Two months ago I started filling out my divorce paperwork - determined that I was capable and…read moreintelligent enough to figure it out and do it on my own. I purchased the online program, clicked all the buttons and spent hours upon hours trying to figure everything out. Once my paperwork was returned to me (the second time), I realized it was time to finally ask for professional help. I am so grateful that Rosario came into my life - not only did she sit down and help me figure out where I went wrong, she did it with complete understanding of my personal situation, she did it with caring and she did it with professionalism. Thank you Rosario, I am so grateful to you - you are a amazing!

I am a local attorney, and have sent many cases outside of my area of practice to the Rosario Law…read moreFirm. I have heard nothing but praise and thanks from the referrals, and will continue to send clients there.

If I could give them 0 stars or negative stars I would. I had a horrible experience with this firm…read moreand attorney Ralph Habib. I truly felt that Mr. Habib did not spend enough time on my case and just took the first offer the District Attorney gave him. While I did get a reduction, I still got 2 points for driving 45 mph in 30 mph area. Mr. Habib convinced me that this was the best offer that I was going to get. While this ended up being a nominal fee ($243) on top of the attorney fees ($300), because of the points, it ended up costing me thousands of dollars on my car insurance rates. I read the great reviews of Yelp and picked this firm since I am all the way in California. But I should have done more research. I just thought that since this was such an easy case any attorney should be able to take care of it. Apparently not. Please shop around or if you can, fight the case yourself. I have had much better success going that route in the past. These attorneys will do the minimal amount of work to justify their rates. It's just a numbers game to them. Service as many clients as they can. Stay away.

Easy to work with and best price in town! They kept me in the loop at all times. It's important if…read moreyou have any questions or concerns to know they have your back and make themselves available to put you at ease. Thank you!

Total rip off!!! Expensive, did not follow through on what she said she was going to do and…read morecrushed my case. Stay away from this scam of a woman at all cost.

Today is 9/1/22 If I could give this women a 0 star rating I would. The MOST UNPROFESSIONAL LAWYER,…read moreI'm not sure how she's still in business. My family hired Haddad for a family case and she represented us for 4 weeks and with poor to nonexistent communication until we fired her. She is rude, very disrespectful and will forget important facts to your case. She has ongoing personal issues that supersed your case please save yourself the $2,500 retainer and go else where. Pathetic!!

Cerio Law Offices represented us with the purchase of our home. It was a great experience. We are…read morenew to the Syracuse area and everyone in the office made us feel welcome. Our concerns were their first priority and they gave sound and useful advice. We continue to use their services for other legal matters. We highly recommend them.

Cerio Law Offices has been there for my family through deaths, family court proceedings, and other…read morelegal matters. They have never done harm or steered us in the wrong direction. The whole office is very professional and I would recommend them for any legal matters you may have.

This attorney is suspended for Malpractice- (script from…read more https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-fourth-department/2019/2019-ny-slip-op-00806.html We find respondent guilty of professional misconduct and conclude that he has violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0): rule 1.3 (a)--failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; rule 1.3 (b)--neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him; rule 1.5 (d) (5) (ii)--entering into an arrangement for, charging or collecting a fee in a domestic relations matter without a written retainer agreement signed by respondent and the client setting forth in plain language the nature of the relationship and the details of the fee arrangement; rule 8.4 (b)--engaging in illegal conduct that adversely reflects on his honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer; rule 8.4 (c)--engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; rule 8.4 (d)--engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; and rule 8.4 (h)--engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer. We also conclude that respondent has violated 22 NYCRR 1400.3 by failing to execute a written retainer agreement in a domestic relations matter that provides for, inter alia, itemized billing statements to be sent to the client at least every 60 days. In determining an appropriate sanction, we have considered respondent's submissions in mitigation, including his statement that he has reduced his case load and has hired a legal secretary to assist with law office scheduling, billing, and communications with clients. We have also considered, however, certain factors in aggravation of the misconduct, including that charge one arises from a lengthy course of conduct intended to deceive a tribunal and that charge two concerns respondent's severe neglect of a client matter that resulted in substantial harm to the client. Accordingly, after consideration of all of the factors in this matter, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until further order of the Court.

Terrible!!!! All he had to do was get me child support arrears and he couldn't even do that. He had…read moreno idea what he was doing !! Oh by the way it took him seven years To get to the court house . He kept rescheduling my case like I didn't need the support money. And give him copies of your paperwork !!!! Never an original. You will never get them back regardless of the hundreds of times that you beg them back from him! He should have been Barred!!!!! This attorney is suspended for Malpractice- (script from https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-fourth-department/2019/2019-ny-slip-op-00806.html We find respondent guilty of professional misconduct and conclude that he has violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0): rule 1.3 (a)--failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; rule 1.3 (b)--neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him; rule 1.5 (d) (5) (ii)--entering into an arrangement for, charging or collecting a fee in a domestic relations matter without a written retainer agreement signed by respondent and the client setting forth in plain language the nature of the relationship and the details of the fee arrangement; rule 8.4 (b)--engaging in illegal conduct that adversely reflects on his honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer; rule 8.4 (c)--engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; rule 8.4 (d)--engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; and rule 8.4 (h)--engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer. We also conclude that respondent has violated 22 NYCRR 1400.3 by failing to execute a written retainer agreement in a domestic relations matter that provides for, inter alia, itemized billing statements to be sent to the client at least every 60 days. In determining an appropriate sanction, we have considered respondent's submissions in mitigation, including his statement that he has reduced his case load and has hired a legal secretary to assist with law office scheduling, billing, and communications with clients. We have also considered, however, certain factors in aggravation of the misconduct, including that charge one arises from a lengthy course of conduct intended to deceive a tribunal and that charge two concerns respondent's severe neglect of a client matter that resulted in substantial harm to the client. Accordingly, after consideration of all of the factors in this matter, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until further order of the Court. Read less