Very honest and helpful I'll definitely recommend them to other…read more They answered all the questions that I had

John provided some very helpful information to give me more clarity of the process when involved in…read morean auto accident which I think is info I would not have received otherwise. I feel better about my options and appreciated his time and his availability while mobile to still address my concerns. Thank you!

I consulted with Mike Munoz. My greatest fear was that I had to speak with police. Mike Munoz…read moremade it very clear that that was not the situation. In fact, the opposite is true, that I did not have to speak with police. Mike explained my rights. In my emotional state, I needed the clear details that he gave me about how to protect rights and invoke my right to remain silent if questioned by the police. Mike explained and simplified the details. With one phone call, he alleviated the fears I was experiencing. Mike is an honest attorney. He gave me a clear evaluation of the situation. If I need his services, which he told me I did not need at the time (an honest attorney!), I will call Mike Munoz. I trust him to protect my life. Thank you, Mike! You do not know how much your comments mean to me! The best attorney ever with lucid explanations!

I am unaware of the services since I still have yet to receive any…read more Yesterday morning I reached out to get a phone consultation with him & was told I'd get him at 4p. By 4:20 I'd yet to hear anything so I called & was told he was running behind on his previous phone call & was understanding. 4:45 hit & I was not nearly as understanding bc my thoughts are "I'm gonna let someone have my back in court that won't have my back for a phone consultation??" I then called again & was told (by the person that answers the phone) that she texted him to remind him of the 4:30 appointment. 4:30?!?!? I was told 4. She then told me he's still on the phone & I expressed to her that I was very irritated because I waited around my phone for something that was scheduled. Hello! I schedule calls & appointments too, the difference is I show up to mine. I decided that I did not want to hire someone that is unorganized with their call system because who knows where all of my court docs will go - could be scattered in several folders. To end the story I was never called at all yesterday & when I called today he was in court & I was told that it's "busy season". I was then told today (the day after not having my appointment followed through with) that I was being rude with expressing how frustrated I was. I wasn't rude, I wasn't vulgar - I was honest. Munoz defended himself saying was a "nice guy" & per reviews I see that, but I was not treated well by him. No apology for missing my consultation & no apology when I cracked a joke saying "you're the most difficult guy to get in contact with" rather he had a condescending attitude stating "yeah, we're a really busy attorneys office". Seems rather prideful to me with no apology whatsoever. Set people up with expectations because we also have a life outside of yours.

The attorney advertised was not available, the one I spoke to was condescending and arrogant and…read morestarting fees for a small issue were $8,000 and up. Don't waste your time.

Brenna Fisher and David Black are very knowledgeable and professional. They went above and beyond…read morefor me as a client and I was impressed by their communication throughout the process. Their expertise led to a positive outcome with my case and I would recommend their services to anyone who needs representation.

The service here at this office is phenomenal. I trust the team here, very professional and…read moretrustworthy!!!

No recomiendo este bufete. Su enfoque está en cobrar, no en trabajar. Cobran cantidades altas y el…read moredinero se agota rápido sin ver progreso real. Aquí solo van a batallar desde el primer día. Los errores son constantes y los resultados simplemente no existen. This firm showed me a pattern of behavior that no client should ever ignore: Basic mistakes on simple tasks like change‑of‑address forms- repeated, careless, and never corrected. Constant turnover of paralegals, forcing clients to repeat the same information because no one communicates internally. Misleading "Spanish‑speaking" advertising. Only the paralegals speak Spanish. The attorneys do not. More communication from billing than from the attorney. When the billing department contacts you more than your lawyer, the priorities are clear -- and they are not the client. The attorney introduced at the beginning was NOT the attorney assigned after payment. That switch alone is a major red flag. My assigned attorney does not appear anywhere on the firm's own team webpage. That lack of transparency is unacceptable. Online reviews show a pattern of detailed complaints that match my experience, yet the firm responds with generic "contact us for feedback" messages instead of addressing the issues. The money disappears fast, and the work does not reflect the cost. The value, communication, and results do not match what they charge. Something is off about how this place operates. The mismatch between their five‑star ratings and the consistent complaints about money and lack of results is impossible to ignore. I'm writing this so others don't have to go through what I did. The lack of consistency, transparency, and professionalism is alarming, and the firm's priorities are nowhere near where they should be.

This law firm is very busy . I have always gotten a response on my questions fast with e-mail …read more If you expect to sit with attorney face to face ( depending on your situation ) forget it this is not the firm for you . They use Zoom and e-mail . You have to feel comfortable with new technology ( this is for the oldies like me .) They took care of my problematic situation so Thank you Neomi .

A firm to be avoided at all costs: especially Mr Ryan Cummings, who heads the outfit. R & R Law…read moreneglected to inform me when my attorney left the firm and ceased representing me, a gross infraction of legal ethics. At first Mr Cummings agreed to make this good, but then reneged on his promise and dismissed my complaint with rude ill-temper. This is a large and unscrupulous firm interested solely in profit, not the welfare of their unfortunate clients.

Richard Suzuki and Charlene were fantastic! After my mother's vehicle was totaled in an accident…read morethey acted quickly to get her into physical therapy so she could start recovering as soon as possible. Then they got her the maximum possible settlement! They were very communicative throughout the process, checking in to make sure she was okay all throughout, and their fee was excessively reasonable given the standard of service they provided. Richard Suzuki will be my first call for any and all legal services I may require!

My experience with Colin O'Sullivan was extremely disappointing. I was an active Army Reservist…read morewhen I was assaulted in the 4th Avenue jail garage, an area that I understood had extensive surveillance. This happened shortly before my ACL reconstruction. The officers were aware of my knee injury. They removed my immobilizer without my permission and, according to facts and body cam audio , targeted my injured knee while making threatening statements. "You'll have more then a torn ACL when I'm done with you" The injury became so severe that jail medical staff denied me entry and I was transported to the emergency room. Afterward, I felt that my case was handled in a way that ignored the circumstances surrounding my injury. My Army unit reached out to Mr. O'Sullivan and the court to provide input and ask questions, but those concerns were not addressed. " I have an Email from a 1st SGT saying this. When the garage video got illegally deleted and longer available, I was told there was no way to obtain it by Mr Sullivan and that it would become my word against theirs. During my five months dealing with this case, I felt pressured rather than represented. I was told future plea offers could get worse, but I refused to accept something I did not believe was right. Ultimately, I no longer have those felony charges on my record. At sentencing, Mr. O'Sullivan did not appear, and a substitute attorney represented me. That attorney showed more effort fighting for me in that one appearance than I experienced during the entire time I was represented.

I've only needed a lawyer once before, for criminal defense, so when I needed a lawyer in another…read moreemergency situation, I pulled the business card out of my wallet and called again. I was connected to Mr. Hamby, on a holiday, to explain my situation and what I was looking for. Ultimately, it turns out that the kind of lawyer I needed was not within his firm's area of expertise. What impressed me though was that he was able to politely take charge of the conversation, ask me simple and straightforward questions, and get to the conclusion in a short amount of time. It might seem silly to leave a positive review for a consultation that ended with "I'm not the lawyer you need," but that's just the reality of the situation. A less talented person might have had me going in circles, explaining things over and over again, misunderstanding what I was asking for and so on. I really appreciated his professionalism and skill, and in the future, if I do need a criminal defense lawyer, I think I would be very happy with Mr. Hamby's services.

Hired them 2 years ago. They charged me over 20,000 gave no legal advice, no protection no motions…read morewere filled on our defense we were left on our own. Fired them after they kept lying. The prosecutor even tried to charge them with malpractice for being unethical. That was the only time that they claimed anything legal wise. They swap lawyers in the case with out telling us why. We showed up to appointments and our lawyer claimed they they were not expecting us to see the judge with them. In shirt they asked us to go to court with out a lawyer. We fired them hired someone they closed our clase in under 2 months free and clear. 2 years latter dm cantor is asking us to pay them even more money. They made no attempts to contact us during them time. Thye only sent a letter in the mail 2 years after someone cleaned up there mess and asked for more money and treated to sue us if we did not pay them. So if you want to trow your money away and be left in court by your self as dm cantor bills you and dose not give any legal advice go ahead and hire them. Go with someone else anyone else is a far better option. Over priced no legal services provided then years latter get a threat letter in the mail. What a great after service they have.

I paid them my savings. I feel like an idiot. You will too…read moreif you hire them. Check the BBB and REAL reviews. Public defender would have done better and spent more time on the case. Mayes Telles and Chris Culbert leave a bad taste in my mouth.

I retained Meyes Telles in early 2025 after being contacted about a potential unemployment-related…read moreinvestigation. I paid $6,782 up front based on the understanding that this would cover the investigative phase and early representation. During my consultation, the conversations repeatedly emphasized that my "future," "freedom," and "life" were at risk if I didn't retain the firm immediately. At the time I was scared and vulnerable, and looking back, the tone now feels unnecessarily alarm-driven given how my case ultimately resolved. Over the following months, very little seemed to happen on my case, but I was still charged recurring $500 "criminal investigation minimum" fees plus additional charges for brief emails and short calls on top of that. My understanding of a "minimum fee" was that it would apply only when less than that amount of work occurred, not as an extra charge added regardless of activity. The wording in the agreement felt unclear, and the way the fee was applied didn't feel consistent. When I requested a full accounting, the billing appeared fragmented across many tiny time entries in months where the minimum fee was also added. I asked for clarification and said clearly that I wanted to resolve my questions internally and amicably first. After one reply from the firm, my follow-up request went unanswered. When the matter finally became a formal case, I was then told I would need to pay an additional $15,000 for "pre-trial work," even though only one hearing was expected. This was never clearly disclosed at the beginning, and it felt like a sudden financial surprise at the worst possible moment. I had also previously been told that unused funds would roll forward if the case escalated -- but when I asked about that, the explanation changed completely. At that point I no longer felt comfortable remaining with the firm. I hired a new attorney for $3,500. Within one round of plea negotiations, we obtained a highly favorable resolution that removed all felony charges and resulted in a much better outcome than what I had been led to believe was realistic. My new counsel also expressed concern about how the early strategy and billing from my prior representation had been handled, and explained that my situation was actually fairly straightforward -- not the extreme, catastrophic scenario I was initially presented with. Based on my experience, I strongly recommend that anyone considering this firm ask very direct questions about: * what their "monthly minimum" fee actually means in practice * when and how large additional fees may be * whether funds truly roll forward if the case progresses * what realistic case outcomes look like before being told worst-case scenarios I left this experience feeling financially taken advantage of, misled about the severity of my situation, and ignored when I asked reasonable questions about billing. I would not use this firm again.