Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Sandstone Law Group

    1.0 (1 review)
    Closed 8:00 am - 5:00 pm

    Services - Sandstone Law Group

    Health, injury and disability

    Sandstone Law Group Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Sandstone Law Group

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Photo of Ron G.
    0
    14
    0

    1 year ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Sandstone Law Group

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    Get access to customer & competitor insights.

    Verify this business

    Matt Fendon Law Group - The Attorneys at MFLG are your "rock" as you go through your serious struggles with your worker's comp case

    Matt Fendon Law Group

    (47 reviews)

    I am a retired AZ Highway Patrol Officer. During my career I was unfortunately involved in 3 major…read moreon duty accidents. I broke my neck, and severely injured my back and both shoulders. Matt Fendon Law Group aggressively fought for my rights as an injured employee. Not only did Megan Bornmann, my case attorney, fight for my rights, she was always willing to explain everything in layman's terms. I have a lot of experience with criminal law, but Worker's Comp laws are very complicated. Matt Fendon really cares about his clients. He even called me personally. Don't let the State intimidate you. I tried to be work with the State, but they made it clear they weren't there to help me. They were only interested in not having to pay for my injuries. I have recommended The Matt Fendon Law Group to others. It's a shame you must have an attorney to receive your total benefits when you are injured at work. My former Worker's Comp Attorney asked me to lie, and I fired him. I thank GOD for finding Matt Fendon Law Group. They have always been above the board. They have restored my faith in attorneys.

    Clearly you don't take it seriously, I sent by email to your intake:…read more Industry incident report number Doc notes and diagnosis Rejection letter from the Workers comp insurance company. I contacted your office , how many times?, and your secretary just kept asking for the same material. I got a little upset with her and asked why You haven't made a decision after 3 weeks of looking at my material. I hired some one else , and told her that, then you called me and left a message. After all this was done , and I put in a review that also explicitly says I hired someone else, you decide to take my case and email me. All the evidence is there, any good lawyer would stop harassing me and find a new receptionist. Stop contacting me anywhere. I want no more contact with you. Have a good day

    MayesTelles

    MayesTelles

    (55 reviews)

    I paid them my savings. I feel like an idiot. You will too…read moreif you hire them. Check the BBB and REAL reviews. Public defender would have done better and spent more time on the case. Mayes Telles and Chris Culbert leave a bad taste in my mouth.

    I retained Meyes Telles in early 2025 after being contacted about a potential unemployment-related…read moreinvestigation. I paid $6,782 up front based on the understanding that this would cover the investigative phase and early representation. During my consultation, the conversations repeatedly emphasized that my "future," "freedom," and "life" were at risk if I didn't retain the firm immediately. At the time I was scared and vulnerable, and looking back, the tone now feels unnecessarily alarm-driven given how my case ultimately resolved. Over the following months, very little seemed to happen on my case, but I was still charged recurring $500 "criminal investigation minimum" fees plus additional charges for brief emails and short calls on top of that. My understanding of a "minimum fee" was that it would apply only when less than that amount of work occurred, not as an extra charge added regardless of activity. The wording in the agreement felt unclear, and the way the fee was applied didn't feel consistent. When I requested a full accounting, the billing appeared fragmented across many tiny time entries in months where the minimum fee was also added. I asked for clarification and said clearly that I wanted to resolve my questions internally and amicably first. After one reply from the firm, my follow-up request went unanswered. When the matter finally became a formal case, I was then told I would need to pay an additional $15,000 for "pre-trial work," even though only one hearing was expected. This was never clearly disclosed at the beginning, and it felt like a sudden financial surprise at the worst possible moment. I had also previously been told that unused funds would roll forward if the case escalated -- but when I asked about that, the explanation changed completely. At that point I no longer felt comfortable remaining with the firm. I hired a new attorney for $3,500. Within one round of plea negotiations, we obtained a highly favorable resolution that removed all felony charges and resulted in a much better outcome than what I had been led to believe was realistic. My new counsel also expressed concern about how the early strategy and billing from my prior representation had been handled, and explained that my situation was actually fairly straightforward -- not the extreme, catastrophic scenario I was initially presented with. Based on my experience, I strongly recommend that anyone considering this firm ask very direct questions about: * what their "monthly minimum" fee actually means in practice * when and how large additional fees may be * whether funds truly roll forward if the case progresses * what realistic case outcomes look like before being told worst-case scenarios I left this experience feeling financially taken advantage of, misled about the severity of my situation, and ignored when I asked reasonable questions about billing. I would not use this firm again.

    Sandstone Law Group - disabilitylaw - Updated September 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...