First I have to say these guys are very rude. I paid them a couple thousand dollars they said for…read morethat they would do a report and help me file my on file taxes well when I sent on my taxes they found some mistakes than they wanted to charge me $1200 a year and the report that they did... What's the tell me that I had on unfiled taxes. They are very difficult to get a hold of I've left multiple messages with days going by before someone gets back to me. They've literally done nothing for me except tell me that I have on file taxes in for that they charge me $2000. They claim to be a Christian-based organization I'm sure they're using this just to earn trust steer clear and find someone that has good reviews these guys are charlatans.

Matt and his firm are awesome saved thousands of dollars in back taxes. He actually communicated…read moreand returned calls. I highly recommend Matt.

Jeff and Marna are a dream team! They have helped many clients of mine successfully navigate the…read morecomplicated world of 1031 exchange. I won't send my people anywhere else. 12 out of 10 stars.

From the owner: CPEC1031 - Commercial Partners Exchange Company, LLC is dedicated to helping owners of businesses…read moreand investment property defer their capital gains taxes on sale of property under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

I found Sherayzen International Law Firm online solely based on online reviews. The reviews defined…read moreMr. Eugene Sherayzen as knowleagible, professional, trustworthy and reputable International tax lawyer. I hereby attest that the reviews are 100% accurate and he is indeed a very competent international tax attorney. I am a South African citizen who recently became a US citizen. I am an Electrical engineer by profession with little or no understanding of Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and FBARs. I, in error or lack of information thereof, failed to file FBAR and report foreign accounts in previous years. My predicament was brought to my attention when I received a W-9 form from my South African bank, asking for a declaration of my tax residency. I contacted Sherayzen law office for help. At the very first interview, Attorney Eugene Sherayzen asked probing questions to assess my case and my understanding of FATCA/FBARs. He reduced my anxiety by plotting the right path forward and explaining applicable fees and penalties. He completed all what was needed to resolve the case in a timely manner and at a very reasonable fee. This attorney is not money hungry and his only passion is to assist citizens with foreign accounts and assets to be compliant with the US tax law. I would definitely recommend Mr. Sherayzen to anyone seeking help with international and domestic tax matters. Thank you Humphrey

I called requesting a consultation because I was wrong about the type of lawyers they were and…read moreinstead of informing me that I was calling the wrong type of lawyers they sent an internal email and they included me and it's stating "don't call this nut" and I have email screenshots to prove it

This was, hands down, the worst experience I've ever had with legal representation. I trusted Mary…read moreto handle my case, but there was almost no communication. Emails were barely answered, and I was left in the dark most of the time. To make matters worse, I was charged $10,000 for just one court appearance--with no clear explanation or justification. It's incredibly disheartening to feel like you've invested so much money and hope, only to be met with silence and poor results. I genuinely wish there were more accountability when a case is lost, especially at this cost. I wouldn't recommend this firm to anyone--not even my worst enemy

After several consultations with other lawyers around the Twin Cities I chose Mr. Patterson. I will…read moretell you, it was one of the best decisions that I could've made. He offered me a fair price and allowed me to make payments. More important he got the results that we want. He was always more prepared than the opposing attorney. He was aggressive in court and commanded the respect of the judge. I definitely recommend him!

I was the opposing party in a Dakota County family-court matter in which Clarence Patterson III…read morerepresented the other side. He never represented me. This review concerns my direct experience with his courtroom advocacy and written positions. I understand that attorneys must advocate firmly for their clients. But in family court, words can alter a person's life before disputed facts are fully examined. At an August 28, 2025 hearing, the transcript records Mr. Patterson saying that I "love to talk about guns," that my "relationship with guns is concerning," warning that people could be "caught in the crossfire," and later portraying me as someone who "needs a gun to solve his problems." I stated on the record that I hated guns, had never owned one, and would never have one. I found it profoundly disturbing to be portrayed through repeated gun-related language when I was expressly denying any interest in owning a firearm. The same transcript records Mr. Patterson referring to "his bipolar disorder" while denying my concern that mental-health labeling was being used against me. I experienced the combined gun and mental-health framing as stigmatizing and dehumanizing--an effort to turn disputed allegations into a frightening portrait of an armed and mentally unstable person. A separate and extremely serious discrepancy involved Dakota County Crisis. A sworn filing in the case stated that a crisis-team member had contacted counsel and that the entire office had been alerted about me. A Dakota County Crisis supervisor later wrote that she had searched the system and consulted with colleague supervisors, found no record or recollection of such an alert, found no documentation of a duty-to-warn event, and stated that the team does not communicate directly with attorneys. In my view, a discrepancy involving a claimed government warning was too consequential to be left unresolved. It deserved a prompt, transparent, and documented explanation. Mr. Patterson also asked the court not to consider approximately fifty exhibits because he said he had not received them. I am not claiming in this review that the service objection itself constituted misconduct. I am describing the consequence as I experienced it: severe allegations were presented while a substantial body of my responsive evidence was not considered at that hearing. The matter ultimately resolved by stipulation before the scheduled evidentiary hearing. The most severe characterizations were therefore not adjudicated through that scheduled hearing. The litigation nevertheless caused profound personal, financial, and reputational harm. I found Mr. Patterson's approach unnecessarily escalatory, stigmatizing, and damaging. I would not recommend him. Strong advocacy does not require turning another human being into a caricature of mental illness and violence. Family-law attorneys exercise enormous power, and that power should be matched by factual precision, restraint, professional judgment, and accountability.