*AI SLOP* DO NOT HIRE…read more I hired Kayla and her firm to review a commercial lease and advise me on a minor billing dispute with my landlord (a $15 administrative fee on a third party bill). From the start, I made it clear that this wasn't about the amount, but about standing up for what was right under the terms of my lease. They said they could help. What I received in return for roughly six hours of billed time (around $2,400) was a memorandum that read exactly like what people call "AI slop" generic, repetitive, and almost entirely restating what I had already written in my own intake summary email. There was no meaningful legal analysis or application of the lease provisions, and several of my questions were completely ignored or misunderstood. It was exactly as if I just copied and pasted the email I sent to them and generated a "lease review". I went and tried it myself and got almost EXACTLY the same "lease review". It really missed the human element. An entire paragraph was dedicated to how if it wasn't a third party bill then they are correct in charging me this. This paragraph was the most obvious giveaway as I made it clear by uploading the bill and stating it on the phone this is a third party bill. This didn't make it to the AI slop "lease review" they generated because in my email text it wasn't specified, and typical of AI responses, they touch all the bases. When I followed up to clarify, the responses continued to miss the point. It felt like a mix of human element with AI assistance even with my communications with Kayla, so it caused a few email back and forths. I raised concern that the memo appeared to have been prepared using AI or some automated drafting tool, since it lacked the depth and reasoning expected of an attorney. That question was never addressed. To make matters worse, after taking on my case fully aware of the limited monetary value of the dispute, I was told only after the bill was run up that the issue was too small for the firm to pursue -- and that I should handle it myself in small claims court. This experience felt unprofessional, ethically questionable, and entirely inconsistent with the transparency expected under the California Rules of Professional Conduct. I do not recommend this firm for anyone expecting a genuine attorney review or personalized legal work. Furthermore I stand by my claim that what I received was AI slop, and am happy to share with anyone what I received so they can see it for themselves. Email me at boba29428@gmail.com if you're interested. As far as I'm concerned I paid $2400 for AI slop and a few back and forth emails to clarify AI slop.

I know the reason why people hate attorneys. And the way this firm works is one reason behind it. I…read morespend $10,000 to resolve Absolutely nothing they led me in the wrong direction. They had all of the information and for two months we're trying to go after an individual that I believe was wrong and it took him two months to tell me oh we can't go after him. It has to be this other person total waste of time total waste of money and on top of that I get my last invoice and which they charge me just to talk to me about canceling my counsel. In order to save you guys money don't go here. Total fraud waste of freaking time..

Christina was an amazing attorney. Thank you for fighting through very difficult case. My dentist…read morewas a criminal and I had such a hard time to find an attorney. I finally found an attorney who will fight then covid happened and he declined his health somehow God guided me to Christina. Her office was very helpful and my case went smoothly after she took my case. I wish I found her when I was having an issue with my criminal Dentest. Christina is handling another case with my criminal Dentest. Hope she will can him from the dentistry. A great news is I got a call from the CA dental association, my dentist is on 6 month probation. It took 4 yrs to settle my case. It takes time but I truly appreciate her hard work.

I would 100% recommend Denning Moores, APC for anyone's needs. I had the hardest time finding a…read morepersonal law attorney to take my case. Just when I thought all hope was lost, I received that fateful Godsend call from Bridget. I later met with Christina to discuss my very complex case and will forever be grateful and thankful for her having accepted my case and for their knowledge and patience with my many questions. Thank you Christina and staff!

I had never needed to hire a lawyer prior to contacting Good Hemme, but we had an incredibly…read moredifficult situation arise with an unruly and unstable neighbor whose sewer mainline runs underneath our back and front yard. It had been leaking and she was unwilling to fix it, and the county was doing nothing to help push her into doing the correct and neighborly thing. Enter Kevin Bond, the lawyer we were assigned after discussing the situation briefly with a friendly and helpful secretary. Kevin took the information I gave him regarding the case and was able to pinpoint exactly what we needed to do to let her know we were ready to play hardball. While most of our exchanges with the ornery neighbor were made via email, he made each one hit hard. In no time the lady realized she couldn't manipulate us or the county any longer, and she forked out the cash to take care of the sewer break (as she should have when it was initially discovered 4 months prior). Without the patient guidance of Kevin Bond, we would have probably lost our minds dealing with the situation/individual. Even though the price we paid for his services was expensive, it was well worth the cost. The value of being done with the situation and coming out in front of the whole situation was inestimable. Thank you Kevin Bond, for your professionalism and assistance!

This firm law firm bullied our family, Jerry-juried the court, and threatened our family for a…read moreyear and a half while representing a contractor whose work we paid for using my wife's inheritance from her father. We hired the contractor during an extremely difficult stretch -- my daughter's senior year of high school and my mother's cancer treatment -- on a friend-of-a-friend referral. We weren't in a position to scrutinize every detail. There was no written contract, no permits, no termination date, no progressive payment schedule, and not a single change order the entire project. No one ever honestly disclosed they were going over budget. The original quote was $320,000 -- fully covered by my wife's inheritance. In the final two months, we asked in writing for a cost-to-complete figure and were told $146,000. We were then billed roughly double that, with no change in scope, no warning, nothing in writing, no permission. When we pushed back, their client sued us for $120,000 more. They are now suing us for $240,000. This firm's attorney was openly hostile throughout -- belittling my wife, questioning our integrity, and repeatedly calling us liars and con artists, all while representing a client who couldn't explain their own billing. When questioned in court, they put their office manager on the stand to justify the numbers. She admitted she had never been to the property, didn't know what work was being done or by whom, and simply passed along figures she was given without ever checking the budget. If you're evaluating this firm: a client with no contract, no permits, no change orders, and no willingness to explain their own numbers -- backed by a legal team that comes out swinging and puts the burden of proof on you. If your contractor won't put things in writing, won't pull permits, or won't explain a bill, take it as a warning now. We wish someone had warned us. Ready to post, or a

I just used SD Evictions for the first time, as my real estate attorney recently retired. I have…read morebeen in the commercial real estate business for over 35 years and self-manage a number of local properties. I was extremely impressed by the efficient process, the clear and concise communications, the quality of the recommendations, and the level of professionalism from SD Evictions. Rachael and her entire team were a pleasure to work with in a difficult situation. We had to go through a process with the SDHC, and SD Evictions gave great guidance, and the outcome was positive. I also appreciate their straightforward pricing; you know what it is going to cost up front. They also adjusted their billing to accommodate a change in the strategy, their communication and response time was incredible, I once got a response at 10 pm in the evening to a question I had. So, if you need a good eviction attorney to figure out this confusing process, it is great to have SD Evictions in your corner.

UPDATE: After posting my review, I received an email from Rachael personally attacking me and…read moresaying that I should be "embarrassed and ashamed." She also claimed that I authorized a service I "could not afford." To be clear, my ability to pay was never the issue. The issue is that I dispute the $799 invoice, I never signed an agreement authorizing that amount, and I was unable to speak with a supervisor or manager despite requesting to do so. I even offered $350 in good faith for the time they spent, but instead of receiving a professional response, I received personal insults and intimidating comments about facing "consequences." This review describes my own documented experience. I have preserved the emails and communications supporting everything stated here. Potential customers can review this information and form their own opinion about how this company handles billing disputes.

Working with Hoffman & Forde -- specifically Mike Dicks -- was one of the most frustrating…read moreprofessional experiences I've ever had. My sister and I hired the firm to represent us in a construction defect case involving our home. At first, our case was assigned to a junior attorney. When that attorney left the firm, Mike Dicks took over. From that point on, the entire process became far more stressful and chaotic than it needed to be. Instead of feeling like our attorney was advocating for us, it constantly felt like we were being pressured, dismissed, or talked down to. Any time we asked questions or pushed back on changes, we were treated as if we were the problem. One of the most maddening patterns was being told that parts of the settlement agreement were "final." We were repeatedly told we could not make further changes. Then the defense would make additional changes anyway, and suddenly those changes were allowed. When we asked questions about those changes, we were told we were jeopardizing the deal. This happened over and over again and created constant confusion about what was actually finalized and what wasn't. Another major issue was the lack of attention to detail. We provided extensive documentation of the problems with our house, including photos and written descriptions. Despite that, several critical issues were not properly addressed in the settlement scope. My sister repeatedly had to review and redline documents herself just to correct errors or omissions that should have been caught by our attorney. A perfect example involves two large floor-to-ceiling windows. Multiple experts who walked through the house suspected those windows were leaking, but we did not yet have clear documentation of water intrusion. Then, right around the time we were being pushed to sign earlier versions of the settlement agreement, a storm came through. During that storm my sister was able to record water visibly running down the inside of one of the windows. Despite that evidence, those windows were still not included in the final settlement scope, even though they were clearly part of the water intrusion issues affecting the property. The office also seemed extremely disorganized. We were asked multiple times for documents we had already provided. Outdated versions of the settlement agreement were circulated and referred to as the final version. At times it genuinely felt like no one was carefully reviewing the documents being sent to us. We were also repeatedly told the defendants were essentially insolvent and that we needed to accept the settlement because there was no money to pursue. When we asked how that determination had been made, the only documentation referenced was a financial disclosure sheet completed by the defendant himself listing limited assets. We were never informed if the actual business's financial records had been reviewed. Throughout all of this, the firm's partner, Daniel Forde, was copied on many of the communications but never stepped in to address the obvious problems. To be clear, the construction work that is now being completed at the property has addressed many of the defects. In fact, the damage turned out to be so extensive that the contractors ultimately ended up doing far more work than what was originally contemplated in the settlement. But that outcome came despite the legal representation, not because of it. What should have been professional legal guidance instead turned into months of unnecessary stress, confusion, and frustration. Far too often it felt like we were the ones doing the detailed review work while also paying legal fees. If you are considering hiring Hoffman & Forde, I strongly recommend asking very direct questions about who will actually handle your case and how closely documents will be reviewed before anything is finalized. Our experience with Mike Dicks was chaotic, exhausting, and deeply disappointing.

We hired Hoffman & Forde to represent us in a construction defect case involving our home…read more Initially, we were assigned a junior attorney. After that attorney left the firm, the senior attorney on the case, Mike Dicks, took over. From that point forward, the experience deteriorated significantly. My sister and I genuinely dreaded seeing Mike's name appear in our inbox. Interactions with him were consistently stressful, confusing, and unproductive. Instead of feeling like our attorney was advocating for us, we often felt pressured, dismissed, or talked down to. One of the biggest problems was communication and consistency. Mike frequently declared things "final" instead of asking for our input. Later, the defense would make additional changes and those changes would suddenly be allowed. When we asked questions or pushed back, we were told we were jeopardizing the deal or creating problems. This happened repeatedly and made an already stressful legal process even more frustrating. Another major issue was the lack of attention to detail and organization. Despite providing extensive documentation and photos of the defects in our home, several important items were not properly addressed in the settlement scope. We repeatedly had to review and redline documents ourselves to correct errors or omissions that should have been caught by our attorney. At one point, outdated versions of the settlement agreement kept being circulated and referred to as the final version. Despite raising concerns, the version that ultimately ended up executed still reflected earlier drafts that had known issues. In addition, two large floor-to-ceiling windows that we had documented leaking with video evidence were not included in the settlement scope. Repairing those windows could cost tens of thousands of dollars out of pocket, despite being verbally agreed upon during mediation. Another troubling issue involved the claim that the defendants were essentially insolvent. When we asked how that conclusion was reached, we were told that the defense provided a financial disclosure sheet completed by the defendant himself listing a house owned by his wife. Despite the defendant owning a construction business, our attorneys did not obtain the financial records or tax returns of the business owned by the defendant. That left us with serious questions about how the insolvency conclusion was reached. The office also appeared extremely disorganized. We were asked multiple times for documents we had already provided, including basic tax information, and there were frequent email exchanges correcting mistakes or clarifying issues that should have been handled internally. What made the experience especially concerning was that the firm's partner, Daniel Forde, was copied on many of these communications but never stepped in to address the issues. To be clear, the construction work that is now being completed at our house has ultimately addressed many of the defects. In fact, because the damage to the house turned out to be more extensive than anticipated, the defendants ended up doing significantly more work than what was originally contemplated in the settlement. That is one of the few silver linings in an otherwise extremely frustrating process. However, the legal representation itself was disappointing. We expected an attorney who would carefully review documents, communicate clearly, and advocate for our interests. Instead, we often felt like we were the ones doing the detailed review work ourselves while also paying for legal services. If you are considering hiring Hoffman & Forde, I would strongly encourage you to ask detailed questions about who will actually handle your case and how closely documents and settlement terms will be reviewed before anything is finalized. Our experience with Mike Dicks was disorganized, stressful, and far below the level of professionalism we expected when hiring legal counsel.

Angela and the entire team at Lokk Legal / Khashayar Law Group helped us survive one of the most…read morestressful and painful experiences of our lives -- and not only get through it, but come out on top. From the very beginning, they treated us with genuine kindness, compassion, and respect. They were patient with our questions, steady when we felt overwhelmed, and consistently made us feel like we were in capable hands. What sets this firm apart is the combination of professionalism and humanity. They were incredibly organized, detail-oriented, and strategic, but also gracious and supportive through every step of the process. Communication was excellent -- we were never left wondering what was happening or what the next step would be. They kept us informed, prepared, and grounded throughout a process that can feel completely consuming. Gianna is an absolute delight to work with and was such a calming presence during trial. She helped keep us sane, answered questions quickly, and made sure we always felt supported. The entire team was responsive, thorough, and truly invested in the outcome. Angela and Daryoosh are the dream team. Their skill, confidence, and courtroom presence were exceptional, and we will forever be grateful for the way they fought for us. They were relentless in the best way -- prepared, sharp, and committed to protecting our interests at every turn. If you are looking for a law firm that is both highly competent and deeply compassionate -- a team that will take your case seriously and stand by you like it matters -- we cannot recommend Lokk Legal / Khashayar Law Group strongly enough. We are forever indebted to them.

My experience over the years with CNS has been alright, companies I've worked for used there…read moreservices over the years. I started my own business did reach with the varies company handing Construction Industry paperwork needs, decided to use CNS. David Fink has been extremely helpful, attentive, friendly, has made the whole process much easier for me using the various services they offer. You can tell new management is in place they are now more focused on customer service, support, satisfaction, pricing is reasonable. No subscription fees need to join. Happy I made the choice to use them over other competitors. Juliann Foley- Business Owner Credit Division, LLC

We needed to ask someone to move out of our residence. I tried my best to do an onine form for the…read moreeviction but was told it was not a legal form. Sent the right form and served notice. The person removed themselves before the 60 day notice expired. It was painless and although I had to pay, Daniel Marshall's office was efficient and did follow-up to make sure everything went well and there was no need to remove the individual with a lawsuit. It was worth it. The amount we offered for the person to leave was the same amount it cost to have the person legally removed. Lesson learned.

Daniel Marshall helped us successfully navigate a difficult eviction from start to finish. He was…read moreknowledgeable, responsive, and clearly experienced with the eviction process. He successfully obtained the judgment and Writ of Possession, and we ultimately regained possession of the property. I would highly recommend Daniel to other San Diego landlords dealing with an eviction.

I was need in employment law assistance and reached out to the Greenfield team on their website. I…read morequickly heard back within 24 hours from Andrew that my type of needed was not something he specializes in but offered a referral. I appreciate his prompt response and referral nonetheless!

Andrew's a pleasure to work with - no runaround, no games. He tells you exactly where things stand…read moreand makes sure you're taken care of. Highly recommend.