Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Treeside Charter School

    3.3 (3 reviews)
    Closed Closed

    Treeside Charter School Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Treeside Charter School

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    5 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 3
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Treeside Charter School

    Verify this business for free

    Get access to customer & competitor insights.

    Verify this business

    Provo Canyon School

    Provo Canyon School

    2.0(54 reviews)
    2.2 mi

    Great video Reckless Ben. Way to expose the school! I rly liked the part where the kid got solitary…read moreconfinement for stealing a bag of chips

    Based on public records and detailed reviews from 2024 through 2026, recurring complaints describe…read moreresidents being left unsafe around peer violence and inappropriate touching; punitive "stabilization," isolation, restricted communication, and restraints; medication problems or delayed medical care; unsanitary conditions and poor food; limited meaningful therapy, education, recreation, or discharge planning; invasive searches and inadequate privacy; and staff mockery, retaliation, or inaccurate incident reporting. Reviewers also repeatedly say advertised amenities such as the pool, ropes courses, and climbing walls were unavailable. A minority of reviewers praised individual clinicians or said the program helped them, but that does not erase the consistency of the adverse accounts or their overlap with independent regulatory findings. One of the most disturbing items is an official Provo Canyon School article published June 30, 2026. It presented a 7-to-14-day communication "blackout" as beneficial, explaining that direct parent-child contact would be paused so teens would be forced to rely on staff and peers rather than call home to vent or "ask to be rescued." The article also warned parents that children might beg to leave and characterized reduced defiance and acceptance of the environment as progress. Because it referred to "many facilities," the article alone does not prove PCS imposed this policy on every resident. It does show the school endorsing a structure that removes a newly admitted child's independent family-reporting channel and primes parents to discount a genuine plea for help. Utah Code 26B-2-123 requires weekly confidential family communication, while the current licensing rule requires individualized documentation and written approval for modifications and says a blanket practice cannot satisfy that requirement. A true 14-day blackout, or any restriction that eliminated weekly confidential contact, would conflict unless an approved exception applied. The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry warns against withholding family contact, and a 2024 Senate investigation of Universal Health Services and other operators found that residential treatment facilities often cut children off by limiting family communication and documented both staff-on-youth and youth-on-youth sexual abuse. This does not prove the PCS article caused any specific abuse, but it explains why this kind of isolation can make physical or sexual abuse harder to report and detect. These concerns are reinforced by Utah's 2026 findings. After a resident was assaulted, knocked unconscious, and left with life-threatening head injuries, regulators found that PCS had failed to act on documented threats and transfer requests, failed to protect the child, and delayed emergency care by arranging non-medical transportation instead of calling 911. Utah later revoked both campus licenses, citing chronic noncompliance that included failures to protect children from violence, unsafe restraint and behavior-management practices, abuse and mistreatment, inducing pain for compliance, punishment intended to frighten or humiliate, deprivation of water, rest, or toileting, retaliation for reporting rights violations, and failures involving staffing, background checks, medical care, sanitation, and incident reporting. These were regulatory findings, not merely social-media allegations, and they are difficult to reconcile with the school's marketing of close supervision, medication management, intensive therapy, education, and recreation. The operator disputes the revocations and has appealed, but I would not consider placement here unless the documented failures are resolved through transparent, independent, and sustained compliance.

    Photos
    Provo Canyon School

    See all

    Treeside Charter School - elementaryschools - Updated August 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...