1. Roscha & Odne

1. Roscha & Odne

0

Concord, CA

Cancel

Open app

Search

Roscha & Odne

3.7 (6 reviews)
Open • 9:00 am - 5:00 pm

Services - Roscha & Odne

Business litigation

Real estate law

Roscha & Odne Photos

You might also consider

Recommended Reviews - Roscha & Odne

Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
Yelp app icon
Browse more easily on the app
Review Feed Illustration

7 years ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

7 years ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

4 years ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0
Photo of Elle H.
125
8
0

7 years ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 1
Love this 0
Oh no 0

7 years ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

7 years ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

Ask the Community - Roscha & Odne

You might also consider

Verify this business for free

People searched for General Litigation 622 times last month within 20 miles of this business.

Verify this business

Law Office of Robert A. Miller

Law Office of Robert A. Miller

4.5
(8 reviews)

Continuing from first review…read more.. Robert A. Miller made me subpoena a former roommate in order to get her to be a witness. This was unnecessary as her email to me was sufficient. Additionally, there are many instances where Robert A. Miller and David M. Sternberg revealed that they did not examine all of the evidence that I provided. Robert A. Miller kept stressing issues of my pet cat's bodily functions. There was not a single complaint (no email or text, but only something the landlord wanted to add to her retaliatory eviction) of cat urine smell from my two roommates and their partners. I stated that numerous friends of mine have visited and can be witnesses to support that cat urine smell was never an issue. Robert A. Miller responded that the plaintiff Juliet Welch would then call on the other four downstairs tenants as witnesses of cat urine smell. How can downstairs tenants witness what happens in my upstairs apartment when the units are separate and the downstairs tenants and upstairs tenants are not friends and therefore the downstairs tenants are never invited inside the upstairs unit. Moreover, the downstairs tenants have a senior dog and a new puppy, both of whom require puppy pads and potty training. The downstairs tenants also dogsit. There are multiple animals at the 61 Franciscan Way address. A week before my conference court date, Robert A. Miller and David M. Sternberg required an additional $18,000 in order to represent me, essentially abandoning me. At which point, I asked them to stop work. My new counsel reached a settlement of my staying until the end of December (as opposed to October) and $9000 in new money. The attorney fee agreement clearly states that the $5,000 (the one where I gave $10,000) would ensure the case goes to a jury trial. This is a breach of contract, fiduciary duty, and fraud. Neither Robert A. Miller nor David M. Sternberg went over the retainer fee agreement with me. As a matter of fact, David M. Sternberg did not even sign the retainer fee agreement until August 14th, 2019 after receiving the additional $5,000 (where I gave $10,000). I filed a Ca State Bar Mandatory fee dispute in Feb. 2022. Robert A. Miller answered to serve David M. Sternberg who did not agree to be served until November 2022. Robert A. Miller and David M. Sternberg ignored the CA State Bar Mandatory fee dispute so that the statute of limitations would expire. Robert A. Miller and David M. Sternberg responded after I filed small claims because the CA State Bar Dispute was not going anywhere. I called everyday and left messages and CA State Bar only responded once when I received a call back that they will not discipline attorneys for not answering. At the small claims court date, David M. Sternberg twisted the fee dispute to become legal malpractice to claim a one year statute of limitation. I never used the language of legal malpractice in any of my communication with Robert A. Miller and David M. Sternberg. Robert A. Miller and David M. Sternberg set themselves up nicely so that they can claim that any court proceeding waives my rights to pursue a fee dispute with Ca State Bar. Robert A. Miller and David M. Sternberg are unscrupulous lawyers who are greedy and take advantage of vulnerable clients.

I am having a difficult time getting my landlord to complete payment of relocation expenses as…read moreagreed upon. I reached out to the Law offices of Robert Miller to see what steps I could take and what to do next since my requests to the landlord are going unanswered. Mr. Miller called me back within 24hrs of me reaching out and was very thorough in explaining what steps I should take before reaching the point of needing to officially engage legal counsel. Legal fees can add up quickly and I appreciated him pointing me in the right direction during our phone consultation. I intend on following his guidance and because of his willingness to help without my retaining him, when the time comes to engage counsel with this matter, I will absolutely be using his services. Thank you Robert!

Alves Radcliffe

Alves Radcliffe

4.2
(5 reviews)

Both have the temperament and experience you need. Diligent and determined to win…read more Answered calls, informative and up front. Very strategic and met all timelines. Reasonable $ for the professionalism you receive. I have referred to multiple colleagues all with positive experiences.

It will be very difficult to communicate and stress what Scott Radcliffe has done for me and what…read morean incredible lawyer he truly is. When I went to Scott to get a second opinion because I felt that my current lawyer was fraudulently billing me, and that there had been little progress in my current case he reviewed the charges and agreed I indeed was being unfairly billed. It's typical I realize, lawyers padding their billing hours but this was seemingly more than that. Much more. I fired the lawyer who had taken so much of my money and neglected to do anything on my case, while Scott went to work not only getting my money back (yes all of it), but pushing insurance to cover the charges rather than it coming out of pocket. While the other lawyers attached to the case on other sides weren't doing their jobs or keeping their clients apprised of progress or any news in the case, I knew every step, good or bad.. every scenario, every single detail that transpired and guess what ?? Not only do I have all of my money back, and insurance ended up covering me because of Scott.. my case is finally over and I can get a good night's sleep again!!! I will never use anyone else to represent me and I recommend you take the same position !!

Roscha & Odne - general_litigation - Updated July 2026

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...