Children, first (and always). School / Board of Education agendas, second. Though hopefully there is rarely a conflict between the two.
Of course agendas, like rules, are necessary; esepcially in the day to day operations of a large institution or organization that is comprised of many, many differing individuals with differing needs - no argument there.
However, those in charge cannot be so bound by agendas and rules that they react (or worse, retaliate) whenever there is any pushback. The ability to absorb, contain, critically analyze input and potential outcomes, apply that critical analysis, consider and then reconsider and finally be flexible if/when necessary (perhaps even "not sweating the small stuff"), should be an integral part of a profession that deals with children (and their parents!).
Push and pull will always be a part of a child's development - and is always present in any sistuation that involves more than 2 people. An inability to flex or let go (when a little "give" is in order), or being held inside the confines of a box (of "standards") -- this should be a problem confined to those 6-11 year olds, not adults in the field of education.
Also: if you ask for solutions, be prepared to present your own.
But here is a grain of salt to take with the above comments:
MME school is a very good school, so, hence the solid 3 stars. Perhaps approaching 4 stars(but YELP has no option for a half star). This school probably deserves the top tier ranking among Hawaii elementary schools, as well as the 4-star ranking on GreatSchools.org. At the end of the day, all Hawaii schools (as is true of any school in ANY state) are, to a great extent, a product of the Board of Education. So any critique of a individual school may be better directed at the BOE. Though this cannot account for the negative experiences in the area of direct family/child-to-teacher/administration interactions that some have had (as are described on other websites like GreatSchools.org). This issue is school-specific.
Most websites and journals rank schools according to a multitude of parameters (each parameters given a score and/or a "weight" in the overall score or ranking). The value of "well-roundedness" aside, academics is paramount to me, as a parent. The overall ranking of a school is, of course, a useful tool and good to have - but many of the components of a school's ranking involve components that (IMO), long range are not as impactful / important (with regard to long range outcomes for the child such as future academic performance and eventual post-school "success"); for example: "parent satisfaction with resources available". Some may give a "10 out of 10" based largely on the fact that MME school employs the use of iPads. The use of iPads is not, in itself, particularly impressive to me (though I am grateful to see any school step into the 21st century, technologically). Results (academic) speak louder than most items on parent satisfaction surveys. So, in this regard, MME school is top tier.
The way forward: personally, I would like to see some more "humanism" (?), if that's a good way to describe what I want to convey. I sometimes get the sense that being able to say, "we are following all the guidelines and all boxes were checked today; our rates of this and that and out scores on this and that are within target range or superior to other schools" is more important than knowing the individual student or connecting with the parent(s). Comments by other parents on other websites reflect the same concerns as mine. I suppose to the school's defense, I can relate to the pressure to stay within set parameters and to meet guidelines. This is happening in the corporate world, medicine and many other lareg-scale institutions. Not only do schools have to answer to a "higher God" (the BOE) but they must also walk the fine line between the BOE and trying to satisfy hundreds of parents.
I hope this critique is taken constructively - but you will notice that IT IS written ANONYMOUSLY (for a reason! I do not want my child to become a target and suffer as a result!). read more