Whatever Happened to Customer Service?
Six people reserve a table at Arturo's while 20 - 30 other invited guests wait in another reserved room of the restaurant for a private function. Over the course of dinner one of the six diners has an entire pitcher of water spilled over her shoulder and on to her lap. The guests shrug that incident off as somewhat humorous.
Another of the dining guests, who frequents Arturo's on a regular basis notices that her appetizer is not quite up to its usual standards, makes a comment to the other dining guests and lets the issue go. The same dining guest then receives a salad that is missing one of its key ingredients, again makes a comment to the other dining guests, but doesn't find it necessary to raise an issue with the server.
Three of the dining guests order identical meals and all three diners are not satisfied with the dish and choose not to finish their servings. No comments were made, in fact, there was no follow up from the wait staff to even inquire about the meals at all.
One other diner's meal was too over-cooked, but again opinions were kept to themselves. The other two diners were satisfied and enjoyed their meals.
As the diners neared completing their meals, the cook/co-owner of Arturo's made a point of visiting the table to see how everyone enjoyed their dinner. At first, it seemed like a kind gesture. Once he noticed that half of the meals were not consumed, he inquired if there was an issue with the meals. After several attempts by all of the diners to politely avoid expressing their true feelings about their dining experience, the cook/co-owner insisted on prodding for an answer as to why the meals were not eaten.
Finally, one of the diners spoke up and informed the cook/co-owner that the seafood within the dish was not fresh and somewhat distasteful. It was quite evident that something was not right with the meal, as all three diners with the same order had removed the seafood from their plates. Although this diner was expressing the issue with those particular dishes, he did also mention that he was quite happy with his own meal that was ordered.
Instead of considering, respecting or just going along with his customer's comments, the co-owner took offence, picked the seafood off of the plates of his guests, ate it in front of them and insisted that his (over)paying customers didn't know what they were talking about. When the commenting guest remarked that the seafood just wasn't fresh, the co-owner not so jokingly replied with, "Those are fighting words!"
The co-owner grabbed the plates, marched to his kitchen and doors were heard slamming and plates crashing. This was a man who opened himself up to comments and perhaps some criticism by addressing the table of guests and insisting to know why they were not eating their meals.
Based on this display of complete unprofessionalism, immaturity and an absolute lack of respect for not only this table of customers, but those at adjacent tables, it was quickly decided that perhaps dessert was not going to be an option on this evening.
But, it doesn't end here...
Awaiting their bills, the guest who commented on the dissatisfaction with the meals went outside for a smoke. The co-owner pursued him outside and verbally assaulted his guest, while he had two enlisted "thugs" stand nearby in case his attack on his customer escalated to anything further. The barrage of screaming from the amateurish business owner could be heard from inside the restaurant.
One would think that settling the bill and dropping the matter would close the book on this episode. One would think that, but it doesn't end here....
Against their better judgement, the six dining guests joined the other 20-30 invited guests in a privately booked room of this same restaurant. After all, this was an event that was several months in planning and a sullied cook shouldn't ruin an evening for so many people. The party could still go on by leaving the past events in the past.
Unfortunately, about fifteen minutes later, the incensed co-owner found it important enough to come and crash the private party and openly discuss with his business partner that, "He didn't want any of these people here." With an absurd display of substandard business ethic and perhaps a bruise on his cooking pride, he felt the wise decision to make at that moment was to p*ss off all 30 people attending the private party, instead of tending to his kitchen and perhaps the remaining diners in the other portion of his restaurant.
Maybe at this point, both owners should have been questioning why they had not delivered the food to the 20-30 waiting guests, that had been pre-arranged by the original six diners weeks ago. Nope, apparently it makes more business sense to tell a decent sized gathering of people that they are worthless and that Arturo's doesn't need their business. read more