Morris Wilson is the best firm to work with! I have had such a great experience working with Josh at the firm. I would highly recommend this firm to anyone looking for kind compassionate representation. read more

I hired Morris Wilson Knepp Jacquette, P.C. and worked with Joshua James Knepp--very disappointing experience. Communication was poor and I had to chase for basic updates. Billing and case strategy were unclear, which made things even more frustrating. For what you pay, this level of service is unacceptable. I would not use them again. read more

Morris Wilson Knepp Jacquette, PC - Business Law Near Me - Conshohocken, Pennsylvania

See all

Seth was recommended to me from an acquaintance after my first lawyer did nothing. I believed I had a medical negligence case against a doctor. I presented with pain in my hip that shot down my leg, already having a long medical history with the same leg. The doctors only looked at my hip, claimed I had arthritis, and this would be life. Would not supply medicine for pain and had me doing PT. After over a year of suffering, a second opinion quickly discovered my femur was fractured with one x-ray. The first lawyer I spoke to did not even waste his time with me. Seth took my call, listened, even admitting he was uncertain I had a case, but was willing to look at the documents. When he realized there might be a case, he took it on and steamed forward. As expected, it took several years to go through, but the end result was a very respectable settlement, even being able to apply a recently passed change to workers comp repayment. Seth took the time to explain details to me when we spoke, worked around my schedule, and gave me guidance where needed, yet never told me what to do. His guidance allowed me to direct this to a respectable end result. Looking back, my only 'issue', if you want to call it that, would be I did not feel I was getting updates unless I reached out, then I would get one. I would not hold this one issue against them, and would recommend them to anyone needing a lawyer. read more

I went to Seth Wilson and attorney with Morris and Clemm in Plymouth meeting, Pa. I was looking for representation due to an issue with a home inspector and potentially the agents involved with the sale of a house. I met with him in June 2011.and we discussed a complaint against the inspector and possibly agents and seller. I had inspection report from him and a subsequent one after purchasing the house, having relied on the initial inspector report. That report did not indicate the electrical hazardous issues in the house, among other problems not disclosed but found on the second inspection. The case, using the 2 reports, would have been an easy proving case for negligence. I did not hire Mr. Wilson at that time. He wrote me a follow up letter, dated June 16, 2011, 6 months still remaining on the one year statute at that time, verifying I had not hired him. He wrote that I should be aware there was a 2 year statute of limitations for consumer fraud. He made no mention of the one year statute that was still running/ that there was a separate statute for negligence on the part of a home inspector. (He never asked to see the contract which was boilerplate, citing the Pa. Real Estate Law 1 year statute against home inspectors for a complaint of negligence.) Since the one year was still active and he did not mention it I relied on his statement of 2 years. (The one year ended on Dec 10, 2011.) Having trouble with another lawyer I decided to hire Mr. Wilson. He was given a retainer of 4000.00$ on May 25, 2012, 5 1/2 months after the statute of limitations for negligence against the inspector had run. (But never mentioning it, evidently because of his lack of knowledge about the specific and main law under which he had taken my case and money.) He took the case and wrote a complaint for initiation of the lawsuit. It was only against the inspector and contained only 2 counts. 1) breach of contract and 2) Negligence. The Pa real estate law specifically states there is a one year statute of limitations against home inspectors for negligence. It is "black letter law" and not an issue of seeing the contract, which he never asked to see and then blamed me, in an email/letter for his not asking to see it.) I researched the law after I became aware he had lost me the statute. Since he included negligence in his complaint, and as he never mentioned it to me when the statute was still running, he was negligent and ignorant (unaware) of the Pa. real estate law. It is not on the client to do the research to know about the statute(s). That is why you retain a lawyer in the first place. When I sent him email stating he was responsible for my losing the one year statute, since I relied on his letter, he told me he absolutely was not at fault. He wrote that a case for fraud would be much harder to pursue and an almost impossible barrier, despite writing in the initial letter only about the statute for fraud. If it was such a hard case why then did he take my retainer when he knew, should have known, he only had the 2 year statute for fraud with which to work, and yet never claimed fraud? He did return my retainer, however the problem was he lost me my one year statute under which it would have been an easy case, based on the inspection reports. (The inspector said "romex" wiring not knob and tube. He then wrote to me in a letter it was "not visible" the day he was there. It was easily visible. The second inspector also found it to be hazardous and dangerous. 2 electricians agreed with that assessment.) I sued Mr. Wilson in small claims court. He was able to get it thrown out on a technicality. In the parking lot after I told him I thought he would have been a man and taken responsibility for losing the statute. He asked what I wanted then offered me $1500.00 with a 5 day deadline for acceptance. When I said I would take it he sent me a 'release" form that said he took responsibility for nothing, In exchange for his payment I was not to tell anyone about an offer being made, the release, the conditions of the release. Essentially that it never happened. I was also never to "disparage" him or I would be made to pay 10,000$ per incident. I refused and wrote him an email stating that if he took responsibility ,admitted he lost the statute, I would accept the 1500.00$. I would also sign a confidentiality agreement and non disparagement clause. His response was to not even bother to reply. This lawyer does not know the law for which he had been retained, lost me a major statute of limitations making any subsequent attempts at litigation against the inspector much harder and costlier. In addition he did not have the professionalism to step up to the plate and acknowledge what he had done. a (As well as not respond to the last 2 emails to him directly responding to his offer of the money and the releases well as request to respond.) read more

I've worked professionally with Morris Wilson PC on a number of cases. They are always a thorough and professional firm. They have delivered any and all information requested in a timely fashion. read more

This firm is professional and thorough and gives personal attention to each of its clients.

This lawyer is awesome I had a problem with my new landlord i called the office and he just advised me without any cost.need to have more lawyers like him out here in this sometime cruel world of ours. read more

This firm is wonderful and they help me alot. Also the whole staff is nice and they know what their doing. From A. Taylor one of their favorite clients. read more