1. Simasko Simasko & Simasko PC

    0

    Mount Clemens, MI

    Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Simasko Simasko & Simasko PC

    2.0 (1 review)

    Simasko Simasko & Simasko PC Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Simasko Simasko & Simasko PC

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    12 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    Get access to customer & competitor insights.

    Verify this business

    Finazzo Lori J

    Finazzo Lori J

    (7 reviews)

    Lori Finazzo is a fantastic lawyer. I had a complicated divorce case which I needed a strong top…read morenotch lawyer for. Lori and her team ensured I had a fair settlement. I was thoroughly satisfied and would highly recommend her.

    Formal Complaint Regarding Mediator Lori Fazzoni's Conduct and Lack of Neutrality During Mediation…read more I am submitting this complaint regarding my experience with mediator Lori Fazzoni during mediation in my divorce matter. My concern is not simply that mediation failed to produce a settlement. My concern is the manner in which the mediation was conducted and whether both parties' financial positions, arguments, and proposed settlement terms received fair and neutral consideration. Prior to mediation, I prepared and submitted a detailed settlement proposal addressing the division of property, retirement benefits, debt, custody issues, post-separation expenses, and other financial matters. During mediation, I did not feel my proposal received meaningful review or discussion. Several issues caused me significant concern. The mediator stated words to the effect of, "It's my show." I found this troubling in a process that I understood was supposed to remain neutral, balanced, and focused on helping both parties evaluate their respective positions. My premarital property argument was an important issue in the case, yet I do not recall receiving meaningful discussion or analysis of that issue during mediation. I also raised concerns regarding the other party's income, employment, bank activity, financial disclosures, and expenses. I did not feel those matters received the same level of scrutiny as my finances. A substantial amount of time appeared to focus on my banking activity, attorney fees, and financial history. I was also concerned about the treatment of retirement and pension issues. These assets represent a significant portion of the marital estate. I expected meaningful discussion regarding their treatment, valuation, and possible role in settlement. Another concern involved the exchange of mediation materials. I understood mediation summaries were expected three business days before mediation. Materials from the opposing side appeared to have been submitted later than that timeframe. I am concerned about whether both parties were held to the same procedural expectations. During the process, I did not feel there was a balanced examination of each party's income, property claims, debts, financial contributions, or settlement positions. I left mediation believing my evidence and concerns had not received equal consideration. I understand a mediator does not serve as an attorney for either party and does not decide the case. I also understand a mediator does not have to agree with my legal position. My complaint concerns the neutrality, balance, professionalism, and overall administration of the mediation process. I am requesting that the appropriate authority review the mediation, including the mediator's conduct, the handling of the parties' submissions, whether each party received a fair opportunity to present their position, and whether the process complied with applicable mediation standards and procedures. I am willing to provide supporting documents, mediation correspondence, settlement proposals, submission dates, emails, and other records relevant to this complaint. I am requesting a written response explaining the complaint review process and what action, if any, will be taken regarding these concerns.

    Switalski Law

    Switalski Law

    (4 reviews)

    Downtown Mount Clemens

    Worst experience I've ever had with an attorney. Jodi was extremely unprofessional, under prepared…read moreand we were humiliated in court. The judge did not show Jodi any respect in the one court date we had which she charged me over $4k. Diana was amazing unfortunately Jodi put me in terrible spot. She then threatened to sue me for a honest Google review that I left about my experience. Strongly do not recommend

    I cannot say enough about Jodi Switalski and her team at Switalski Law. From the very first phone…read morecall--on a Saturday morning--I felt heard, understood, and supported in a way I didn't think was possible in a legal setting. As a permanently disabled parent navigating a high-conflict divorce from a covert narcissist while raising my autistic son, I came into this feeling completely overwhelmed. But Jodi's unique background in law, psychology, and addiction made all the difference. She didn't just represent me--she got me. Jodi, along with Claire (who was a phenomenal law clerk at the time and is now an attorney) and Judy (her kind, organized assistant), stood by me through every mediation and legal battle. Even when I wanted to give up, they reminded me to breathe, to keep going, and to stay grounded in what mattered: protecting my son and staying true to myself. Even now, post-divorce, I know my fight isn't over--and I won't face it without them. Jodi is more than just an attorney. She's a warrior, a fierce advocate, and truly one of the most compassionate professionals I've ever met. If you're navigating a high-conflict case, especially involving children or hidden abuse, call Switalski Law. You won't just get a lawyer--you'll get a team who fights with heart.

    Simasko Simasko & Simasko PC - lawyers - Updated September 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...