone himself, which was a surprise. He informed me that this area of law was not his firm's specialty, however, he was happy to help me. He answered my questions and explained his reasoning. I have been a legal assistant for 35 years and was more impressed with him in 10 minutes, than I've been with most attorneys over the years. Thanks Charles!

As a business owner, I was impressed by Charles' desire to deliver value to me as a customer, even…read morethough there was nothing in it for him! More businesses and individuals should do the same thing! I called after hours and left a voicemail hoping to get a response next day. It turned out that the problem I described in my voicemail was not even something this office specializes in. Charles called me back within 10 minutes (still after hours) just to give me some recommendations and point in the right direction! He did not really have to call back, and I am sure at 6pm he had other things to do, but he called back and took care of me! Now, that's great customer service! If you are looking for someone who is going to handle your problems as their own - Charles is the right man!

Alex schack and his staff helped my wife and I through a very difficult time. They were always…read moreaccommodating, compassionate and truthful. Geoff stayed in constant contact with updates of our case and solid suggestions. They worked hard and long to get a very equitable settlement. We would definately recommend and use the Alexander Schack Law Group again.

From the owner: The Law Offices of Alex Schack is one of the core members of the fire victims' trial team,…read morePlainitffs' Core Group-1. It was our firm that successfully opposed SDG&E in court, extending the deadline to file claims from the 2007 fires. We can still file a claim for you. If you are among those who were affected by the fires, please call Alex, Geoff, or Kathy today and let's discuss your options.

Working with Hoffman & Forde -- specifically Mike Dicks -- was one of the most frustrating…read moreprofessional experiences I've ever had. My sister and I hired the firm to represent us in a construction defect case involving our home. At first, our case was assigned to a junior attorney. When that attorney left the firm, Mike Dicks took over. From that point on, the entire process became far more stressful and chaotic than it needed to be. Instead of feeling like our attorney was advocating for us, it constantly felt like we were being pressured, dismissed, or talked down to. Any time we asked questions or pushed back on changes, we were treated as if we were the problem. One of the most maddening patterns was being told that parts of the settlement agreement were "final." We were repeatedly told we could not make further changes. Then the defense would make additional changes anyway, and suddenly those changes were allowed. When we asked questions about those changes, we were told we were jeopardizing the deal. This happened over and over again and created constant confusion about what was actually finalized and what wasn't. Another major issue was the lack of attention to detail. We provided extensive documentation of the problems with our house, including photos and written descriptions. Despite that, several critical issues were not properly addressed in the settlement scope. My sister repeatedly had to review and redline documents herself just to correct errors or omissions that should have been caught by our attorney. A perfect example involves two large floor-to-ceiling windows. Multiple experts who walked through the house suspected those windows were leaking, but we did not yet have clear documentation of water intrusion. Then, right around the time we were being pushed to sign earlier versions of the settlement agreement, a storm came through. During that storm my sister was able to record water visibly running down the inside of one of the windows. Despite that evidence, those windows were still not included in the final settlement scope, even though they were clearly part of the water intrusion issues affecting the property. The office also seemed extremely disorganized. We were asked multiple times for documents we had already provided. Outdated versions of the settlement agreement were circulated and referred to as the final version. At times it genuinely felt like no one was carefully reviewing the documents being sent to us. We were also repeatedly told the defendants were essentially insolvent and that we needed to accept the settlement because there was no money to pursue. When we asked how that determination had been made, the only documentation referenced was a financial disclosure sheet completed by the defendant himself listing limited assets. We were never informed if the actual business's financial records had been reviewed. Throughout all of this, the firm's partner, Daniel Forde, was copied on many of the communications but never stepped in to address the obvious problems. To be clear, the construction work that is now being completed at the property has addressed many of the defects. In fact, the damage turned out to be so extensive that the contractors ultimately ended up doing far more work than what was originally contemplated in the settlement. But that outcome came despite the legal representation, not because of it. What should have been professional legal guidance instead turned into months of unnecessary stress, confusion, and frustration. Far too often it felt like we were the ones doing the detailed review work while also paying legal fees. If you are considering hiring Hoffman & Forde, I strongly recommend asking very direct questions about who will actually handle your case and how closely documents will be reviewed before anything is finalized. Our experience with Mike Dicks was chaotic, exhausting, and deeply disappointing.

We hired Hoffman & Forde to represent us in a construction defect case involving our home…read more Initially, we were assigned a junior attorney. After that attorney left the firm, the senior attorney on the case, Mike Dicks, took over. From that point forward, the experience deteriorated significantly. My sister and I genuinely dreaded seeing Mike's name appear in our inbox. Interactions with him were consistently stressful, confusing, and unproductive. Instead of feeling like our attorney was advocating for us, we often felt pressured, dismissed, or talked down to. One of the biggest problems was communication and consistency. Mike frequently declared things "final" instead of asking for our input. Later, the defense would make additional changes and those changes would suddenly be allowed. When we asked questions or pushed back, we were told we were jeopardizing the deal or creating problems. This happened repeatedly and made an already stressful legal process even more frustrating. Another major issue was the lack of attention to detail and organization. Despite providing extensive documentation and photos of the defects in our home, several important items were not properly addressed in the settlement scope. We repeatedly had to review and redline documents ourselves to correct errors or omissions that should have been caught by our attorney. At one point, outdated versions of the settlement agreement kept being circulated and referred to as the final version. Despite raising concerns, the version that ultimately ended up executed still reflected earlier drafts that had known issues. In addition, two large floor-to-ceiling windows that we had documented leaking with video evidence were not included in the settlement scope. Repairing those windows could cost tens of thousands of dollars out of pocket, despite being verbally agreed upon during mediation. Another troubling issue involved the claim that the defendants were essentially insolvent. When we asked how that conclusion was reached, we were told that the defense provided a financial disclosure sheet completed by the defendant himself listing a house owned by his wife. Despite the defendant owning a construction business, our attorneys did not obtain the financial records or tax returns of the business owned by the defendant. That left us with serious questions about how the insolvency conclusion was reached. The office also appeared extremely disorganized. We were asked multiple times for documents we had already provided, including basic tax information, and there were frequent email exchanges correcting mistakes or clarifying issues that should have been handled internally. What made the experience especially concerning was that the firm's partner, Daniel Forde, was copied on many of these communications but never stepped in to address the issues. To be clear, the construction work that is now being completed at our house has ultimately addressed many of the defects. In fact, because the damage to the house turned out to be more extensive than anticipated, the defendants ended up doing significantly more work than what was originally contemplated in the settlement. That is one of the few silver linings in an otherwise extremely frustrating process. However, the legal representation itself was disappointing. We expected an attorney who would carefully review documents, communicate clearly, and advocate for our interests. Instead, we often felt like we were the ones doing the detailed review work ourselves while also paying for legal services. If you are considering hiring Hoffman & Forde, I would strongly encourage you to ask detailed questions about who will actually handle your case and how closely documents and settlement terms will be reviewed before anything is finalized. Our experience with Mike Dicks was disorganized, stressful, and far below the level of professionalism we expected when hiring legal counsel.

I had a real-estate issue I was researching. Jack Lieb addressed my questions and concerns…read morepromptly, professionally and to my full satisfaction. I enthusiastically recommend this firm.

I have used Lieb & Lieb attorney service many times and won every case. Jack & Richard are the best…read moreand very professional and polite. Both know the letter of the law and know how the legal

Craig called me back in a timely manner- same day and offered me expert advice on a rodent…read moreinfestation. Extremely professional, eloquent, and surprisingly personable. He was straight forward, yet took time to empathize with my situation sincerely. Will definitely recommend his services to anybody dealing with tenancy issues.

Mr. Craig Fagan, is a great Attorney, he gets down to business, when nobody seemed to believe in my…read morecase, he did, and with him backing me, due to his experience and prestige, he won my case. I was so nervous upon arrival and the overall process in general, but he is so easy to talk and relate to. He made the process a breeze, I recommend Mr. Fagan. He is responsive, realistic, and down to earth, an overall cool guy. I hope not, but if I ever so happen to need someone to represent me for these particular cases he's experienced in, I will reach out to him without a doubt. He represented me well, and he has what it takes to get the job done.