While the comments below about their contempt for (and avoidance of) legitimate maintenance requests are true, my bigger concern as a property owner would be tenant safety and potential liability concerns.
For example, on multiple occasions we've been trapped in the building due to the front door being stuck shut, forced to leave through garage doors that use electricity to operate, i.e., a death trap in a fire. I have video from at least two of these times, along with the emails I've sent them.
The first time this happened (July of 2016) I had to call Gordon Clifford and threaten to call the fire department to have them come break down the door in order to force them to dispatch a locksmith on the weekend. I got the impression they were content waiting for Monday to avoid the overtime charge, actually telling me to leave the building through my garage. I also have a video from that date of the locksmith telling me exactly what needs to be done to prevent this going forward. As you might suspect, this work still has not been done more than 15 months later.
Which brings me to the next time this happened, August of 2017. Same symptoms, front door completely inoperable. This time around I made the same threat about the fire department--to be 100% clear, I /will/ be calling them next time--and also quoted the specific building code they are violating, provided to me by a contractor friend. I also gave the owner a friendly heads up that Gordon Clifford was putting them at risk by not acting. In addition to the front door locking us in the building, sometimes it does the opposite and refuses to properly shut and lock when entering or exiting the building. Every so often when I come home, I'm able to simply enter the building without using my key. As everyone knows in SF we have a homeless problem, and I worry that someone strung out on drugs will be sitting in the building lobby one day when I get home.
On a different occasion, I had a problem with the garbage disposal not functioning properly. When I called Gordon Clifford I was told to fish around in there with my fingers to see if I could find anything. Does anyone really think that's a safe thing to tell a tenant reporting a problem? (Note that after the issue was finally resolved, about a month after reporting it, they told me a plumber of theirs had been issued by an exploding sink! Is it really worth the risk of trying to force tenants to do this job?)
When they finally dispatched a plumber for the disposal, they then tried to bill me for his time because they found a bottle cap in the disposal--no idea if that was even related to the issue--even though I specifically indicated I just wanted him to pop in next time he was on site for another, unrelated issue. Again, this was after I waited about a month before following up on the issue.
I could go on and on about their avoidance of maintenance, but others have already written enough. Suffice is to say that the common areas of the building have deteriorated since they took over from the previous management. Actually, the only time I've seen them look half-decent is just recently as someone moved out and they were trying to rent the empty apartment. If history is any indication, I don't see the common areas staying this way.
Anyway, if I had to guess they probably get paid some fixed fee per month and are trying to save costs/profit margin by not doing anything. (To be unambiguously clear: I have no idea what their commercial arrangement is.) While this may be tolerable for some period of time for routine maintenance, I really worry about things related to safety. read more