I had a relatively complicated issue with some property in Phoenix that I needed advice on how to…read morehandle. I scheduled the initial consultation with Blake Bracht and he walked me through the issues, gave me great advice, and answered all of my questions, all within the initial 30 minute consultation window. He did not try to sell me any services that I didn't need and was very professional. I would highly recommend Platt and Westby and specifically, Blake to anyone needing legal assistance. If I should need any legal help in the future, I will certainly turn to them

My initial conversation with Mr. Westby gave me hope and optimism to resolve my situation. However,…read moremy case was handed off to Abelardo "Abe" Rodriguez who's no longer there. But during the time he was working on my case, it was impossible to get a hold of him and when he would finally call he would answer in circles without giving me a real answer. It was extremely frustrating, waste of time and money to say the least! I ended up having to seek help from other legal sources which cost even more money. A year later after everything was resolved on my own, I still had to finish paying the rest of the balance at Platt & Wesby for literally nothing! I would not recommend them.

The Attorney was competent, realistic and helpful. She offered viable, well thought out solutions…read more Overall, the process was user friendly.

I can highly recommend! Sydney Plaskett handled my Real Estate issues swiftly and diligently at a…read morelow cost. Support women owned businesses!!!

Last year, I was desperately trying to find legal guidance regarding significant damage done to our…read morehome in 2023 and continuing into 2024. The statute of limitations was about to expire, and I felt that I was running out of time. I had called everywhere and tried every avenue I could think of before I was finally referred to David Degnan. I am extremely grateful that I found him. I scheduled a free 15-minute consultation with David, but once he understood the extent of the damage and the urgency of the situation, he continued speaking with me for nearly 45 minutes. He was never in a hurry, never made me feel rushed, and did not charge me for the additional time. He listened carefully, treated me with respect, and offered meaningful guidance at a time when I felt overwhelmed and unsure of what to do next. Rather than encouraging me to spend money unnecessarily, David gave me practical advice and helped me understand how I could move forward on my own at that stage. He also told me that if I needed him later in the process, he would be happy to represent me. That meant a great deal to me because I felt he was genuinely looking out for my best interests rather than simply trying to obtain a paying client. I ultimately filed the case myself, using much of the advice he generously provided, and the matter is now moving forward. What stood out to me most was not only his knowledge, but also his kindness, patience, and genuine concern. As a senior citizen dealing with a stressful and complicated situation, I felt respected, heard, and valued. David is a caring and compassionate attorney, and I will always appreciate the time, guidance, and reassurance he gave me when I truly needed it.

I had a complicated issue related to hard money lending tied to real estate the I was able to get…read moreresolved through Degnan Law. Not only was he helpful in providing some options / path forward for my situation, but he offered a lot of good advice and ultimately a referral to someone that specialized in what I needed. Would highly use him again for anything legal related in the future.

Highly recommend. Fabian Zazueta and his team were so helpful and assisted me with a tricky real…read moreestate matter and yielded a very positive outcome for me. Easy to keep in touch with and very knowledgeable team! Fabian and Mark were amazing to work with!

Like every other contact I've made so far, I couldn't be helped by this firm with my particular…read morecase, but ulike almost everyone else, at least they contacted me and had a few suggestions.

Choosing Kadish was effectively like me paying to add another member to the opposing party's…read morecounsel. He failed to negotiate into the real and personal property settlement the one thing I asked for; all while telling me that I should capitulate to every one of the opposing party's demands. The consequence of his "negotiating" cost me tens of thousands of dollars. If you want a skilled lawyer that actually knows how to negotiate and will put your interests above the opposing party then find someone else. Don't choose a guy that has the energy of someone about to retire.

In my experience, Eugene 'Gene' Kadish provides practically flawless services. He usually responds…read moreinstantly. Even if he is on a call, he will send a message to let me know. Then he gets the work done so quickly, it seems like practically right away. The quality of the work that he has done for me has always been excellent. Thank you so much Gene. Thank you.

Niño Abate helped me when I had no hope for my situación! He carried out my case with grace and I…read morecan't be more grateful for his excellent help! Nino is so thoughtful and I appreciate him! So if you need help I totally recommend him!

Called on a Monday to schedule an appointment and we were directed to an online scheduling system…read more The openings were for in the afternoon - we paid $150 for a 30 min consultation and received confirmation via email. We never received a call or cancellation. We emailed the lawyer and finally got a response saying he/she was sick. We requested a cancellation and refund and never got a response. Very unprofessional. If you are sick you should turn off or block your calendar vs. taking customers money.

Stephanie came on in the middle of our Immigration case, and was wonderful. She continued our case…read morefor us as if she had started it. It was a long process, but she was always there and up front with us. She is very professional and knowledgeable in her field. And is very compassionate as well. I would highly recommend her to anyone dealing with immigration issues.

I very rarely write a review on Yelp. However, I cannot thank Steve enough for his kindness and…read morecompassion this morning. I am trying to help my son with an IRS audit. The amount in question is too small for anyone to want to help us with, but Steve took 9 minutes out of his life to speak with me and offer some very good advise. He did not ask me for anything other than my first name. I know if we need any help in the future or anyone I know needs a good tax attorney, this is the only place I would consider. Finding people who step back from their work to just be decent humans is hard. Finding people who actually offer help, without demanding payment, is almost impossible. THIS is a quality company. Thank you!!

Absolutely AMAZING firm! Stephen Boulton took on my IRS case over a year ago and from the moment we…read moremet I've never felt so confident and comfortable with an attorney. He is very knowledgeable and professional in tax law, and was great at communicating with me during this process. After a year of working with Stephen I now have that monkey off my back! Can't thank you and Deb enough for all that you do!! Your firm has just gained a lifelong customer as I wouldn't go anywhere else from this point forward. I HIGHLY recommend Denny & Boulton for ANY of your tax needs. Thank you again!!

Update: Mr Donovan as my mother-in-law's attorney talked her into creating trusts after my…read morefather-in-law passed away: more fees for Snell & Wilmer. My in-laws have one grandchild, my son. So now, if I need money for things like private school tuition, summer camp, etc for their only grandchild, I have to consult my mother-in-law who is in her late 80ties and lives in assisted living and my husband's brother who is middle aged, never married, no children and both MIL and BIL live in Phoenix while we live in Washington DC. Needless to say, this arrangement has done little for family harmony and created conflict which did not exist previously. Imagine having to consult your mother-in-law and brother-in-law who live 3000 miles away for things like school tuition... if you can even get them on the phone.

This review is Brian Burt who helped us with the sale of our small business. It was our first time…read moreselling a business and Brian helped walk us through the entire process. Brian is an excellent lawyer who is actively engaged with the BBB. The free monthly event series he puts on is also excellent. If you own a new or growing business highly recommend you sign up for some Emerging Business seminars.

This is THE firm to use for Estate Planning. I've been working with them for over a year now and…read moresimply couldn't be any more impressed! Unbelievable team, unbelievable commitment, and unbelievably knowledgeable! I highly recommend them!

I was the defendant in an eviction action. Tiffany and Bosco were the attys for the plaintiff. The…read moreManaging Partner on this case claimed to have mailed a 30 day notice to my home address, via certified mail. According to USPS tracking info, obtained by me and never presented by Tiffany & Bosco, I supposedly received 3 different types of notices before the letter was returned undeliverable. When in reality, the first notice I received was a 5 day forcible detainer action. I received it, signed for it, and appeared at the hearing. The commissioner assigned to my case had been newly appointed to the bench for less than six months. He stated on the record that he needed to look up the law as we presented our arguments. He relied heavily on the attorneys' representations regarding the law and only looked up the statutes cited by them, and none of the laws I cited. I believe the attorneys took advantage of his lack of experience. The plaintiff never presented the USPS tracking history to the court. I obtained the tracking number myself and tracked the mailing. The plaintiff also never presented the returned mail or envelope as evidence. Instead, the attorney presented only a photograph showing the preparation of the certified-mail piece. There was no tracking history, no returned mail, and no other evidence establishing that the alleged 30-day notice was actually mailed and received as represented. I repeatedly pointed this out to the commissioner. At my pleadings stating they have to have returned mail, something proving it actually was mailed to my address, the atty, in almost a whisper stated to the judge, " oh, we received return mail on Oct.....But still did not present it to the court. Again the judge relying on the word of the atty instead of proof. The case was filed in Superior Court rather than the Justice Court where eviction actions are normally initiated. I had legitimate ownership-related claims that I was attempting to raise, (which I believe the attys had forknowledge of and why they brought it in Superior court and not justice court.) and I asked that those claims be heard in the proper forum. That request was denied. I later received the firm's detailed billing ledger as part of the judgment against me. That ledger raised serious questions. It showed billing for a draft of the 30-day notice, but I could find no subsequent billing for a final notice, no charge for certified postage, and no charge for a paralegal supposedly taking the letter to the post office at approximately 8:30 p.m. The ledger contained charges for matters far less significant than these. Yet the court had been shown a photograph of what appeared to be a certified-mail receipt. In my view, the absence of those charges was highly significant. I contend that the evidence presented to the court did not establish that the 30-day notice had actually been mailed in the manner represented. I believe the attorneys relied on the presumption of service associated with the 5-day process to obtain a judgment without first establishing that the required 30-day notice had properly been sent. I had lived in my home for 17 years. I had no attorney because I could not afford one, so I represented myself while trying to learn the law and appellate procedures. During this ordeal, I was dealing with serious and worsening kidney disease. I spent months filing appeals, motions, and other pleadings and trying to meet court deadlines while struggling physically and financially. Denied my 30 to fight and properly present my case, I was sent into a tail spin to try to save my home on a 5day forcible detainer. I fought for approximately six months. Even the sheriff gave me additional time after I explained my circumstances. Ultimately, I lost my home of 17 years. I was eventually forced to abandon my appeal because I could no longer keep up with the legal requirements, and once I was removed from the property, the appeal could no longer provide the practical relief I needed. I believe I was denied due process because the required 30-day notice was never properly established/ or sent. I am now seeking legal counsel to determine what claims may be appropriate concerning the conduct of the attorneys involved and the evidence presented to the court. What stands out most to me is that the detailed billing ledger became the very document that raised questions about the attorneys' version of events. In my opinion, they were not nearly as careful with that ledger as they were with the evidence presented regarding the alleged 30-day notice. I am sharing my experience because I believe an attorney's reputation does not automatically make every representation to a court accurate. In this case, a 59-year-old pro se defendant believes she uncovered serious inconsistencies--and those inconsistencies ultimately cost her the home she had lived in for 17 years.