My family saw Nadine, our sons were exposed to her "approach" and we learned: She is an ardent follower/promoter of the "alienation" idea created by Gardner - Nadine is an acolyte of Gardner, Childress, and rest of the "alienation" camp. Gardner created this concept to protect child molesters' access to children. Google and you will see photos of her with the "alienation" organizations, with certifications from Childress' biased and unproven "PA" course. Here is what Gardner believes, and what Nadine forces on children - child abuse via "reunification therapy" with abusers: https://stopabusecampaign.org/campaigns/family-court-custody-crisis/parental-alienation-syndrome/ "Alienation" was debunked YEARS ago and is not recognized by the APA or other psychological organizations. This is well-known, there is NO evidence-based proof that therapeutic approaches forcing children to visit/reunite with harmful parents is good for children, and actual evidence shows it PERMANENTLY HARMS CHILDREN - i.e. Nadine's approach is causing trauma to children. Nadine is ignorant of, or chooses to ignore all current research that totally defeats her views and techniques, to the incredible detriment of children. She needs to open her eyes outside of the Gardner/Childress cult and actually prevent harm to children as should have been her credo. However she is so biased, this seems unlikely. She is unconcerned with abuse, child welfare, child's views/wishes, or even taking a neutral fact finding approach. She incredibly does not even care about domestic violence convictions, abuse, nor substance abuse. She views everything through a preconceived and intractable lens of "alienation" thus pleas made by parents regarding legitimate abuse and safety concerns for children are summarily dismissed as the protective parent simply "alienating" the other parent and the child being "directed" by the protective parent, with no evidence, simply her own personal "feeling," thus she immediately sides with the abuser with zero regard for the child's experiences or mental health. She is not capable/qualified to understand personality disorders such as narcissistic or antisocial personalities, which are common in custody cases in which there is disagreement and claims of abuse by one party. Most often, conflict is driven by the parent with the personality disorder and the other parent (and child) are being victimized through coercive control, legal abuse, financial abuse, and smear campaigns in court (i.e. claims of "alienation" against the protective parent.) Nadine contributes to this furthering of abuse against the protective parent and thus to the detriment, risk, and harm to the child that will continue for years. Most concerning is the fact that she may influence custody cases in family court. Custody decisions in which children's SAFETY is not placed above "parental rights" have led to the deaths of many hundreds of children, and the ongoing sexual, physical, and psychological abuse of millions. Nadine is part of the problem of the broken family court system that does nothing to protect children, and places abusive parents' rights above all. Large-scale, empirical, longitudinal studies of cases show that courts favor fathers, even abusive fathers, over mothers, ESPECIALLY in cases with even adjudicated/proven/witnessed abuse of the child. Please read more below. Maybe someday, some way, someone will care that Nadine, the latest darling of family courts in PA, who has hundreds of clients and is making a fortune off children's lives, is NOT NEUTRAL, NOT QUALIFIED, AND NOT SAFE for children. She is not unbiased, does not use evidence-based, accepted psychological/therapeutic approaches, and is only working to further her own personal opinions based in nothing but the harmful propaganda she aligns herself with. SHE IS PLACING CHILDREN IN HARM'S WAY! And courts in PA have given her carte blanche to do so. https://www.law.gwu.edu/national-family-violence-law-center?fbclid=IwAR2ukOew1YDIUnqlsErCWDnCvIp_N4lpEGbkwPG7yDK2Rpc-BjVQ5AN9W-U http://www.custody-peace.org/uploads/1/8/5/1/18512926/2021.08.01_claim_un.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3uQ1v-8T2mJfc6KykzPkMp5omx3mlOzoqa0EJ-VPVDqOCc8-38uvtSGgg https://www.buckscountycouriertimes.com/story/opinion/2021/11/13/advocate-kaydens-law-childrens-safety-family-court/6390111001/ https://theconversation.com/parental-alienation-the-debunked-theory-that-women-lie-about-violence-is-still-used-in-court-125823 https://www.forbes.com/sites/patriciafersch/2021/03/29/parental-alienation-as-a-defense-to-allegations-of-domestic-violence-and-allegations-of-child-sexual-abuse/?sh=15dab4c225c3 https://www.highconflicteducationandresources.com/parental-alienation https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jul/21/abused-uk-children-family-courts-parental-alienation https://www.socialworktoday.com/archive/092109p26.shtml https://thecourtsaid.org/2021/05/28/parental-alienation-discredited-unscientific-nazi-theory read more

Unprofessional and fraudulent. Textbook example of unethical. If you just want someone to talk to and you agree with her, you'll be OK. If you know anything about therapeutic treatment, she'll quit on you. read more

This is what Nadine can't even see... https://www.socialworkdegreeguide.com/lists/5-signs-of-parental-alienation/ read more