Cancel

    Search

    Solutions Based Family Law

    3.7 (3 reviews)
    Closed Closed

    Request a consultation

    Response time

    20 minutes

    Response rate

    100%

    Services - Solutions Based Family Law

    Solutions Based Family Law Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Solutions Based Family Law

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    4 months ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    10 months ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Business owner information

    Photo of Kendyl D.

    Kendyl D.

    Thank you very much for your kind words Ric!

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Solutions Based Family Law

    You might also consider

    Márquez Law - Managing Partner Jason Márquez

    Márquez Law

    (10 reviews)

    Southeast

    We retained Jason Marquez based on his strong initial presentation and positive Google reviews. At…read morethe outset, he indicated that achieving a 50/50 parenting schedule and joint decision-making authority was realistic. Unfortunately, after working with him for approximately five to six years, we were deeply disappointed with the level of advocacy, professionalism, and follow-through provided. While Mr. Marquez was capable of drafting emails and filing motions, his courtroom advocacy consistently fell short. During hearings, he failed to adequately challenge inaccurate claims made by the opposing party, did not contest evidence he later acknowledged was flawed or misused, and did not meaningfully advocate when a judge relied on incorrect information to modify our parenting time. Our original custody schedule was every Tuesday and every other weekend--yet under his representation, our Tuesdays were actually taken away. Aside from securing a 50/50 schedule during the summer months, there was little substantive progress toward the goals we were initially told were achievable. Communication and timeliness were also major issues. On one occasion, Mr. Marquez stated an important email would be handled within a couple of days, but no action was taken for nearly two weeks despite multiple follow-ups. A "final" version of that email was not provided until more than a month later, causing unnecessary delays. He later admitted that he should have met with us in person or by phone rather than relying on prolonged email exchanges, stating that the back-and-forth had left him confused about our objectives. By the end, it was clear he no longer understood what we were trying to accomplish. He repeatedly stated that his email inbox functions as his to-do list, meaning clients must send multiple reminder emails just to ensure tasks are addressed. Billing practices further compounded these concerns. We were charged full amounts for work that did not meet promised timelines or outcomes. Commitments outlined in his own contract were not consistently honored, yet billing continued regardless. We were left responsible for costs associated with delays and unmet assurances, including a closing letter that lacked a file he had promised would be included. Additionally, Mr. Marquez represented my mother in her divorce case, and her experience closely mirrored ours--minimal courtroom advocacy, little strategic effort, and substantial fees despite limited progress. Taken together, these experiences raise serious concerns about consistency, accountability, and overall value. We were also troubled by aspects of his professional conduct. He routinely ended calls by referring to us as "kids," which felt dismissive, disrespectful, and indicative of how little he valued his clients. Given the length of representation and the significant financial investment, we expected far more proactive advocacy, transparency, and strategic leadership. Unfortunately, our experience did not meet those expectations. I would not recommend Mr. Marquez to anyone seeking meaningful progress in a custody case. With a caseload of 90+ clients, it became clear that our matter was lost in the shuffle.

    He came recommended to me by a friend, and I am very sorry that I went with him over several others…read morethat I had talked to. I needed a Bull Dog in court, and that is not what I got. Jason is very pricy for the service provided, and had very little fight in him during my divorce. I felt like he was just interested in taking my money, and did not fight for me in court. Would not recommend him for divorce cases. He got beat by an attorney that had been practicing for 4 years, when I provided him so much evidence to get me more than what I got from the Judge. He cost me over 30k to get screwed!! He charged me over $2600 in post divorce filings, which amounted to about 4 hours of work from him and his office. One final note, one of the 5 star reviews, is from his office manager. Conflict of interest????

    Modern Family Law

    Modern Family Law

    (35 reviews)

    Southeast

    I hired Modern Family Law in December 2025 for a prenuptial agreement and paid $6,169.66 under an…read morehourly fee agreement. It was one of the more frustrating professional experiences I've had. In late March, my attorney sent a revised draft to opposing counsel without tracked changes and acknowledged in writing that he had forgotten to turn them on. Opposing counsel asked for a marked version on April 1. Nothing was sent for the next 15 days, while I was left assuming my matter was moving forward. On April 17, the firm told me in writing that the redlines had been sent to opposing counsel. Opposing counsel confirmed in writing, twice, that she never received them. The firm later acknowledged they had not been sent. Finding that out is what ended my confidence in them entirely. I was offered a $500 credit toward the billing dispute. When I accepted the firm's offer to close the matter, that credit was withdrawn. My file was closed with a $57 charge for preparing the closing letter. I ended up hiring new counsel to finish the work, months later than I should have. Every statement above is supported by emails I still have, including correspondence from opposing counsel. If you work with this firm, document everything and confirm independently that work you're billed for was actually done.

    We paid a $3750 retainer. Over several months, substantial fees were billed for internal strategy…read moreconferences, while key case actions appeared delayed. When funds were nearly depleted, counsel moved to withdraw during a critical phase, leaving us to seek replacement counsel under pressure. We also disputed an unauthorized $1,300 debit after written assurances billing would come from trust funds. Based on our experience, we cannot recommend this representation. Kathryn Johnson was the attorney and my opinion is she's no asset to her firm and poor at being an attorney.

    Solutions Based Family Law - divorce - Updated September 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...