One reviewer on GOOGLE gave him 1 star for telling her he was "too busy" to take her call -which I…read moreHIGHLY DOUBT ---- SO TACKY to take the time of her day to do such a thing. I have NO doubt that Shands would have NEVER EVER told anyone he was, "too busy" because of my 7+ years of knowing him and his professionalism. She missed out with her "quick-to-judge" attitude & hurt feelings because he does not employ a receptionist, or a paralegal to field calls. I will explain to you why this is awesome. And I never ever had difficulty with communication with Shands. He always took my call when he could, and always called me back promptly - even long after my case was over. So, In my opinion, Shands is best described like old school doctors when it comes to bedside manner; very professional, reserved, and compassionate. If you are looking for the best of the best when it comes to employment law, here you go. Shands handled my case about 6 years ago and of course he won it for me because Shands won't take a case unless he KNOWS he can win it. There are no paralegals to plead your hour long story to, only to miss important key details before getting turned down by the attorney. It's just Shands. You actually meet with him and he takes extremely detailed notes and asks tons of questions to help establish your case. I paid my retainer immediately after my meeting with him which was more than fair. Shands was and will always have been a blessing for me, and the validity and justice of my case. I love going back and reading his Prima Facie and the demand letters because they are powerful. I only accept the BEST in my life. I got turned down by a few firms who would not listen to me, and left out key details of my case. It was like I had won the lottery when Shands answered the phone, listened to me, and asked me to come see him. I spent hours and hours, and days researching attorneys before I found Shands. Do not question your judgment - Just hire him. Even if on the first call he is busy and has to call you back--You will be forever grateful. I am So thankful I did--even if I would have lost my case because I know he would have done everything to fight for me. https://www.wulbernlaw.com/

Highly Recommended!…read more This was the first time I found myself in a position where I needed to hire an employment attorney. I highly recommend Mr. Wulbern. He was very thoughtful and efficient and my matter was concluded in a fair and timely matter. Thank you Shands!

Kendra is a highly knowledgeable lawyer, with a high level of domain expertise in her field. Her…read moreresponse times are prompt and the advice is well thought through. Highly recommended!

Kendra was knowledgeable and able to explain the legal lingo in a way that was easy for me to…read moreunderstand! She was easy to get a hold of and answered any questions I had along the way promptly. She was also kind and patient through the immigration process, and made it seem less daunting! I highly recommend her!

all the interactions we had with staff were positive. we…read morehad an accident (not our fault). took 2 years, but it seemed much shorter1. I give them an A-

My initial contact with Morgan & Morgan was marked by attentive, professional, and truly…read moreoutstanding customer service. Because of the pain I am currently experiencing from my injuries, I had been reluctant to make the call; speaking for extended periods is difficult, and I had been avoiding phone conversations altogether. Taffney changed that experience entirely. She was courteous, patient, and exceptionally easy to talk to. She allowed me to take my time, never rushed me, and created a level of comfort that eased my pain to the point where I even found myself laughing. Her professionalism, genuine concern, and thorough approach made a meaningful difference during a very difficult moment. Based on this interaction, I feel confident moving forward and look forward to working with Morgan & Morgan as my case progresses.

I highly recommend this law firm. Great people to work with when it comes to social security.read more

ZERO STARS, NOT 1 star. I hired Mr Sacks back in 2016 to represent me in a lawsuit against my…read moreformer employer. If I could go back in time and do it all over again would I hire Mr Sacks? Absolutely not. The first time I spoke with Mr Sacks over the phone I obviously did not answer his question properly. About 2 minutes into the conversation when he asked me a question and I answered it he immediately started yelling at me. He told me that a judge and jury would never accept my answer. This struck me as very odd. I had been talking with Mr Sacks for the very first time for a total of maybe 2 minutes and already he was yelling at me as if I were supposed to know exactly what to say, what to do and how to act ? Wow. I will not tell you what you want to hear about Mr Sacks. I will tell you what you NEED to hear about Mr Sacks. I firmly believe that Mr Sacks had determined the outcome of my case long before the final day of mediation. Many of my questions went unanswered and Mr Sacks would simply say to me "trust me". BIG MISTAKE on my part when I did. The final day of mediation is when I realized that I was intentionally left in the dark by Mr Sacks as far as certain specific details of my case were concerned. The mediator was shocked at certain things that did or did not occur during the entire process and duration of my case. So was I. I feel as if the primary objective of Mr Sacks is to keep his client in the dark and to reveal as little information about important details of the case as possible. This will keep his client uninformed to a certain extent and will also allow Mr Sacks to have full control of the outcome of the case. Not to mention, this will also allow him to do so with little or no resistance from his client at all. If Mr Sacks sends his client to a gun fight armed with a butter knife then usually his client will be backed into a corner and forced to submit with little or no resistance at all. I also feel as if this was not Mr Sacks' first rodeo. The day before mediation Mr Sacks refused to answer specific and very important questions of mine as far as how mediation would actually take place and totally blew me off. Mr Sacks told me that " he had many other clients to deal with that day and would just see me in the morning at mediation." Unbelievable !! It seemed as if both Mr Sacks and opposing counsel were doing nothing more than trying to put on a show for everyone the entire time. Many times during depositions Mr Sacks would try to appear to be angry and would get loud and raise his voice at the opposing attorney that represented my former employer. It also seemed as if opposing counsel would "object to form" or object to many other irrelevant aspects of a question simply to disrupt the flow of the questioning that took place during depositions. As far as I was concerned it was nothing more than "posturing on steroids" that was mixed with nonstop blathering by opposing counsel with the objections that were being made every 20 seconds. Sometimes I felt as if I were watching a low budget reality tv show. It was ridiculous at times as far I was concerned and also a very weak attempt to mislead clients that were involved in the case as well as the mediator. The mediator also seemed to be aggravated with certain aspects of the case along with pertinent details that were conveniently left out or not addressed at all. I learned much more about my case from the mediator during the few unnecessary hours spent during mediation than I did the entire time I spent with Mr Sacks on my case. As I mentioned before, I feel as if the final outcome of my case had been decided behind closed doors and long before mediation even took place. During mediation is when I realized what might have actually taken place the entire time and also determined the final outcome of my case, or left me with an ultimatum as far as I was concerned. Due diligence is golden. Food for thought. John from Jacksonville, Fl

From the owner: We provide legal services where the client comes first. We also, however, do not tell a client…read morewhat they necessarily want to hear, but rather what they need to hear. At our office, the clients are treated as people, not just a number. The number one complaint about lawyers is that lawyers do not return phone calls. We return all phone calls within 24-48 hours. That separates us from almost all others.

My name Mr chance I was injured in November of 25 I chose Farha and Farha because I felt this law…read morefirm was the right fit for my situation the team was very professional and helpful any time I contacted My team they got back to me swiftly I highly recommended Farha and fahra for any future legal help they deserve more than a five they are a 10 plus

I must have spent 30 minutes, speaking to two reps at Farah and Farah, to see if they take my type…read moreof case. "Yessem" took a good 20 minutes asking questions in slow motion. What is your birthday? (Say that in 20 seconds). There was no way we could go at that speed and not take several hours, so I asked if he could mail me his questions and let me respond or if he could connect me to somebody else. He said no so I called back and the man who took my call asked questions for 10 minutes before finally saying they don't take my type of case. He said they don't say that up front because they want to refer you to other attorneys. This didn't feel legitimate. It feels like these people have posted an ad on the internet, pretending to be lawyers, when all they want to do is play childhood phone games.